重新审视位置一致性模型:问题、解决方案与展望

Guoping Long, Nan Yuan, Dongrui Fan
{"title":"重新审视位置一致性模型:问题、解决方案与展望","authors":"Guoping Long, Nan Yuan, Dongrui Fan","doi":"10.1109/PDCAT.2008.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Location consistency (LC) is a weak memory consistency model which is defined entirely on partial order execution semantics of parallel programs. Compared with sequential consistency (SC), LC is scalable and provides ample theoretical parallelism. This makes LC an interesting memory model in the upcoming many-core parallel processing era. Previous work has pointed out that LC does not guarantee SC execution behavior for all data race free programs. In this paper, we compare the semantics of LC with PRAM consistency and memory coherence, and prove that LC is strictly weaker than PRAM consistency. For data race free programs, we prove that the semantics of LC is equivalent to memory coherence. In addition, by introducing memory ordering semantics into LC judiciously, we prove that the enhanced model is equivalent to SC for data race free programs. Finally, we discuss possible solutions for adding reasoning rules for LC-like weak memory models.","PeriodicalId":282779,"journal":{"name":"2008 Ninth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Location Consistency Model Revisited: Problem, Solution and Prospects\",\"authors\":\"Guoping Long, Nan Yuan, Dongrui Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PDCAT.2008.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Location consistency (LC) is a weak memory consistency model which is defined entirely on partial order execution semantics of parallel programs. Compared with sequential consistency (SC), LC is scalable and provides ample theoretical parallelism. This makes LC an interesting memory model in the upcoming many-core parallel processing era. Previous work has pointed out that LC does not guarantee SC execution behavior for all data race free programs. In this paper, we compare the semantics of LC with PRAM consistency and memory coherence, and prove that LC is strictly weaker than PRAM consistency. For data race free programs, we prove that the semantics of LC is equivalent to memory coherence. In addition, by introducing memory ordering semantics into LC judiciously, we prove that the enhanced model is equivalent to SC for data race free programs. Finally, we discuss possible solutions for adding reasoning rules for LC-like weak memory models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":282779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 Ninth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 Ninth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDCAT.2008.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Ninth International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing, Applications and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PDCAT.2008.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

位置一致性(LC)是一种弱内存一致性模型,它完全基于并行程序的部分顺序执行语义来定义。与顺序一致性(SC)相比,LC具有可扩展性,并提供了充足的理论并行性。这使得LC在即将到来的多核并行处理时代成为一个有趣的内存模型。以前的工作已经指出,LC并不能保证SC对所有无数据竞争的程序的执行行为。本文将LC的语义与PRAM一致性和记忆一致性进行了比较,证明了LC的语义严格弱于PRAM一致性。对于无数据竞争的程序,我们证明了LC的语义等价于内存相干性。此外,通过明智地将内存排序语义引入LC,我们证明了对于无数据竞争的程序,增强模型等价于SC。最后,我们讨论了为类lc弱内存模型添加推理规则的可能解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Location Consistency Model Revisited: Problem, Solution and Prospects
Location consistency (LC) is a weak memory consistency model which is defined entirely on partial order execution semantics of parallel programs. Compared with sequential consistency (SC), LC is scalable and provides ample theoretical parallelism. This makes LC an interesting memory model in the upcoming many-core parallel processing era. Previous work has pointed out that LC does not guarantee SC execution behavior for all data race free programs. In this paper, we compare the semantics of LC with PRAM consistency and memory coherence, and prove that LC is strictly weaker than PRAM consistency. For data race free programs, we prove that the semantics of LC is equivalent to memory coherence. In addition, by introducing memory ordering semantics into LC judiciously, we prove that the enhanced model is equivalent to SC for data race free programs. Finally, we discuss possible solutions for adding reasoning rules for LC-like weak memory models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Case Studies in Computer Network Measurement Advances in the ProGenGrid Workflow Management System Finding Interaction Partners Using Attitude-Based Decision Strategies Agent Migration and Communication in WSNs Portable Object Thermal Awareness: Modeling Intelligent Sensor Networks for Cool Store Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1