通过程序聚类和缺陷预测评估软件质量

X. Tan, Xin Peng, Sen Pan, Wenyun Zhao
{"title":"通过程序聚类和缺陷预测评估软件质量","authors":"X. Tan, Xin Peng, Sen Pan, Wenyun Zhao","doi":"10.1109/WCRE.2011.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many empirical studies have shown that defect prediction models built on product metrics can be used to assess the quality of software modules. So far, most methods proposed in this direction predict defects by class or file. In this paper, we propose a novel software defect prediction method based on functional clusters of programs to improve the performance, especially the effort-aware performance, of defect prediction. In the method, we use proper-grained and problem-oriented program clusters as the basic units of defect prediction. To evaluate the effectiveness of the method, we conducted an experimental study on Eclipse 3.0. We found that, comparing with class-based models, cluster-based prediction models can significantly improve the recall (from 31.6% to 99.2%) and precision (from 73.8% to 91.6%) of defect prediction. According to the effort-aware evaluation, the effort needed to review code to find half of the total defects can be reduced by 6% if using cluster-based prediction models.","PeriodicalId":350863,"journal":{"name":"2011 18th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Software Quality by Program Clustering and Defect Prediction\",\"authors\":\"X. Tan, Xin Peng, Sen Pan, Wenyun Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/WCRE.2011.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many empirical studies have shown that defect prediction models built on product metrics can be used to assess the quality of software modules. So far, most methods proposed in this direction predict defects by class or file. In this paper, we propose a novel software defect prediction method based on functional clusters of programs to improve the performance, especially the effort-aware performance, of defect prediction. In the method, we use proper-grained and problem-oriented program clusters as the basic units of defect prediction. To evaluate the effectiveness of the method, we conducted an experimental study on Eclipse 3.0. We found that, comparing with class-based models, cluster-based prediction models can significantly improve the recall (from 31.6% to 99.2%) and precision (from 73.8% to 91.6%) of defect prediction. According to the effort-aware evaluation, the effort needed to review code to find half of the total defects can be reduced by 6% if using cluster-based prediction models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":350863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 18th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 18th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/WCRE.2011.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 18th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WCRE.2011.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

许多实证研究表明,建立在产品度量上的缺陷预测模型可以用来评估软件模块的质量。到目前为止,在这个方向上提出的大多数方法都是通过类或文件来预测缺陷的。本文提出了一种基于程序功能簇的软件缺陷预测方法,以提高缺陷预测的性能,特别是工作感知性能。在该方法中,我们使用适当粒度和面向问题的程序聚类作为缺陷预测的基本单元。为了评估该方法的有效性,我们在Eclipse 3.0上进行了实验研究。我们发现,与基于类的预测模型相比,基于聚类的预测模型可以显著提高缺陷预测的召回率(从31.6%提高到99.2%)和准确率(从73.8%提高到91.6%)。根据工作量感知评估,如果使用基于聚类的预测模型,审查代码以发现总缺陷的一半所需的工作量可以减少6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Software Quality by Program Clustering and Defect Prediction
Many empirical studies have shown that defect prediction models built on product metrics can be used to assess the quality of software modules. So far, most methods proposed in this direction predict defects by class or file. In this paper, we propose a novel software defect prediction method based on functional clusters of programs to improve the performance, especially the effort-aware performance, of defect prediction. In the method, we use proper-grained and problem-oriented program clusters as the basic units of defect prediction. To evaluate the effectiveness of the method, we conducted an experimental study on Eclipse 3.0. We found that, comparing with class-based models, cluster-based prediction models can significantly improve the recall (from 31.6% to 99.2%) and precision (from 73.8% to 91.6%) of defect prediction. According to the effort-aware evaluation, the effort needed to review code to find half of the total defects can be reduced by 6% if using cluster-based prediction models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reverse Engineering Co-maintenance Relationships Using Conceptual Analysis of Source Code Renovation by Machine-Assisted Program Transformation in Production Reporting and Integration Reasoning over the Evolution of Source Code Using Quantified Regular Path Expressions An Exploratory Study of Software Reverse Engineering in a Security Context Analyzing the Source Code of Multiple Software Variants for Reuse Potential
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1