《欧洲社会政治化导论》

B. Vanhercke, D. Ghailani, P. Pochet
{"title":"《欧洲社会政治化导论》","authors":"B. Vanhercke, D. Ghailani, P. Pochet","doi":"10.4337/9781800885264.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the onslaught of the global financial and economic crisis, the European Union (EU) transformed – overnight and contre coeur – from a ‘benign’ project of single market expansion and currency integration into a highly contested political union. The Greek sovereign debt crisis of 2010 that almost brought down the euro fed back into political distrust among the leaders of the Member States, with the European Commission caught in the middle of the crossfire. With the financial crisis turning soon into a deep social crisis, the increasing intrusiveness of the EU into domestic decision-making, especially in those countries under economic adjustment programmes, pushed for a mobilisation of political parties in defence of national welfare states. The track-record of EU crisis management – overly attentive to debt sustainability and competitiveness-led growth strategy – festered a looming sense of social betrayal by the EU and heightened politicisation of EU affairs at the domestic level. Many articles have been published that trace the evolution of ‘Social Europe’ after the Great Recession and the Eastern enlargement. The bulk of this literature has described the development of the social dimensions of the EU in negative terms by referring to the absorption, the displacement, the decline and the marginalisation of EU social policies. They shed light on different domains, including the legislative agenda (Garben, 2018; Kilpatrick, 2018), the coordination of national policies in the framework of the European Semester (Copeland and Daly, 2018; Dawson, 2018) and the financial support provided to Member States via the Multiannual Financial Framework (Avdikos and Chardas, 2016). Particular attention has been paid to the interaction between the economic and social dimension of the EU, and especially on the negative externalities of the former on the latter (Crespy and Menz, 2015; Degryse and Pochet, 2018). Several books, mostly edited volumes, have been published examining the EU response to the sovereign debt crisis and how this has affected welfare state reforms in the Member States. Among others, The Sovereign Debt Crisis, the EU and Welfare State Reform, edited by Caroline de la Porte and Elke Heins (2016); Social Policy and the Euro Crisis, edited by Amandine Crespy and Georg Menz (2015); A European Social Union after the Crisis, edited by Frank Vandenbroucke, Catherine Barnard and Geert De","PeriodicalId":127553,"journal":{"name":"The Politicisation of Social Europe","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction to The Politicisation of Social Europe\",\"authors\":\"B. Vanhercke, D. Ghailani, P. Pochet\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781800885264.00009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the onslaught of the global financial and economic crisis, the European Union (EU) transformed – overnight and contre coeur – from a ‘benign’ project of single market expansion and currency integration into a highly contested political union. The Greek sovereign debt crisis of 2010 that almost brought down the euro fed back into political distrust among the leaders of the Member States, with the European Commission caught in the middle of the crossfire. With the financial crisis turning soon into a deep social crisis, the increasing intrusiveness of the EU into domestic decision-making, especially in those countries under economic adjustment programmes, pushed for a mobilisation of political parties in defence of national welfare states. The track-record of EU crisis management – overly attentive to debt sustainability and competitiveness-led growth strategy – festered a looming sense of social betrayal by the EU and heightened politicisation of EU affairs at the domestic level. Many articles have been published that trace the evolution of ‘Social Europe’ after the Great Recession and the Eastern enlargement. The bulk of this literature has described the development of the social dimensions of the EU in negative terms by referring to the absorption, the displacement, the decline and the marginalisation of EU social policies. They shed light on different domains, including the legislative agenda (Garben, 2018; Kilpatrick, 2018), the coordination of national policies in the framework of the European Semester (Copeland and Daly, 2018; Dawson, 2018) and the financial support provided to Member States via the Multiannual Financial Framework (Avdikos and Chardas, 2016). Particular attention has been paid to the interaction between the economic and social dimension of the EU, and especially on the negative externalities of the former on the latter (Crespy and Menz, 2015; Degryse and Pochet, 2018). Several books, mostly edited volumes, have been published examining the EU response to the sovereign debt crisis and how this has affected welfare state reforms in the Member States. Among others, The Sovereign Debt Crisis, the EU and Welfare State Reform, edited by Caroline de la Porte and Elke Heins (2016); Social Policy and the Euro Crisis, edited by Amandine Crespy and Georg Menz (2015); A European Social Union after the Crisis, edited by Frank Vandenbroucke, Catherine Barnard and Geert De\",\"PeriodicalId\":127553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Politicisation of Social Europe\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Politicisation of Social Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885264.00009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Politicisation of Social Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800885264.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球金融和经济危机的冲击,欧盟(EU)一夜之间从单一市场扩张和货币一体化的“良性”项目转变为一个竞争激烈的政治联盟。2010年的希腊主权债务危机几乎拖垮了欧元,这又加剧了成员国领导人之间的政治不信任,欧盟委员会(European Commission)被夹在了战火之中。随着金融危机很快演变为一场深刻的社会危机,欧盟越来越多地干预国内决策,尤其是在那些实施经济调整计划的国家,这推动了政党动员起来捍卫国家福利国家。欧盟危机管理的过往记录——过度关注债务可持续性和以竞争力为主导的增长战略——让人们隐隐感到欧盟背叛了社会,并在国内层面加剧了欧盟事务的政治化。许多文章追溯了大衰退和东扩后“社会欧洲”的演变。这种文献的大部分描述了欧盟的社会层面的发展在消极方面,指的是吸收,位移,衰退和边缘化的欧盟社会政策。它们揭示了不同的领域,包括立法议程(Garben, 2018;Kilpatrick, 2018),欧洲学期框架下的国家政策协调(Copeland and Daly, 2018;道森,2018)以及通过多年度财政框架向会员国提供的财政支持(Avdikos和Chardas, 2016)。特别关注欧盟经济和社会层面之间的相互作用,特别是前者对后者的负外部性(Crespy和Menz, 2015;Degryse and Pochet, 2018)。已经出版了几本书,主要是编辑的卷,研究欧盟对主权债务危机的反应以及这如何影响成员国的福利国家改革。其中,由卡罗琳·德拉波特和埃尔克·海因斯编辑的《主权债务危机、欧盟和福利国家改革》(2016);《社会政策与欧元危机》,阿曼达·克雷斯皮和乔治·门兹主编(2015年);《危机后的欧洲社会联盟》,弗兰克·范登布鲁克、凯瑟琳·巴纳德和吉尔特·德主编
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction to The Politicisation of Social Europe
With the onslaught of the global financial and economic crisis, the European Union (EU) transformed – overnight and contre coeur – from a ‘benign’ project of single market expansion and currency integration into a highly contested political union. The Greek sovereign debt crisis of 2010 that almost brought down the euro fed back into political distrust among the leaders of the Member States, with the European Commission caught in the middle of the crossfire. With the financial crisis turning soon into a deep social crisis, the increasing intrusiveness of the EU into domestic decision-making, especially in those countries under economic adjustment programmes, pushed for a mobilisation of political parties in defence of national welfare states. The track-record of EU crisis management – overly attentive to debt sustainability and competitiveness-led growth strategy – festered a looming sense of social betrayal by the EU and heightened politicisation of EU affairs at the domestic level. Many articles have been published that trace the evolution of ‘Social Europe’ after the Great Recession and the Eastern enlargement. The bulk of this literature has described the development of the social dimensions of the EU in negative terms by referring to the absorption, the displacement, the decline and the marginalisation of EU social policies. They shed light on different domains, including the legislative agenda (Garben, 2018; Kilpatrick, 2018), the coordination of national policies in the framework of the European Semester (Copeland and Daly, 2018; Dawson, 2018) and the financial support provided to Member States via the Multiannual Financial Framework (Avdikos and Chardas, 2016). Particular attention has been paid to the interaction between the economic and social dimension of the EU, and especially on the negative externalities of the former on the latter (Crespy and Menz, 2015; Degryse and Pochet, 2018). Several books, mostly edited volumes, have been published examining the EU response to the sovereign debt crisis and how this has affected welfare state reforms in the Member States. Among others, The Sovereign Debt Crisis, the EU and Welfare State Reform, edited by Caroline de la Porte and Elke Heins (2016); Social Policy and the Euro Crisis, edited by Amandine Crespy and Georg Menz (2015); A European Social Union after the Crisis, edited by Frank Vandenbroucke, Catherine Barnard and Geert De
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The European Unemployment Benefit Scheme: between political conflicts and windows of opportunity When politics steps in: the socialisation of the Semester and the role of the European Commission EU integration and the welfare state Introduction to The Politicisation of Social Europe From the Monti II Regulation to the revision of the Posting of Workers Directive
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1