{"title":"也可以在纸条上和舞台上谴责某个大人物","authors":"Yulia Mevissen","doi":"10.1353/gyr.2022.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In 1751, Christian Fürchtegott Gellert writes both the letter writing manual Briefe, nebst einer praktischen Abhandlung von dem guten Geschmacke in Briefen as well as the treatise Pro comoedia commovente in defense of the genre comédie larmoyante. While the first earns him ardent admirers, the latter receives heavy criticism from Gotthold Ephraim Lessing. This article investigates the interplay between movement (Rührung), medium, and genre, as well as the role of Rührung in the game of discursive politics. Focusing on Gellert's notions of Rührung and of a \"natural\" style, the article argues that Gellert institutes a normative aesthetic paradigm that belongs to a written culture and builds on \"symptoms\" of movement, which, for instance, can already be found in Johann Jacob Breitinger's work.","PeriodicalId":385309,"journal":{"name":"Goethe Yearbook","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medien- und Emotionspolitik der Rührung: Rührung im Brief und auf der Bühne bei Christian Fürchtegott Gellert\",\"authors\":\"Yulia Mevissen\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/gyr.2022.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In 1751, Christian Fürchtegott Gellert writes both the letter writing manual Briefe, nebst einer praktischen Abhandlung von dem guten Geschmacke in Briefen as well as the treatise Pro comoedia commovente in defense of the genre comédie larmoyante. While the first earns him ardent admirers, the latter receives heavy criticism from Gotthold Ephraim Lessing. This article investigates the interplay between movement (Rührung), medium, and genre, as well as the role of Rührung in the game of discursive politics. Focusing on Gellert's notions of Rührung and of a \\\"natural\\\" style, the article argues that Gellert institutes a normative aesthetic paradigm that belongs to a written culture and builds on \\\"symptoms\\\" of movement, which, for instance, can already be found in Johann Jacob Breitinger's work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Goethe Yearbook\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2022.0012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Goethe Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/gyr.2022.0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:1751年,基督教作家 rchtegott Gellert撰写了书信写作手册《brief》、《nebst einer praktischen Abhandlung von dem guten Geschmacke In Briefen》和论文《procomoedia commovente》,为comemodie larmoyante这一流派辩护。虽然前者为他赢得了热烈的崇拜者,但后者却受到了Gotthold Ephraim Lessing的严厉批评。本文探讨运动、媒介、体裁三者之间的相互作用,以及运动在话语政治博弈中的作用。文章聚焦于盖勒特关于r hrung和“自然”风格的概念,认为盖勒特建立了一种规范的美学范式,这种范式属于一种书面文化,并建立在运动的“症状”之上,例如,在约翰·雅各布·布莱廷格的作品中已经可以找到。
Medien- und Emotionspolitik der Rührung: Rührung im Brief und auf der Bühne bei Christian Fürchtegott Gellert
Abstract:In 1751, Christian Fürchtegott Gellert writes both the letter writing manual Briefe, nebst einer praktischen Abhandlung von dem guten Geschmacke in Briefen as well as the treatise Pro comoedia commovente in defense of the genre comédie larmoyante. While the first earns him ardent admirers, the latter receives heavy criticism from Gotthold Ephraim Lessing. This article investigates the interplay between movement (Rührung), medium, and genre, as well as the role of Rührung in the game of discursive politics. Focusing on Gellert's notions of Rührung and of a "natural" style, the article argues that Gellert institutes a normative aesthetic paradigm that belongs to a written culture and builds on "symptoms" of movement, which, for instance, can already be found in Johann Jacob Breitinger's work.