颈动脉体肿瘤在高容量中心的当代治疗。

D. Mascia, G. Esposito, A. Ferrante, A. Grandi, G. Melissano, R. Chiesa
{"title":"颈动脉体肿瘤在高容量中心的当代治疗。","authors":"D. Mascia, G. Esposito, A. Ferrante, A. Grandi, G. Melissano, R. Chiesa","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10496-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe aim of this study is to report our results with carotid body tumour (CBT) surgical management.\n\n\nMETHODS\nBetween 2010 and 2018, 100 CBTs (mean age: 48.0 years, range 21-80 years old) were treated in our centre. The patients were classified in 3 groups according to the size: group I (< 3cm), group II (3 to 5 cm) and group III (>5 cm).\n\n\nRESULTS\nSurgical resection was performed in 88 patients and conservative treatment in 2 cases. Nine patients were treated for bilateral involvement and one of them was also treated again for a relapse. Postoperatively, cranial nerve injury (CNI) was significantly higher in group II [3 (8.3%) vs 16 (31.4%) vs 2 (15.4%); p = 0.030] with no statistical differences between the CN involved. At univariate analysis for CNI, CBT group (p=0.030), maximum diameter (p=0.046), patients presenting with dysphonia (p=0.035) and dysphagia (p=0.007) and patients suffering from any intraoperative complication (p=0.047) were statistically significant. At multivariate analysis the only significant variable was CBT group II (p=0.016). For blood loss, CBT group III (p<0.001), Shamblin class III (p<0.001), Pulmonary disease (p=0.034) and surgery time (p<0.001) were statistically significant. The follow-up of 79 patients (87.8%) showed a 100% overall survival at median follow-up of 37.7 months (range 2-84.7 months) with freedom from local recurrence of 97.8% (77/79).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nSurgical resection remains the gold standard to obtain complete recovery, although tumour size is to be considered a risk factor for CNI because large CBTs remain at high risk for CNIs.","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotid body tumor contemporary management in a high-volume centre.\",\"authors\":\"D. Mascia, G. Esposito, A. Ferrante, A. Grandi, G. Melissano, R. Chiesa\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10496-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThe aim of this study is to report our results with carotid body tumour (CBT) surgical management.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nBetween 2010 and 2018, 100 CBTs (mean age: 48.0 years, range 21-80 years old) were treated in our centre. The patients were classified in 3 groups according to the size: group I (< 3cm), group II (3 to 5 cm) and group III (>5 cm).\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSurgical resection was performed in 88 patients and conservative treatment in 2 cases. Nine patients were treated for bilateral involvement and one of them was also treated again for a relapse. Postoperatively, cranial nerve injury (CNI) was significantly higher in group II [3 (8.3%) vs 16 (31.4%) vs 2 (15.4%); p = 0.030] with no statistical differences between the CN involved. At univariate analysis for CNI, CBT group (p=0.030), maximum diameter (p=0.046), patients presenting with dysphonia (p=0.035) and dysphagia (p=0.007) and patients suffering from any intraoperative complication (p=0.047) were statistically significant. At multivariate analysis the only significant variable was CBT group II (p=0.016). For blood loss, CBT group III (p<0.001), Shamblin class III (p<0.001), Pulmonary disease (p=0.034) and surgery time (p<0.001) were statistically significant. The follow-up of 79 patients (87.8%) showed a 100% overall survival at median follow-up of 37.7 months (range 2-84.7 months) with freedom from local recurrence of 97.8% (77/79).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nSurgical resection remains the gold standard to obtain complete recovery, although tumour size is to be considered a risk factor for CNI because large CBTs remain at high risk for CNIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10496-X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.19.10496-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是报告颈动脉体肿瘤(CBT)手术治疗的结果。方法2010年至2018年,本中心共收治100例cbt患者,平均年龄48.0岁,年龄21 ~ 80岁。根据患者大小分为3组:I组(< 3cm)、II组(3 ~ 5cm)和III组(> 5cm)。结果手术切除88例,保守治疗2例。9例患者因双侧受累而接受治疗,其中1例因复发再次接受治疗。术后,II组脑神经损伤(CNI)发生率明显高于对照组[3 (8.3%)vs 16 (31.4%) vs 2 (15.4%);p = 0.030],两组间无统计学差异。在CNI的单因素分析中,CBT组(p=0.030)、最大直径(p=0.046)、出现发音障碍(p=0.035)和吞咽困难(p=0.007)以及出现任何术中并发症(p=0.047)的患者具有统计学意义。在多变量分析中,唯一有意义的变量是CBT组II (p=0.016)。在失血量方面,CBT组III (p<0.001)、Shamblin组III (p<0.001)、肺部疾病(p=0.034)和手术时间(p<0.001)差异均有统计学意义。79例患者(87.8%)的随访显示,中位随访37.7个月(2-84.7个月),总生存率为100%,97.8%(77/79)无局部复发。结论手术切除仍然是获得完全康复的金标准,尽管肿瘤大小被认为是CNI的一个危险因素,因为大的cbt仍然是CNI的高风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carotid body tumor contemporary management in a high-volume centre.
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to report our results with carotid body tumour (CBT) surgical management. METHODS Between 2010 and 2018, 100 CBTs (mean age: 48.0 years, range 21-80 years old) were treated in our centre. The patients were classified in 3 groups according to the size: group I (< 3cm), group II (3 to 5 cm) and group III (>5 cm). RESULTS Surgical resection was performed in 88 patients and conservative treatment in 2 cases. Nine patients were treated for bilateral involvement and one of them was also treated again for a relapse. Postoperatively, cranial nerve injury (CNI) was significantly higher in group II [3 (8.3%) vs 16 (31.4%) vs 2 (15.4%); p = 0.030] with no statistical differences between the CN involved. At univariate analysis for CNI, CBT group (p=0.030), maximum diameter (p=0.046), patients presenting with dysphonia (p=0.035) and dysphagia (p=0.007) and patients suffering from any intraoperative complication (p=0.047) were statistically significant. At multivariate analysis the only significant variable was CBT group II (p=0.016). For blood loss, CBT group III (p<0.001), Shamblin class III (p<0.001), Pulmonary disease (p=0.034) and surgery time (p<0.001) were statistically significant. The follow-up of 79 patients (87.8%) showed a 100% overall survival at median follow-up of 37.7 months (range 2-84.7 months) with freedom from local recurrence of 97.8% (77/79). CONCLUSIONS Surgical resection remains the gold standard to obtain complete recovery, although tumour size is to be considered a risk factor for CNI because large CBTs remain at high risk for CNIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tabular review of contemporary fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair experiences for treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Efficacy of Sternum Guard vs. bone wax in post-cardiac surgery patients: a randomized controlled trial. Performance of a new generation balloon expandable stent-graft (Gore VBX) as bridging stent for B-EVAR. Moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation in ischemic heart disease: to operate or not? A meta-analysis. A national cross-sectional survey on time-trends for endovascular repair of genetically-triggered aortic disease and connective tissue disorders over two decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1