通过团队模拟,支气管镜检查是否更安全?

J. Tonkin, Y. Ong
{"title":"通过团队模拟,支气管镜检查是否更安全?","authors":"J. Tonkin, Y. Ong","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is performed in a variety of patients. Potential complications include respiratory failure and bleeding. We looked at whether team-based simulation could improve the management of these complications. Methods: Five sessions were run every 6 months in the endoscopy unit using a mannequin with a bronchial tree. The scenario started from the WHO checklist to completion of the case. Consultants underwent the scenario initially, then ran the simulation at each change of junior doctors with endoscopy staff. During the simulation, the patient developed respiratory failure. It examined skills such as identification of the deteriorating patient, decision to stop the procedure, resuscitation including use of oxygen and bag valve mask and reversal agents. After each simulation, debriefing was performed and written feedback gained. Results: 8 consultants, 9 trainees and 8 nurses took part. 82% said they have changed practice as a result. Several noted the importance of a specific patient focussed initial team brief, including discussion of when the procedure should be aborted. Some nurses had noticed the deteriorating patient but commented on the observations without actually saying “stop”. Discussion: Simulation allows staff to practise how to manage emergencies in a safe environment. The sessions highlighted the importance of a patient specific team brief and it reinforced that all staff should be able to suggest stopping the procedure. A simulation scenario is now run in the first bronchoscopy session when trainees start at our hospital. Bronchoscopy simulation is useful not only in teaching learners how to do the procedure, but can also teach teams how to cope when emergencies occur.","PeriodicalId":228043,"journal":{"name":"Medical education, web and internet","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can bronchoscopy be made safer through team-based Simulation?\",\"authors\":\"J. Tonkin, Y. Ong\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is performed in a variety of patients. Potential complications include respiratory failure and bleeding. We looked at whether team-based simulation could improve the management of these complications. Methods: Five sessions were run every 6 months in the endoscopy unit using a mannequin with a bronchial tree. The scenario started from the WHO checklist to completion of the case. Consultants underwent the scenario initially, then ran the simulation at each change of junior doctors with endoscopy staff. During the simulation, the patient developed respiratory failure. It examined skills such as identification of the deteriorating patient, decision to stop the procedure, resuscitation including use of oxygen and bag valve mask and reversal agents. After each simulation, debriefing was performed and written feedback gained. Results: 8 consultants, 9 trainees and 8 nurses took part. 82% said they have changed practice as a result. Several noted the importance of a specific patient focussed initial team brief, including discussion of when the procedure should be aborted. Some nurses had noticed the deteriorating patient but commented on the observations without actually saying “stop”. Discussion: Simulation allows staff to practise how to manage emergencies in a safe environment. The sessions highlighted the importance of a patient specific team brief and it reinforced that all staff should be able to suggest stopping the procedure. A simulation scenario is now run in the first bronchoscopy session when trainees start at our hospital. Bronchoscopy simulation is useful not only in teaching learners how to do the procedure, but can also teach teams how to cope when emergencies occur.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical education, web and internet\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical education, web and internet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical education, web and internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纤维支气管镜检查适用于多种患者。潜在的并发症包括呼吸衰竭和出血。我们研究了基于团队的模拟是否可以改善这些并发症的管理。方法:每6个月使用支气管树模型在内窥镜检查单元进行5次检查。该情景从世卫组织核对表开始,直到病例完成。顾问们首先经历了这个场景,然后在每次更换初级医生和内窥镜检查人员时进行模拟。在模拟过程中,患者出现呼吸衰竭。它检查了诸如识别病情恶化的病人、决定停止手术、复苏(包括氧气和气囊阀面罩的使用)和逆转剂等技能。每次模拟后,进行汇报并获得书面反馈。结果:参加咨询医师8名、学员9名、护士8名。82%的人表示,他们因此改变了做法。一些人指出了以患者为中心的初始小组简报的重要性,包括讨论何时应该终止手术。一些护士注意到了病情恶化的病人,但在评论这些观察结果时却没有说“停止”。讨论:模拟让员工练习如何在安全的环境中处理紧急情况。会议强调了针对特定患者的小组简报的重要性,并强调所有工作人员都应该能够建议停止该程序。现在,当学员开始在我们医院进行支气管镜检查时,在第一次会议上运行模拟场景。模拟支气管镜检查不仅可以教会学习者如何进行手术,还可以教会团队如何应对紧急情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can bronchoscopy be made safer through team-based Simulation?
Introduction: Fibreoptic bronchoscopy is performed in a variety of patients. Potential complications include respiratory failure and bleeding. We looked at whether team-based simulation could improve the management of these complications. Methods: Five sessions were run every 6 months in the endoscopy unit using a mannequin with a bronchial tree. The scenario started from the WHO checklist to completion of the case. Consultants underwent the scenario initially, then ran the simulation at each change of junior doctors with endoscopy staff. During the simulation, the patient developed respiratory failure. It examined skills such as identification of the deteriorating patient, decision to stop the procedure, resuscitation including use of oxygen and bag valve mask and reversal agents. After each simulation, debriefing was performed and written feedback gained. Results: 8 consultants, 9 trainees and 8 nurses took part. 82% said they have changed practice as a result. Several noted the importance of a specific patient focussed initial team brief, including discussion of when the procedure should be aborted. Some nurses had noticed the deteriorating patient but commented on the observations without actually saying “stop”. Discussion: Simulation allows staff to practise how to manage emergencies in a safe environment. The sessions highlighted the importance of a patient specific team brief and it reinforced that all staff should be able to suggest stopping the procedure. A simulation scenario is now run in the first bronchoscopy session when trainees start at our hospital. Bronchoscopy simulation is useful not only in teaching learners how to do the procedure, but can also teach teams how to cope when emergencies occur.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The value of a pleural fellowship post Comparison of physicians’ and medical students’ knowledge in the treatment and prevention of COPD according to the final results of the ASCO-II study COPD.Pal: Using a person-based approach to develop a self-management app for people with COPD Children’s interstital lung diseases (chILD) – an area of unmet educational need? Impact of COVID-19 on Tunisian pulmonology trainees
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1