技术难题:快速发展的技术如何导致商品化

T. Chan, R. Dhar, William P. Putsis
{"title":"技术难题:快速发展的技术如何导致商品化","authors":"T. Chan, R. Dhar, William P. Putsis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2580902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much of the recent empirical IO research has been conducted in the context of relatively mature, stable (often consumer packaged goods) markets. In these markets, consumer preferences and competitive interaction are often characterized by relatively stable patterns over time. In contrast, modeling and estimating analogous patterns in rapidly changing technology-intensive industries, where brand preferences and technology evolve rapidly, can be challenging. Our primary objective in this research is to build on recent developments in econometric estimation and modeling to assess the time-varying shifts in consumer brand preferences in a rapidly changing technology industry. In doing so, we document an interesting technological conundrum—technological advancement can often lead to commoditization. In the Personal Computer (PC) market, this began with differentiation that was initially central to success in a market that has been increasingly commoditized over time. Methodologically, we adopt a factor-analytic approach to model and estimate the evolution of consumer brand preferences over time.","PeriodicalId":132920,"journal":{"name":"Customer Needs and Solutions","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Technological Conundrum: How Rapidly Advancing Technology Can Lead to Commoditization\",\"authors\":\"T. Chan, R. Dhar, William P. Putsis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2580902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Much of the recent empirical IO research has been conducted in the context of relatively mature, stable (often consumer packaged goods) markets. In these markets, consumer preferences and competitive interaction are often characterized by relatively stable patterns over time. In contrast, modeling and estimating analogous patterns in rapidly changing technology-intensive industries, where brand preferences and technology evolve rapidly, can be challenging. Our primary objective in this research is to build on recent developments in econometric estimation and modeling to assess the time-varying shifts in consumer brand preferences in a rapidly changing technology industry. In doing so, we document an interesting technological conundrum—technological advancement can often lead to commoditization. In the Personal Computer (PC) market, this began with differentiation that was initially central to success in a market that has been increasingly commoditized over time. Methodologically, we adopt a factor-analytic approach to model and estimate the evolution of consumer brand preferences over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Customer Needs and Solutions\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Customer Needs and Solutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Customer Needs and Solutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2580902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

最近的许多实证IO研究都是在相对成熟、稳定(通常是包装消费品)市场的背景下进行的。在这些市场中,随着时间的推移,消费者偏好和竞争互动往往具有相对稳定的模式。相比之下,在快速变化的技术密集型行业中,品牌偏好和技术发展迅速,对类似模式进行建模和估计可能具有挑战性。我们在这项研究中的主要目标是建立在计量经济学估计和建模的最新发展,以评估快速变化的技术行业中消费者品牌偏好的时变变化。在这样做的过程中,我们记录了一个有趣的技术难题——技术进步往往会导致商品化。在个人电脑(PC)市场上,这始于差异化,这是随着时间的推移日益商品化的市场上最初成功的核心。在方法上,我们采用因素分析方法来建模和估计消费者品牌偏好随时间的演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Technological Conundrum: How Rapidly Advancing Technology Can Lead to Commoditization
Much of the recent empirical IO research has been conducted in the context of relatively mature, stable (often consumer packaged goods) markets. In these markets, consumer preferences and competitive interaction are often characterized by relatively stable patterns over time. In contrast, modeling and estimating analogous patterns in rapidly changing technology-intensive industries, where brand preferences and technology evolve rapidly, can be challenging. Our primary objective in this research is to build on recent developments in econometric estimation and modeling to assess the time-varying shifts in consumer brand preferences in a rapidly changing technology industry. In doing so, we document an interesting technological conundrum—technological advancement can often lead to commoditization. In the Personal Computer (PC) market, this began with differentiation that was initially central to success in a market that has been increasingly commoditized over time. Methodologically, we adopt a factor-analytic approach to model and estimate the evolution of consumer brand preferences over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research Note “Replicating Published Literature Review using ChatGPT-Plus: Observations” Marketing at Tuck: 120-Plus Years of Relevance, Rigor, and Impact Marketing at UNSW Sydney: Building Marketing Capability in Australasia Simon Marketing Review of Marketing Relevant Real Activity Manipulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1