{"title":"罗马,帝国起源","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780190922467-0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rome was not built in one day. The eternal city was founded in 753 BCE and only few remains dating from the Archaic period survive. The Republican era (from 509 BCE, when the last king was overthrown, to 31 BCE, when Octavian/Augustus became the sole ruler of an empire that extended over three continents) as well as the imperial age, which lasted until Late Antiquity, were characterized by a constant renewal of architectural forms and building techniques, as a consequence of political and social developments. The expansion of the city was never the object of urban planning as we know it today. The cityscape was constantly remodeled thanks to a series of building programs conceived for political reasons and often originating from devastating fires. Unlike Pompeii, Rome is not a dead city and many ancient buildings were reused after Late Antiquity; therefore, countless contributions on its architecture originate not only from excavations but also from architectural surveys and “digs” in the archives. Indeed, the eternal city is a historical palimpsest, with the remains of three thousand years of art and architecture, pagan and Christian, profoundly intermingled in its urban fabric, and not many people have the knowledge, insight, and experience to make sense of such a very demanding research environment. Despite the publication of many books on Roman architecture and building techniques, not a single work has been devoted to the architecture of the city of Rome exclusively. (An exception is Storia dell’Architettura Italiana: Architettura romana; I grandi monumenti di Roma [Hesberg and Zanker 2009, cited under Collections of Papers], which, however, is a collection of essays.) To offer a broader picture, most books deal with the city of Rome along with Roman Italy and the provinces of the empire. Whenever Rome is the only topic, its architecture is never examined from origins through empire and only a specific period or building is taken into consideration. In general, scholarship on Roman architecture has focused on building typologies, materials, construction techniques, issues of design, and urbanism. Ancient literary sources are almost fundamental (this is another important difference between Rome and other cities, such as Ostia or Pompeii) because the historical, political, and social context of Rome’s architecture is unique: suffice it to mention all the monuments—arches, porticoes, temples—related to the triumphal procession, which was held in Rome exclusively, or were built after a successful military campaign with the spoils of war. Yet, a widespread assumption is that Rome is easy to investigate and understand. In reality, the substantial lack of scientific monographs on the majority of ancient Rome’s architectural monuments is explained by the painstaking work and the long time necessary for such studies. The works listed and annotated in this article deal with Rome’s architecture from the Archaic period to Late Antiquity, when Rome became a Christian city, and with the area included into the city walls of the late 3rd century CE. This article is not meant to be a digest of buildings but, rather, it gives a selection of the most important works of architecture published in the last few decades, and not exclusively in English. Although the study of Rome’s architecture is necessarily intertwined with archaeological excavations, this is not a bibliography of the latest archaeological campaigns and not because digs, stratigraphies, and material culture do not matter: more simply, the present article deals with Rome’s architecture exclusively.","PeriodicalId":381256,"journal":{"name":"Architecture, Planning, and Preservation","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rome, Origins Through Empire\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/obo/9780190922467-0059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rome was not built in one day. The eternal city was founded in 753 BCE and only few remains dating from the Archaic period survive. The Republican era (from 509 BCE, when the last king was overthrown, to 31 BCE, when Octavian/Augustus became the sole ruler of an empire that extended over three continents) as well as the imperial age, which lasted until Late Antiquity, were characterized by a constant renewal of architectural forms and building techniques, as a consequence of political and social developments. The expansion of the city was never the object of urban planning as we know it today. The cityscape was constantly remodeled thanks to a series of building programs conceived for political reasons and often originating from devastating fires. Unlike Pompeii, Rome is not a dead city and many ancient buildings were reused after Late Antiquity; therefore, countless contributions on its architecture originate not only from excavations but also from architectural surveys and “digs” in the archives. Indeed, the eternal city is a historical palimpsest, with the remains of three thousand years of art and architecture, pagan and Christian, profoundly intermingled in its urban fabric, and not many people have the knowledge, insight, and experience to make sense of such a very demanding research environment. Despite the publication of many books on Roman architecture and building techniques, not a single work has been devoted to the architecture of the city of Rome exclusively. (An exception is Storia dell’Architettura Italiana: Architettura romana; I grandi monumenti di Roma [Hesberg and Zanker 2009, cited under Collections of Papers], which, however, is a collection of essays.) To offer a broader picture, most books deal with the city of Rome along with Roman Italy and the provinces of the empire. Whenever Rome is the only topic, its architecture is never examined from origins through empire and only a specific period or building is taken into consideration. In general, scholarship on Roman architecture has focused on building typologies, materials, construction techniques, issues of design, and urbanism. Ancient literary sources are almost fundamental (this is another important difference between Rome and other cities, such as Ostia or Pompeii) because the historical, political, and social context of Rome’s architecture is unique: suffice it to mention all the monuments—arches, porticoes, temples—related to the triumphal procession, which was held in Rome exclusively, or were built after a successful military campaign with the spoils of war. Yet, a widespread assumption is that Rome is easy to investigate and understand. In reality, the substantial lack of scientific monographs on the majority of ancient Rome’s architectural monuments is explained by the painstaking work and the long time necessary for such studies. The works listed and annotated in this article deal with Rome’s architecture from the Archaic period to Late Antiquity, when Rome became a Christian city, and with the area included into the city walls of the late 3rd century CE. This article is not meant to be a digest of buildings but, rather, it gives a selection of the most important works of architecture published in the last few decades, and not exclusively in English. Although the study of Rome’s architecture is necessarily intertwined with archaeological excavations, this is not a bibliography of the latest archaeological campaigns and not because digs, stratigraphies, and material culture do not matter: more simply, the present article deals with Rome’s architecture exclusively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":381256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Architecture, Planning, and Preservation\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Architecture, Planning, and Preservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780190922467-0059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architecture, Planning, and Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780190922467-0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
冰冻三尺非一日之寒。这座永恒之城建于公元前753年,只有少数古代遗迹幸存下来。共和时代(从公元前509年,最后一个国王被推翻,到公元前31年,屋大维/奥古斯都成为一个横跨三大洲的帝国的唯一统治者)以及帝国时代,一直持续到古代晚期,其特点是建筑形式和建筑技术的不断更新,这是政治和社会发展的结果。城市的扩张从来不是我们今天所知道的城市规划的目标。由于政治原因而构思的一系列建筑项目,城市景观不断被改造,这些项目往往源于毁灭性的火灾。与庞贝不同,罗马并不是一座死寂的城市,许多古代建筑在上古晚期之后被重新使用;因此,对其建筑的无数贡献不仅来自发掘,还来自建筑调查和档案中的“挖掘”。的确,这座永恒之城是一座历史的重写本,三千年来的艺术和建筑遗迹,无论是异教的还是基督教的,都深深地交织在它的城市结构中,没有多少人有足够的知识、洞察力和经验来理解这样一个非常苛刻的研究环境。尽管出版了许多关于罗马建筑和建筑技术的书籍,但没有一本专门研究罗马城建筑的作品。(一个例外是意大利建筑博物馆:罗马建筑博物馆;I grandi monumenti di Roma [Hesberg and Zanker 2009,引自文集],然而,这是一本文集。)为了提供一个更广泛的画面,大多数书籍都是关于罗马城、罗马意大利和帝国的省份的。当罗马是唯一的主题时,它的建筑从来没有从起源到帝国进行研究,只有一个特定的时期或建筑被考虑在内。总的来说,罗马建筑的学术研究主要集中在建筑类型学、材料、建筑技术、设计问题和城市化。古代文献来源几乎是基本的(这是罗马与奥斯蒂亚或庞贝等其他城市之间的另一个重要区别),因为罗马建筑的历史、政治和社会背景是独一无二的:只要提到所有与胜利游行有关的纪念碑——拱门、门廊、寺庙就足够了,这些胜利游行只在罗马举行,或者是在一次成功的军事行动后建造的战利品。然而,一个普遍的假设是,罗马很容易调查和理解。实际上,对大多数古罗马建筑纪念碑的科学专著的严重缺乏,是由于这些研究需要艰苦的工作和漫长的时间。本文中列出和注释的作品涉及从古代时期到古代晚期的罗马建筑,当罗马成为一个基督教城市时,该地区在公元3世纪晚期被纳入城墙。这篇文章并不是对建筑的摘要,而是对过去几十年出版的最重要的建筑作品的选择,而且不是全英文的。虽然对罗马建筑的研究必然与考古发掘交织在一起,但本文并不是最新考古活动的参考书目,也不是因为挖掘、地层学和物质文化无关紧要:更简单地说,本文只讨论罗马的建筑。
Rome was not built in one day. The eternal city was founded in 753 BCE and only few remains dating from the Archaic period survive. The Republican era (from 509 BCE, when the last king was overthrown, to 31 BCE, when Octavian/Augustus became the sole ruler of an empire that extended over three continents) as well as the imperial age, which lasted until Late Antiquity, were characterized by a constant renewal of architectural forms and building techniques, as a consequence of political and social developments. The expansion of the city was never the object of urban planning as we know it today. The cityscape was constantly remodeled thanks to a series of building programs conceived for political reasons and often originating from devastating fires. Unlike Pompeii, Rome is not a dead city and many ancient buildings were reused after Late Antiquity; therefore, countless contributions on its architecture originate not only from excavations but also from architectural surveys and “digs” in the archives. Indeed, the eternal city is a historical palimpsest, with the remains of three thousand years of art and architecture, pagan and Christian, profoundly intermingled in its urban fabric, and not many people have the knowledge, insight, and experience to make sense of such a very demanding research environment. Despite the publication of many books on Roman architecture and building techniques, not a single work has been devoted to the architecture of the city of Rome exclusively. (An exception is Storia dell’Architettura Italiana: Architettura romana; I grandi monumenti di Roma [Hesberg and Zanker 2009, cited under Collections of Papers], which, however, is a collection of essays.) To offer a broader picture, most books deal with the city of Rome along with Roman Italy and the provinces of the empire. Whenever Rome is the only topic, its architecture is never examined from origins through empire and only a specific period or building is taken into consideration. In general, scholarship on Roman architecture has focused on building typologies, materials, construction techniques, issues of design, and urbanism. Ancient literary sources are almost fundamental (this is another important difference between Rome and other cities, such as Ostia or Pompeii) because the historical, political, and social context of Rome’s architecture is unique: suffice it to mention all the monuments—arches, porticoes, temples—related to the triumphal procession, which was held in Rome exclusively, or were built after a successful military campaign with the spoils of war. Yet, a widespread assumption is that Rome is easy to investigate and understand. In reality, the substantial lack of scientific monographs on the majority of ancient Rome’s architectural monuments is explained by the painstaking work and the long time necessary for such studies. The works listed and annotated in this article deal with Rome’s architecture from the Archaic period to Late Antiquity, when Rome became a Christian city, and with the area included into the city walls of the late 3rd century CE. This article is not meant to be a digest of buildings but, rather, it gives a selection of the most important works of architecture published in the last few decades, and not exclusively in English. Although the study of Rome’s architecture is necessarily intertwined with archaeological excavations, this is not a bibliography of the latest archaeological campaigns and not because digs, stratigraphies, and material culture do not matter: more simply, the present article deals with Rome’s architecture exclusively.