冠心病患者心脏脂肪沉积的预后意义

O. M. Uryasyev, A. V. Solov’yeva, Aleksey V. Cheskidov, Anastasiya A. Filimonova, E. А. Nikiforova
{"title":"冠心病患者心脏脂肪沉积的预后意义","authors":"O. M. Uryasyev, A. V. Solov’yeva, Aleksey V. Cheskidov, Anastasiya A. Filimonova, E. А. Nikiforova","doi":"10.17816/pavlovj322796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Obesity is one of the leading risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases. At present, of the greatest scientific interest are local deposits of adipose tissue as a possible morphological substrate for the development of this group of diseases. Along with the traditional risk factors, one more risk factor for a poor prognosis of cardiovascular disease can be a change in the thickness of the epicardial fat (EF) and of the interatrial septum (IAS) in case of its lipomatosis. \nAIM: To study the significance of EF and of IAS thickness as markers of cardiovascular risk in coronary heart disease. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 116 individuals with coronary heart disease (55 men (47%) and 61 women (53%), mean age 68 [61; 72] years). Thickness of EF and IAS was evaluated by the method of echocardiography. The frequency of poor outcomes was evaluated using KaplanMeier method, ROC-curve analysis. The differences were considered statistically significant at p 0.05. \nRESULTS: In the group of patients with unstable angina, the threshold value of IAS thickness was 0.7 cm (p 0.001), and of EF thickness 0.8 cm (2 = 10.89, p = 0.001), in the group of patients with myocardial infarction 0.7 cm (p 0.001) and 0.8 cm (p 0.001), respectively. In the group of patient with unstable angina, IAS thickness 0.7 cm (2 = 10.3, p = 0.0013) and EF thickness 0.8 cm (2 = 10.89, p = 0.001) demonstrate a poor prognosis in comparison with the parameters below the threshold values. In the group of patients with myocardial infarction, IAS thickness 0.7 cm (2 = 8.4, p = 0.005) and EF 0.8 cm (2 = 9.66, p = 0.0019) demonstrate poor prognosis in comparison with the parameters below the threshold values. \nCONCLUSION: In unstable angina and myocardial infarction, the value of IAS thickness 0.7 cm (p = 0.0013 and p = 0.005, respectively) and of EF thickness 0.8 cm (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0019, respectively) present a poor prognosis compared to lower values. It is recommended that EF and IAS thickness be determined in echocardiography as an additional marker for a poor prognosis in coronary heart disease.","PeriodicalId":113364,"journal":{"name":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Significance of Cardiac Fat Deposits in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease\",\"authors\":\"O. M. Uryasyev, A. V. Solov’yeva, Aleksey V. Cheskidov, Anastasiya A. Filimonova, E. А. Nikiforova\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/pavlovj322796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Obesity is one of the leading risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases. At present, of the greatest scientific interest are local deposits of adipose tissue as a possible morphological substrate for the development of this group of diseases. Along with the traditional risk factors, one more risk factor for a poor prognosis of cardiovascular disease can be a change in the thickness of the epicardial fat (EF) and of the interatrial septum (IAS) in case of its lipomatosis. \\nAIM: To study the significance of EF and of IAS thickness as markers of cardiovascular risk in coronary heart disease. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 116 individuals with coronary heart disease (55 men (47%) and 61 women (53%), mean age 68 [61; 72] years). Thickness of EF and IAS was evaluated by the method of echocardiography. The frequency of poor outcomes was evaluated using KaplanMeier method, ROC-curve analysis. The differences were considered statistically significant at p 0.05. \\nRESULTS: In the group of patients with unstable angina, the threshold value of IAS thickness was 0.7 cm (p 0.001), and of EF thickness 0.8 cm (2 = 10.89, p = 0.001), in the group of patients with myocardial infarction 0.7 cm (p 0.001) and 0.8 cm (p 0.001), respectively. In the group of patient with unstable angina, IAS thickness 0.7 cm (2 = 10.3, p = 0.0013) and EF thickness 0.8 cm (2 = 10.89, p = 0.001) demonstrate a poor prognosis in comparison with the parameters below the threshold values. In the group of patients with myocardial infarction, IAS thickness 0.7 cm (2 = 8.4, p = 0.005) and EF 0.8 cm (2 = 9.66, p = 0.0019) demonstrate poor prognosis in comparison with the parameters below the threshold values. \\nCONCLUSION: In unstable angina and myocardial infarction, the value of IAS thickness 0.7 cm (p = 0.0013 and p = 0.005, respectively) and of EF thickness 0.8 cm (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0019, respectively) present a poor prognosis compared to lower values. It is recommended that EF and IAS thickness be determined in echocardiography as an additional marker for a poor prognosis in coronary heart disease.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj322796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/pavlovj322796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:肥胖是心血管疾病发展的主要危险因素之一。目前,最大的科学兴趣是脂肪组织的局部沉积作为这组疾病发展的可能形态学基础。除了传统的危险因素外,心血管疾病预后不良的另一个危险因素可能是心外膜脂肪(EF)和房间隔(IAS)脂肪化时厚度的变化。目的:探讨EF和IAS厚度作为冠心病心血管危险指标的意义。材料和方法:研究纳入116例冠心病患者,其中男性55例(47%),女性61例(53%),平均年龄68岁[61;72年)。超声心动图法评价EF和IAS厚度。采用KaplanMeier法、roc曲线分析评估不良预后的频率。p < 0.05认为差异有统计学意义。结果:不稳定心绞痛组IAS厚度阈值为0.7 cm (p 0.001), EF厚度阈值为0.8 cm (2 = 10.89, p = 0.001),心肌梗死组IAS厚度阈值为0.7 cm (p 0.001), EF厚度阈值为0.8 cm (p 0.001)。在不稳定型心绞痛患者组中,IAS厚度0.7 cm (2 = 10.3, p = 0.0013)和EF厚度0.8 cm (2 = 10.89, p = 0.001)与低于阈值的参数相比,预后较差。在心肌梗死患者组中,IAS厚度0.7 cm (2 = 8.4, p = 0.005)和EF 0.8 cm (2 = 9.66, p = 0.0019)与低于阈值的参数相比,预后较差。结论:在不稳定型心绞痛和心肌梗死中,IAS厚度为0.7 cm (p = 0.0013和p = 0.005)和EF厚度为0.8 cm (p = 0.001和p = 0.0019)的患者预后较差。建议在超声心动图中确定EF和IAS厚度,作为冠心病预后不良的额外标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prognostic Significance of Cardiac Fat Deposits in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is one of the leading risk factors for the development of cardiovascular diseases. At present, of the greatest scientific interest are local deposits of adipose tissue as a possible morphological substrate for the development of this group of diseases. Along with the traditional risk factors, one more risk factor for a poor prognosis of cardiovascular disease can be a change in the thickness of the epicardial fat (EF) and of the interatrial septum (IAS) in case of its lipomatosis. AIM: To study the significance of EF and of IAS thickness as markers of cardiovascular risk in coronary heart disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 116 individuals with coronary heart disease (55 men (47%) and 61 women (53%), mean age 68 [61; 72] years). Thickness of EF and IAS was evaluated by the method of echocardiography. The frequency of poor outcomes was evaluated using KaplanMeier method, ROC-curve analysis. The differences were considered statistically significant at p 0.05. RESULTS: In the group of patients with unstable angina, the threshold value of IAS thickness was 0.7 cm (p 0.001), and of EF thickness 0.8 cm (2 = 10.89, p = 0.001), in the group of patients with myocardial infarction 0.7 cm (p 0.001) and 0.8 cm (p 0.001), respectively. In the group of patient with unstable angina, IAS thickness 0.7 cm (2 = 10.3, p = 0.0013) and EF thickness 0.8 cm (2 = 10.89, p = 0.001) demonstrate a poor prognosis in comparison with the parameters below the threshold values. In the group of patients with myocardial infarction, IAS thickness 0.7 cm (2 = 8.4, p = 0.005) and EF 0.8 cm (2 = 9.66, p = 0.0019) demonstrate poor prognosis in comparison with the parameters below the threshold values. CONCLUSION: In unstable angina and myocardial infarction, the value of IAS thickness 0.7 cm (p = 0.0013 and p = 0.005, respectively) and of EF thickness 0.8 cm (p = 0.001 and p = 0.0019, respectively) present a poor prognosis compared to lower values. It is recommended that EF and IAS thickness be determined in echocardiography as an additional marker for a poor prognosis in coronary heart disease.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of Effectiveness of Lesser Toe Surgical Correction Routine Coronary Angiography and Functional Cardiac Tests before Resection of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in Patients without Symptoms of Myocardial Infarction Elimination of Intestinal Hypoxia in Complex Treatment of Intestinal Failure (Case Report) Clinical Case of a Foreign Body in the Soft Tissues surrounding the Knee Joint: to Help the Practitione Breast Cancer Resistance Protein: Structure, Localization, Functions, Significance for Rational Pharmacotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1