基于矩阵分解和邻域的推荐系统的可扩展性评价

Nikita Taneja, H. Thakur
{"title":"基于矩阵分解和邻域的推荐系统的可扩展性评价","authors":"Nikita Taneja, H. Thakur","doi":"10.5815/ijitcs.2023.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recommendation Systems are everywhere, from offline shopping malls to major e-commerce websites, all use recommendation systems to enhance customer experience and grow profit. With a growing customer base, the requirement to store their interest, behavior and respond accordingly requires plenty of scalability. Thus, it is very important for companies to select a scalable recommender system, which can provide the recommendations not just accurately but with low latency as well. This paper focuses on the comparison between the four methods KMeans, KNN, SVD, and SVD++ to find out the better algorithm in terms of scalability. We have analyzed the methods on different parameters i.e., Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Precision, Recall and Running Time (Scalability). Results are elaborated such that selection becomes quite easy depending upon the user requirements.","PeriodicalId":130361,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Scalability of Matrix Factorization and Neighborhood Based Recommender Systems\",\"authors\":\"Nikita Taneja, H. Thakur\",\"doi\":\"10.5815/ijitcs.2023.01.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recommendation Systems are everywhere, from offline shopping malls to major e-commerce websites, all use recommendation systems to enhance customer experience and grow profit. With a growing customer base, the requirement to store their interest, behavior and respond accordingly requires plenty of scalability. Thus, it is very important for companies to select a scalable recommender system, which can provide the recommendations not just accurately but with low latency as well. This paper focuses on the comparison between the four methods KMeans, KNN, SVD, and SVD++ to find out the better algorithm in terms of scalability. We have analyzed the methods on different parameters i.e., Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Precision, Recall and Running Time (Scalability). Results are elaborated such that selection becomes quite easy depending upon the user requirements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2023.01.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5815/ijitcs.2023.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

推荐系统无处不在,从线下购物中心到大型电子商务网站,都使用推荐系统来提升客户体验和增加利润。随着客户群的增长,需要存储他们的兴趣、行为和相应的响应,这需要大量的可扩展性。因此,对于公司来说,选择一个可扩展的推荐系统是非常重要的,它不仅可以准确地提供推荐,而且延迟也很低。本文重点对KMeans、KNN、SVD和svd++四种方法进行比较,找出在可扩展性方面更好的算法。我们分析了不同参数的方法,即均方根误差(RMSE),平均绝对误差(MAE),精度,召回率和运行时间(可扩展性)。结果详细说明,选择变得相当容易,取决于用户的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating the Scalability of Matrix Factorization and Neighborhood Based Recommender Systems
Recommendation Systems are everywhere, from offline shopping malls to major e-commerce websites, all use recommendation systems to enhance customer experience and grow profit. With a growing customer base, the requirement to store their interest, behavior and respond accordingly requires plenty of scalability. Thus, it is very important for companies to select a scalable recommender system, which can provide the recommendations not just accurately but with low latency as well. This paper focuses on the comparison between the four methods KMeans, KNN, SVD, and SVD++ to find out the better algorithm in terms of scalability. We have analyzed the methods on different parameters i.e., Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Precision, Recall and Running Time (Scalability). Results are elaborated such that selection becomes quite easy depending upon the user requirements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Healthcare Provision in Conflict Zones: Queuing System Models for Mobile and Flexible Medical Care Units with a Limited Number of Treatment Stations A Machine Learning Based Intelligent Diabetic and Hypertensive Patient Prediction Scheme and A Mobile Application for Patients Assistance Mimicking Nature: Analysis of Dragonfly Pursuit Strategies Using LSTM and Kalman Filter Securing the Internet of Things: Evaluating Machine Learning Algorithms for Detecting IoT Cyberattacks Using CIC-IoT2023 Dataset Analyzing Test Performance of BSIT Students and Question Quality: A Study on Item Difficulty Index and Item Discrimination Index for Test Question Improvement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1