寻找失落的传统:走向19世纪30年代至40年代上半叶的教堂绘画史

Konstantin Maslov
{"title":"寻找失落的传统:走向19世纪30年代至40年代上半叶的教堂绘画史","authors":"Konstantin Maslov","doi":"10.15382/sturv202248.74-94","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fast moving Europeanisation of Russia, started by Peter the Great and continued by his successors, showed itself, among other things, in founding the Imperial Academy of Fine Arts and in the birth of Russian academic school, whose brilliant achievements were not in the least the legacy of Russian art tradition, especially that of icon-painting, for the latter was only allowed to exist as the arts of the commoners. This state of things was regarded as something to overcome during the reign of Nicholas I, when gradual re-establishment of the ties with tradition begins, seen in particular in the \"Byzantine style\" in Church architecture, invented by K.A. Ton in late 1820s - early 1830s at the behest of the emperor. Conservative ideology, expressed as it was in the so called theory of the official nationhood (narodnost'), starting from the times when S.S. Uvarov, the author of this theory, was appointed Minister of Public Instruction, was not reflected, however, in the academic Church painting and in the paintings which belonged to historic genre as a whole. This article is focused on the views on the academic Church paintings and traditional icon-paintings that were typical of the educated class of the 1830s and early 1840s. It is shown that the contemporaries of Russian \"historical\" painters, including those in the Church, saw their calling in commitment to the people (narodnost'), for \"there is a need to assume... one's own character, which, while retaining its originality, would tend toward the general harmony with the European Art\"; at least a part of the society has come to the opinion that at the time of the decline of famous schools of the West, it is in Russia that paintings show \"life and development\". (I.V. Kookolnik). In Church paintings of the 1830s the \"Russian\" style, oriented at the monuments of the past, originated not in the academic school itself, but in the adminicular activity, that is, as a by-product of the artistic and archaeological studies of F.G. Solntsev. A.N. Olenin, the President of the Academy of Arts, on whose intiative these studies were performed, envisaged their outcome as \"the complete painting course of archaeology and ethnography for the artists\". This course was born in the 1830s during two works of the artist: the making of Church calendar and the painting of Terem Palace and the churches in the Moscow Kremlin.","PeriodicalId":212447,"journal":{"name":"St. Tikhons' University Review. Series V. Christian Art","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In search of the lost tradition: towards a history of church painting of the 1830s — 1st half of the 1840s\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Maslov\",\"doi\":\"10.15382/sturv202248.74-94\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fast moving Europeanisation of Russia, started by Peter the Great and continued by his successors, showed itself, among other things, in founding the Imperial Academy of Fine Arts and in the birth of Russian academic school, whose brilliant achievements were not in the least the legacy of Russian art tradition, especially that of icon-painting, for the latter was only allowed to exist as the arts of the commoners. This state of things was regarded as something to overcome during the reign of Nicholas I, when gradual re-establishment of the ties with tradition begins, seen in particular in the \\\"Byzantine style\\\" in Church architecture, invented by K.A. Ton in late 1820s - early 1830s at the behest of the emperor. Conservative ideology, expressed as it was in the so called theory of the official nationhood (narodnost'), starting from the times when S.S. Uvarov, the author of this theory, was appointed Minister of Public Instruction, was not reflected, however, in the academic Church painting and in the paintings which belonged to historic genre as a whole. This article is focused on the views on the academic Church paintings and traditional icon-paintings that were typical of the educated class of the 1830s and early 1840s. It is shown that the contemporaries of Russian \\\"historical\\\" painters, including those in the Church, saw their calling in commitment to the people (narodnost'), for \\\"there is a need to assume... one's own character, which, while retaining its originality, would tend toward the general harmony with the European Art\\\"; at least a part of the society has come to the opinion that at the time of the decline of famous schools of the West, it is in Russia that paintings show \\\"life and development\\\". (I.V. Kookolnik). In Church paintings of the 1830s the \\\"Russian\\\" style, oriented at the monuments of the past, originated not in the academic school itself, but in the adminicular activity, that is, as a by-product of the artistic and archaeological studies of F.G. Solntsev. A.N. Olenin, the President of the Academy of Arts, on whose intiative these studies were performed, envisaged their outcome as \\\"the complete painting course of archaeology and ethnography for the artists\\\". This course was born in the 1830s during two works of the artist: the making of Church calendar and the painting of Terem Palace and the churches in the Moscow Kremlin.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"St. Tikhons' University Review. Series V. Christian Art\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"St. Tikhons' University Review. Series V. Christian Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturv202248.74-94\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St. Tikhons' University Review. Series V. Christian Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturv202248.74-94","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由彼得大帝开始并由他的继任者继续进行的俄罗斯快速欧洲化,在其他事情中表现出来,建立帝国美术学院和俄罗斯学术学校的诞生,其辉煌成就至少不是俄罗斯艺术传统的遗产,特别是圣像画,因为后者只被允许作为平民艺术存在。这种状况在尼古拉斯一世统治时期被认为是需要克服的,当时与传统的关系开始逐渐重建,特别是在教堂建筑的“拜占庭风格”中,由K.A. Ton在19世纪20年代末至30年代初应皇帝的要求发明。保守的意识形态,表现为所谓的官方民族主义理论(narodnost),从这个理论的作者S.S.乌瓦洛夫被任命为公共教育部长的时代开始,没有反映在学院派的教会绘画和属于历史流派的绘画中。本文主要是对19世纪30年代至40年代初典型的学院派教会画和传统圣像画的看法。这表明,与俄罗斯“历史”画家同时代的人,包括那些在教会的人,认为他们的呼召是对人民的承诺(民粹派),因为“有必要假设……一个人的个性,在保持其原创性的同时,将趋向于与欧洲艺术的总体和谐”;社会上至少有一部分人认为,在西方名校衰落的时候,只有在俄罗斯,绘画才表现出“生命和发展”。(输液Kookolnik跌倒)。在19世纪30年代的教堂绘画中,以过去的纪念碑为导向的“俄罗斯”风格不是起源于学术学校本身,而是起源于行政活动,也就是说,作为F.G.索伦采夫的艺术和考古研究的副产品。艺术学院院长A.N. Olenin在他的倡议下进行了这些研究,他设想他们的结果是“为艺术家提供完整的考古学和人种学绘画课程”。这门课程诞生于19世纪30年代艺术家的两件作品:制作教堂日历和画莫斯科克里姆林宫的特伦宫和教堂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In search of the lost tradition: towards a history of church painting of the 1830s — 1st half of the 1840s
Fast moving Europeanisation of Russia, started by Peter the Great and continued by his successors, showed itself, among other things, in founding the Imperial Academy of Fine Arts and in the birth of Russian academic school, whose brilliant achievements were not in the least the legacy of Russian art tradition, especially that of icon-painting, for the latter was only allowed to exist as the arts of the commoners. This state of things was regarded as something to overcome during the reign of Nicholas I, when gradual re-establishment of the ties with tradition begins, seen in particular in the "Byzantine style" in Church architecture, invented by K.A. Ton in late 1820s - early 1830s at the behest of the emperor. Conservative ideology, expressed as it was in the so called theory of the official nationhood (narodnost'), starting from the times when S.S. Uvarov, the author of this theory, was appointed Minister of Public Instruction, was not reflected, however, in the academic Church painting and in the paintings which belonged to historic genre as a whole. This article is focused on the views on the academic Church paintings and traditional icon-paintings that were typical of the educated class of the 1830s and early 1840s. It is shown that the contemporaries of Russian "historical" painters, including those in the Church, saw their calling in commitment to the people (narodnost'), for "there is a need to assume... one's own character, which, while retaining its originality, would tend toward the general harmony with the European Art"; at least a part of the society has come to the opinion that at the time of the decline of famous schools of the West, it is in Russia that paintings show "life and development". (I.V. Kookolnik). In Church paintings of the 1830s the "Russian" style, oriented at the monuments of the past, originated not in the academic school itself, but in the adminicular activity, that is, as a by-product of the artistic and archaeological studies of F.G. Solntsev. A.N. Olenin, the President of the Academy of Arts, on whose intiative these studies were performed, envisaged their outcome as "the complete painting course of archaeology and ethnography for the artists". This course was born in the 1830s during two works of the artist: the making of Church calendar and the painting of Terem Palace and the churches in the Moscow Kremlin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why is Jonah awake? An interpretation of the early Christian sarcophagus from the British museum in the modern art history Yaroslavl traditions in the classicist period of church wall-painting in Tver region "Now the Powers of Heavens invisibly serve with us…". On the history of the liturgical plots in mediaeval Russian art Annunciation church of Savior-Euthymius monastery in Suzdal. The question of dating Stylistic features of Karelian icon painting of the 17th — 18th centuries based on the material of hagiographic icons dedicated to st. Nicholas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1