通过GeoGebra运用掌握式学习方法提高几何学习成绩

P. Khansila, Wannatida Yonwilad, Prapaporn Nongharnpituk, Suwannawat Thienyutthakul
{"title":"通过GeoGebra运用掌握式学习方法提高几何学习成绩","authors":"P. Khansila, Wannatida Yonwilad, Prapaporn Nongharnpituk, Suwannawat Thienyutthakul","doi":"10.5296/jei.v8i2.20494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of these quasi-experimental methods were to improve academic performance in geometry using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra for mathematics teacher students and to investigate students’ satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. The participants were divided into two groups, involving 30 and 29 students, respectively. The experimental group with 30 students received instruction in the mastery learning approach through GeoGebra, while the control group received a traditional education in learning geometry. At the end of the lessons, post-tests were administered to both groups. The statistical difference between the participant’s post-test academic performance in the experimental and control groups was analyzed with an independent sample t-test after examining the assumptions of this test, namely normality and homogeneity in each group, while percentages and means were used to assess the satisfaction of the experimental group. The instruments used were the Geometry Achievement Test (GAT), which consists of 2D and 3D dimensions, and a questionnaire with satisfied students. Results of the study indicated that the scores of academic performances in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Analysis of the questionnaire responses indicated a positive overall satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. On the other hand, instruction with a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra supported students’ learning of these subjects meaningfully and conceptually.","PeriodicalId":314203,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational Issues","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Academic Performance in Geometry Using a Mastery Learning Approach through GeoGebra\",\"authors\":\"P. Khansila, Wannatida Yonwilad, Prapaporn Nongharnpituk, Suwannawat Thienyutthakul\",\"doi\":\"10.5296/jei.v8i2.20494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objectives of these quasi-experimental methods were to improve academic performance in geometry using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra for mathematics teacher students and to investigate students’ satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. The participants were divided into two groups, involving 30 and 29 students, respectively. The experimental group with 30 students received instruction in the mastery learning approach through GeoGebra, while the control group received a traditional education in learning geometry. At the end of the lessons, post-tests were administered to both groups. The statistical difference between the participant’s post-test academic performance in the experimental and control groups was analyzed with an independent sample t-test after examining the assumptions of this test, namely normality and homogeneity in each group, while percentages and means were used to assess the satisfaction of the experimental group. The instruments used were the Geometry Achievement Test (GAT), which consists of 2D and 3D dimensions, and a questionnaire with satisfied students. Results of the study indicated that the scores of academic performances in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Analysis of the questionnaire responses indicated a positive overall satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. On the other hand, instruction with a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra supported students’ learning of these subjects meaningfully and conceptually.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Educational Issues\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Educational Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i2.20494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5296/jei.v8i2.20494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这些准实验方法的目的是提高数学教师学生使用GeoGebra掌握学习方法在几何方面的学习成绩,并调查学生使用GeoGebra掌握学习方法在几何方面的满意度。参与者被分成两组,分别有30名和29名学生。实验组30名学生通过GeoGebra学习掌握式学习方法,对照组接受传统几何教育。在课程结束时,两组都进行了后测试。实验组与对照组受试者测试后学业成绩的统计差异在检验各组正态性和齐性假设后,采用独立样本t检验进行分析,实验组满意度采用百分比和均值评估。使用的工具是几何成绩测试(GAT),由二维和三维维度组成,并对满意的学生进行问卷调查。研究结果表明,实验组学生的学业成绩显著高于对照组。问卷调查结果的分析表明,通过GeoGebra在几何中使用掌握学习方法的总体满意度为正。另一方面,通过GeoGebra采用掌握式学习方法的教学支持了学生对这些学科的有意义和概念性的学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Improving Academic Performance in Geometry Using a Mastery Learning Approach through GeoGebra
The objectives of these quasi-experimental methods were to improve academic performance in geometry using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra for mathematics teacher students and to investigate students’ satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. The participants were divided into two groups, involving 30 and 29 students, respectively. The experimental group with 30 students received instruction in the mastery learning approach through GeoGebra, while the control group received a traditional education in learning geometry. At the end of the lessons, post-tests were administered to both groups. The statistical difference between the participant’s post-test academic performance in the experimental and control groups was analyzed with an independent sample t-test after examining the assumptions of this test, namely normality and homogeneity in each group, while percentages and means were used to assess the satisfaction of the experimental group. The instruments used were the Geometry Achievement Test (GAT), which consists of 2D and 3D dimensions, and a questionnaire with satisfied students. Results of the study indicated that the scores of academic performances in the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Analysis of the questionnaire responses indicated a positive overall satisfaction with using a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra in geometry. On the other hand, instruction with a mastery learning approach through GeoGebra supported students’ learning of these subjects meaningfully and conceptually.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Experimental Plan: Teaching of Astronomical Clock Tower under View of New Liberal Arts Perspective Perceptions of Thai Healthcare Instructors on Components of Interprofessional Education: A Phenomenological Study Research on Music Education of “Double Tutor System” for Postgraduate Students in China and Belarus Best Teaching and Learning Approaches through the Eyes of Thai EFL Preservice Teachers Coaches’ Perspectives about the Reasons behind Dropping Out of Sports in Wrestlers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1