股票风险溢价比你想象的要低:一种新方法的实证估计

James J. Claus, Jacob K. Thomas
{"title":"股票风险溢价比你想象的要低:一种新方法的实证估计","authors":"James J. Claus, Jacob K. Thomas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.165335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We offer ex ante estimates of the equity risk premium based on forecasted accounting numbers. Although our approach is isomorphic to dividend growth models, it generates various diagnostics that help to narrow the range of reasonable assumed growth rates. Our results, based on IBES consensus earnings forecasts over the 1985-1998 period, contrast sharply with those of prior research. Our estimates of risk premium are considerably lower than (about 3 percent) the estimates commonly cited (about 8 percent), and are also more stationary over time. This result has important implications both for academe (e.g., the equity premium puzzle) as well as practice (e.g., discount rates for valuation and over-valued stock markets).","PeriodicalId":180033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Abstracts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Equity Risk Premium is Lower than You Think it is: Empirical Estimates from a New Approach\",\"authors\":\"James J. Claus, Jacob K. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.165335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We offer ex ante estimates of the equity risk premium based on forecasted accounting numbers. Although our approach is isomorphic to dividend growth models, it generates various diagnostics that help to narrow the range of reasonable assumed growth rates. Our results, based on IBES consensus earnings forecasts over the 1985-1998 period, contrast sharply with those of prior research. Our estimates of risk premium are considerably lower than (about 3 percent) the estimates commonly cited (about 8 percent), and are also more stationary over time. This result has important implications both for academe (e.g., the equity premium puzzle) as well as practice (e.g., discount rates for valuation and over-valued stock markets).\",\"PeriodicalId\":180033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Abstracts\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"66\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Abstracts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.165335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Abstracts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.165335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

摘要

我们根据预测的会计数字提供股权风险溢价的事前估计。虽然我们的方法与股息增长模型是同构的,但它产生了各种诊断,有助于缩小合理假设增长率的范围。我们的研究结果基于1985-1998年期间IBES的共识收益预测,与之前的研究结果形成鲜明对比。我们对风险溢价的估计比通常引用的估计(大约3%)要低得多(大约8%),而且随着时间的推移也更加平稳。这一结果对学术界(例如,股票溢价之谜)和实践(例如,估值贴现率和估值过高的股票市场)都具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Equity Risk Premium is Lower than You Think it is: Empirical Estimates from a New Approach
We offer ex ante estimates of the equity risk premium based on forecasted accounting numbers. Although our approach is isomorphic to dividend growth models, it generates various diagnostics that help to narrow the range of reasonable assumed growth rates. Our results, based on IBES consensus earnings forecasts over the 1985-1998 period, contrast sharply with those of prior research. Our estimates of risk premium are considerably lower than (about 3 percent) the estimates commonly cited (about 8 percent), and are also more stationary over time. This result has important implications both for academe (e.g., the equity premium puzzle) as well as practice (e.g., discount rates for valuation and over-valued stock markets).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managerial Risk-Taking Incentives and Executive Stock Option Repricing: A Study of Us Casino Executives Determinants of Revenue Reporting Practices for Internet Firms Differences in Commercial Database Reported Earnings: Implications for Empirical Research The Association between Stock/Compensation Mix and Earnings Usefulness Evidence from Auditors About Managers' and Auditors' Earnings-Management Decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1