模拟自我疏散原型以改善野火疏散交通模拟:区域案例研究

D. Singh, C. Bulumulla, K. Strahan, J. Gilbert, P. Gamage, L. Márquez, V. Lemiale
{"title":"模拟自我疏散原型以改善野火疏散交通模拟:区域案例研究","authors":"D. Singh, C. Bulumulla, K. Strahan, J. Gilbert, P. Gamage, L. Márquez, V. Lemiale","doi":"10.36334/modsim.2023.singh54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Wildfires are a serious threat in many regions of the world, including Australia. The risk of these fires is expected to continue to increase due to climate change, putting more people and communities in harm’s way. One approach to reducing the risk to lives in such fires is to plan and prepare for community evacuations. Researchers have been exploring the use of self-evacuation archetypes, clustering self-reported individual behaviours in past fires, to gain insights into who evacuates, why they do so, and when. Self-evacuation archetypes encompass a range of factors, including demographic characteristics, risk perception, social networks, and prior experience. By understanding these factors, researchers can create more realistic models of decision-making during a wildfire event. In Australia, evacuations are not mandatory, and while the understanding of the decision to leave or shelter in place has advanced, much less is understood about how these decisions play out as traffic on the transport network. For instance, intermediate trips, which are trips to destinations other than the evacuation place, can constitute a significant proportion of trips following an evacuation recommendation, and can lead to different outcomes compared to those of a coordinated evacuation. Therefore, modelling the diversity of decisions and their contribution to traffic is vital to understanding local evacuation concerns and planning safe community evacuations. In this work, we present an agent-based decision-making model and scenario for the town of Castlemaine, located in the state of Victoria, Australia. Our model is based on self-evacuation archetypes, applied to a synthetic population representing the demographics of residents of the region. The model provides a framework for understanding how different individuals are likely to respond during a wildfire event, and allows exploration of the potential impact of different interventions. We believe that our approach provides a more realistic and nuanced picture of traffic during a wildfire event and can help emergency services plan more effective response strategies.","PeriodicalId":390064,"journal":{"name":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modelling self-evacuation archetypes to improve wildfire evacuation traffic simulations: A regional case study\",\"authors\":\"D. Singh, C. Bulumulla, K. Strahan, J. Gilbert, P. Gamage, L. Márquez, V. Lemiale\",\"doi\":\"10.36334/modsim.2023.singh54\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Wildfires are a serious threat in many regions of the world, including Australia. The risk of these fires is expected to continue to increase due to climate change, putting more people and communities in harm’s way. One approach to reducing the risk to lives in such fires is to plan and prepare for community evacuations. Researchers have been exploring the use of self-evacuation archetypes, clustering self-reported individual behaviours in past fires, to gain insights into who evacuates, why they do so, and when. Self-evacuation archetypes encompass a range of factors, including demographic characteristics, risk perception, social networks, and prior experience. By understanding these factors, researchers can create more realistic models of decision-making during a wildfire event. In Australia, evacuations are not mandatory, and while the understanding of the decision to leave or shelter in place has advanced, much less is understood about how these decisions play out as traffic on the transport network. For instance, intermediate trips, which are trips to destinations other than the evacuation place, can constitute a significant proportion of trips following an evacuation recommendation, and can lead to different outcomes compared to those of a coordinated evacuation. Therefore, modelling the diversity of decisions and their contribution to traffic is vital to understanding local evacuation concerns and planning safe community evacuations. In this work, we present an agent-based decision-making model and scenario for the town of Castlemaine, located in the state of Victoria, Australia. Our model is based on self-evacuation archetypes, applied to a synthetic population representing the demographics of residents of the region. The model provides a framework for understanding how different individuals are likely to respond during a wildfire event, and allows exploration of the potential impact of different interventions. We believe that our approach provides a more realistic and nuanced picture of traffic during a wildfire event and can help emergency services plan more effective response strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":390064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.singh54\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MODSIM2023, 25th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2023.singh54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

野火在世界上许多地区都是一个严重的威胁,包括澳大利亚。由于气候变化,预计这些火灾的风险将继续增加,使更多的人和社区受到伤害。减少此类火灾中生命危险的一种方法是为社区疏散做好计划和准备。研究人员一直在探索自我疏散原型的使用,将过去火灾中自我报告的个人行为聚类,以深入了解是谁在疏散,他们为什么这样做,以及何时这样做。自我疏散原型包含一系列因素,包括人口特征、风险感知、社会网络和先前经验。通过了解这些因素,研究人员可以在野火事件中创建更现实的决策模型。在澳大利亚,疏散并不是强制性的,虽然人们对离开或留在原地避难的决定的理解有所提高,但对这些决定如何影响交通网络的理解却少得多。例如,中间旅行,即前往疏散地点以外的目的地的旅行,可能在疏散建议后的旅行中占很大比例,并且与协调疏散相比可能导致不同的结果。因此,模拟决策的多样性及其对交通的影响对于理解当地疏散问题和规划安全的社区疏散至关重要。在这项工作中,我们为位于澳大利亚维多利亚州的Castlemaine镇提出了一个基于主体的决策模型和场景。我们的模型基于自我疏散原型,应用于代表该地区居民人口统计数据的合成人口。该模型为理解不同个体在野火事件中可能做出的反应提供了一个框架,并允许探索不同干预措施的潜在影响。我们相信,我们的方法提供了一个更现实、更细致的野火事件期间的交通情况,可以帮助应急服务部门制定更有效的响应策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modelling self-evacuation archetypes to improve wildfire evacuation traffic simulations: A regional case study
: Wildfires are a serious threat in many regions of the world, including Australia. The risk of these fires is expected to continue to increase due to climate change, putting more people and communities in harm’s way. One approach to reducing the risk to lives in such fires is to plan and prepare for community evacuations. Researchers have been exploring the use of self-evacuation archetypes, clustering self-reported individual behaviours in past fires, to gain insights into who evacuates, why they do so, and when. Self-evacuation archetypes encompass a range of factors, including demographic characteristics, risk perception, social networks, and prior experience. By understanding these factors, researchers can create more realistic models of decision-making during a wildfire event. In Australia, evacuations are not mandatory, and while the understanding of the decision to leave or shelter in place has advanced, much less is understood about how these decisions play out as traffic on the transport network. For instance, intermediate trips, which are trips to destinations other than the evacuation place, can constitute a significant proportion of trips following an evacuation recommendation, and can lead to different outcomes compared to those of a coordinated evacuation. Therefore, modelling the diversity of decisions and their contribution to traffic is vital to understanding local evacuation concerns and planning safe community evacuations. In this work, we present an agent-based decision-making model and scenario for the town of Castlemaine, located in the state of Victoria, Australia. Our model is based on self-evacuation archetypes, applied to a synthetic population representing the demographics of residents of the region. The model provides a framework for understanding how different individuals are likely to respond during a wildfire event, and allows exploration of the potential impact of different interventions. We believe that our approach provides a more realistic and nuanced picture of traffic during a wildfire event and can help emergency services plan more effective response strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modelling of the activated sludge process with a stratified settling unit Recent changes in the water and ecological condition at the arid Tarim River Basin A study on internal observation of vertical protective nets of temporary structures using image processing techniques Developing synthetic datasets for reef modelling Modelling hydrological impact of remotely sensed vegetation change
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1