{"title":"土耳其的蕨类植物——订正清单及其与欧洲和西喜马拉雅的关系","authors":"C. R. Jenkins, B. Parris","doi":"10.54207/bsmps1000-2021-6yaj92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We outline the phytogeographical relations of Turkish pteridophytes following revision of our previous check-list. Although mainly European, the Turkish fern-flora has c. 40% of its species and subspecies in common with or related to the West Himalayan European phytogeographical element. In the pteridophyte accounts of the recent Illustrated Flora of Turkey, it is clear that many specimens have been misidentified and various species incorrectly illustrated. In addition the extensive Turkish pteridophyte collections in international herbaria made by non-Turkish collectors, including those of the present first author, were not drawn upon and international consultation was intentionally not entered into. Although it is unfortunately not possible in the present circumstances to study and re-identify the great bulk of authentic specimens in Turkish herbaria cited in the Flora, we have reassessed some important records and corrected the many obvious anomalies in the Flora and we have added to the distributional data from our own critically studied collections. We therefore present an updated and taxonomically revised checklist with notes and additional distributions, including a few taxa overlooked in the Flora. We also treat the important subspecies which were omitted there. A new hybrid Asplenium and another of Cystopteris are described and a few necessary new combinations are made.","PeriodicalId":142181,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Forestry","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pteridophytes of Turkey - A Revised Check-List and their Relationships to Europe and the West Himalaya\",\"authors\":\"C. R. Jenkins, B. Parris\",\"doi\":\"10.54207/bsmps1000-2021-6yaj92\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We outline the phytogeographical relations of Turkish pteridophytes following revision of our previous check-list. Although mainly European, the Turkish fern-flora has c. 40% of its species and subspecies in common with or related to the West Himalayan European phytogeographical element. In the pteridophyte accounts of the recent Illustrated Flora of Turkey, it is clear that many specimens have been misidentified and various species incorrectly illustrated. In addition the extensive Turkish pteridophyte collections in international herbaria made by non-Turkish collectors, including those of the present first author, were not drawn upon and international consultation was intentionally not entered into. Although it is unfortunately not possible in the present circumstances to study and re-identify the great bulk of authentic specimens in Turkish herbaria cited in the Flora, we have reassessed some important records and corrected the many obvious anomalies in the Flora and we have added to the distributional data from our own critically studied collections. We therefore present an updated and taxonomically revised checklist with notes and additional distributions, including a few taxa overlooked in the Flora. We also treat the important subspecies which were omitted there. A new hybrid Asplenium and another of Cystopteris are described and a few necessary new combinations are made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Forestry\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2021-6yaj92\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2021-6yaj92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们概述了土耳其蕨类植物的植物地理关系后修订我们以前的检查表。虽然土耳其蕨类植物群主要分布在欧洲,但其物种和亚种中有40%与西喜马拉雅欧洲植物地理元素相同或相关。在最近的《土耳其植物图鉴》(Illustrated Flora of Turkey)的蕨类记述中,很明显,许多标本被错误地识别,许多物种被错误地图鉴。此外,国际植物标本馆中由非土耳其收集者收集的大量土耳其蕨类植物,包括本第一作者收集的,没有加以利用,也有意不进行国际协商。虽然不幸的是,在目前的情况下,不可能研究和重新鉴定《植物区系》中引用的土耳其植物标本馆的大量真实标本,但我们重新评估了一些重要的记录,纠正了《植物区系》中许多明显的异常,并从我们自己严格研究的藏品中添加了分布数据。因此,我们提出了一份更新和分类修订的清单,其中包括注释和其他分布,包括一些在植物区系中被忽视的分类群。我们还讨论了在那里被省略的重要亚种。本文描述了一种新的天门冬属和另一种天门冬属的杂交品种,并进行了一些必要的新组合。
Pteridophytes of Turkey - A Revised Check-List and their Relationships to Europe and the West Himalaya
We outline the phytogeographical relations of Turkish pteridophytes following revision of our previous check-list. Although mainly European, the Turkish fern-flora has c. 40% of its species and subspecies in common with or related to the West Himalayan European phytogeographical element. In the pteridophyte accounts of the recent Illustrated Flora of Turkey, it is clear that many specimens have been misidentified and various species incorrectly illustrated. In addition the extensive Turkish pteridophyte collections in international herbaria made by non-Turkish collectors, including those of the present first author, were not drawn upon and international consultation was intentionally not entered into. Although it is unfortunately not possible in the present circumstances to study and re-identify the great bulk of authentic specimens in Turkish herbaria cited in the Flora, we have reassessed some important records and corrected the many obvious anomalies in the Flora and we have added to the distributional data from our own critically studied collections. We therefore present an updated and taxonomically revised checklist with notes and additional distributions, including a few taxa overlooked in the Flora. We also treat the important subspecies which were omitted there. A new hybrid Asplenium and another of Cystopteris are described and a few necessary new combinations are made.