{"title":"论Egemin软件产品线发展中的问题","authors":"B. Michalik, Danny Weyns, Wim Van Betsbrugge","doi":"10.1145/1985484.1985489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Egemin, an industrial manufacturer of logistic systems is adopting a Software Product Line (SPL) approach to manage the development of their product portfolio. However, due to the intrinsic complexity of the logistic systems and lack of explicitly documented architectural knowledge evolution of the products is error-prone. Faulty updates increase maintenance costs and harm the company's reputation. Therefore, Egemin searches for a systematic solution that can improve their SPL evolution strategy.","PeriodicalId":436409,"journal":{"name":"PLEASE '11","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the problems with evolving Egemin's software product line\",\"authors\":\"B. Michalik, Danny Weyns, Wim Van Betsbrugge\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1985484.1985489\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Egemin, an industrial manufacturer of logistic systems is adopting a Software Product Line (SPL) approach to manage the development of their product portfolio. However, due to the intrinsic complexity of the logistic systems and lack of explicitly documented architectural knowledge evolution of the products is error-prone. Faulty updates increase maintenance costs and harm the company's reputation. Therefore, Egemin searches for a systematic solution that can improve their SPL evolution strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":436409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLEASE '11\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLEASE '11\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1985484.1985489\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLEASE '11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1985484.1985489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the problems with evolving Egemin's software product line
Egemin, an industrial manufacturer of logistic systems is adopting a Software Product Line (SPL) approach to manage the development of their product portfolio. However, due to the intrinsic complexity of the logistic systems and lack of explicitly documented architectural knowledge evolution of the products is error-prone. Faulty updates increase maintenance costs and harm the company's reputation. Therefore, Egemin searches for a systematic solution that can improve their SPL evolution strategy.