Torjer A. Olsen, Bengt-Ove Andreassen
{"title":"”Urfolk” og ”mangfold” i skolens læreplaner","authors":"Torjer A. Olsen, Bengt-Ove Andreassen","doi":"10.7577/FLEKS.2248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since 1974, the curriculum for the Norwegian school has had a overarching part that puts the school and its content into a bigger social and political context. As such, this part of the curriculum is a highly political and ideological text that expresses the state's purpose and interest related to the school. This article looks into how indigenous people, minorities and diversity is represented in the general part of the curriculum from 1974 to 2017. The changing curricula show changes in the official politics and views on diversity. Through an analysis of the curricula we explore which terms and concepts that are used in the description of people and groups in Norwegian society. We focus primarily on the representation of the Sami, who move from being people in \"mixed language districts\" with limited rights, via being an \"ethnic minority\", to being an indigenous people with a set of rights. Further, we look into how the diverse society is represented, from the use of \"alien workers\", via \"immigrants\", to just \"diversity\". We argue that the concepts or strategies of politics of recognition and politics of integration respectively can be used to describe the curricula. Norway's educational policy towards minorities and indigenous people seems to exist between these two. In the end, this leave diversity competence as an important concept in the future Norwegian school.","PeriodicalId":179459,"journal":{"name":"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FLEKS - Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7577/FLEKS.2248","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

自1974年以来,挪威学校的课程一直是一个整体,将学校及其内容置于更大的社会和政治背景中。因此,课程的这一部分是一个高度政治化和意识形态的文本,表达了国家与学校有关的目的和利益。本文研究了1974年至2017年期间,土著人民、少数民族和多样性在课程的一般部分是如何体现的。课程的变化反映了官方政治和对多样性的看法的变化。通过对课程的分析,我们探索了在描述挪威社会中的人和群体时使用的术语和概念。我们主要关注萨米人的代表,他们从“混合语言区”的人,权利有限,从“少数民族”,到拥有一系列权利的土著人民。此外,我们还研究了多元化社会是如何被代表的,从“外来工人”的使用,到“移民”,再到仅仅是“多样性”。我们认为可以分别使用承认政治和整合政治的概念或策略来描述课程。挪威对少数民族和土著人民的教育政策似乎介于这两者之间。最后,这使得多元化能力成为未来挪威学校的一个重要概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
”Urfolk” og ”mangfold” i skolens læreplaner
Since 1974, the curriculum for the Norwegian school has had a overarching part that puts the school and its content into a bigger social and political context. As such, this part of the curriculum is a highly political and ideological text that expresses the state's purpose and interest related to the school. This article looks into how indigenous people, minorities and diversity is represented in the general part of the curriculum from 1974 to 2017. The changing curricula show changes in the official politics and views on diversity. Through an analysis of the curricula we explore which terms and concepts that are used in the description of people and groups in Norwegian society. We focus primarily on the representation of the Sami, who move from being people in "mixed language districts" with limited rights, via being an "ethnic minority", to being an indigenous people with a set of rights. Further, we look into how the diverse society is represented, from the use of "alien workers", via "immigrants", to just "diversity". We argue that the concepts or strategies of politics of recognition and politics of integration respectively can be used to describe the curricula. Norway's educational policy towards minorities and indigenous people seems to exist between these two. In the end, this leave diversity competence as an important concept in the future Norwegian school.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hate speech in intercultural encounters Hate Speech in Online Polylogues An Analysis of Hate Speech among Armenian Facebook Users From Euphemism to Verbal Aggression in British and Armenian Cultures Chocolate, identity, and extreme speech online
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1