{"title":"霍恩矿:地质、历史、对成因模型的影响,以及与基德溪矿的比较","authors":"H. Gibson, D. Kerr, S. Cattalani","doi":"10.2113/0090091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Horne mine was truly a world class Cu and Au deposit. Between 1927 and 1989, it produced some 260 t of Au and 1.13 Mt of Cu from 53.7 Mt of ore that averaged 2.22% Cu, 6.1 g/t Au and 13 g/t Ag. The total value of Au and Cu production from the Horne deposit at metal prices of US$300/oz Au and US$1.00/lb Cu is an outstanding US$5.2 billion. The Horne mine was also a company builder. After optioning the property from Ed Horne (Tremoy Syndicate) in 1922, the Thomson-Chadbourne Syndicate discovered the deposit in 1923 and quickly grew to become Noranda, one of the world’s premier mining companies. This discovery fuelled exploration and, along with subsequent discoveries in the Val d’Or-Cadillac camps, led to the “economic development” of northwestern Quebec. The Horne deposit influenced and continues to influence genetic models for volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits. Early observations at Horne contributed to an epigenetic replacement theory for VMS deposits. The most recent genetic model for the Horne, invoking sub-seafloor sulfide replacement of silicified and sericitized volcaniclastic host rocks within a graben, has subsequently been proposed for another giant VMS deposit, the Kidd Creek mine. The Horne and Kidd Creek deposits show many similarities, such as localization within synvolcanic grabens, long-lived hydrothermal activity uninterrupted by volcanism, sub-seafloor replacement sulfides, stacked sulfide lenses, zone refining, silicified footwall rocks characterized by high positive δ18O values, and association with FIII rhyolites. Notable differences between the two deposits include the lack of andesitic, basaltic or komatiitic flows at Horne, different inferred water depths, high Au content at Horne versus negligible Au, but sub-economic to economic concentrations of Sn, In and Cd at Kidd Creek.","PeriodicalId":206160,"journal":{"name":"Exploration and Mining Geology","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Horne Mine: Geology, History, Influence on Genetic Models, and a Comparison to the Kidd Creek Mine\",\"authors\":\"H. Gibson, D. Kerr, S. Cattalani\",\"doi\":\"10.2113/0090091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Horne mine was truly a world class Cu and Au deposit. Between 1927 and 1989, it produced some 260 t of Au and 1.13 Mt of Cu from 53.7 Mt of ore that averaged 2.22% Cu, 6.1 g/t Au and 13 g/t Ag. The total value of Au and Cu production from the Horne deposit at metal prices of US$300/oz Au and US$1.00/lb Cu is an outstanding US$5.2 billion. The Horne mine was also a company builder. After optioning the property from Ed Horne (Tremoy Syndicate) in 1922, the Thomson-Chadbourne Syndicate discovered the deposit in 1923 and quickly grew to become Noranda, one of the world’s premier mining companies. This discovery fuelled exploration and, along with subsequent discoveries in the Val d’Or-Cadillac camps, led to the “economic development” of northwestern Quebec. The Horne deposit influenced and continues to influence genetic models for volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits. Early observations at Horne contributed to an epigenetic replacement theory for VMS deposits. The most recent genetic model for the Horne, invoking sub-seafloor sulfide replacement of silicified and sericitized volcaniclastic host rocks within a graben, has subsequently been proposed for another giant VMS deposit, the Kidd Creek mine. The Horne and Kidd Creek deposits show many similarities, such as localization within synvolcanic grabens, long-lived hydrothermal activity uninterrupted by volcanism, sub-seafloor replacement sulfides, stacked sulfide lenses, zone refining, silicified footwall rocks characterized by high positive δ18O values, and association with FIII rhyolites. Notable differences between the two deposits include the lack of andesitic, basaltic or komatiitic flows at Horne, different inferred water depths, high Au content at Horne versus negligible Au, but sub-economic to economic concentrations of Sn, In and Cd at Kidd Creek.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exploration and Mining Geology\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exploration and Mining Geology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2113/0090091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration and Mining Geology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/0090091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
摘要
霍恩矿确实是一个世界级的铜金矿。1927年至1989年间,该公司从5370万吨矿石中生产了约260吨金和113万吨铜,平均铜含量为2.22%,金含量为6.1克/吨,银含量为13克/吨。在金属价格为300美元/盎司金和1.00美元/磅铜的情况下,Horne矿床的金和铜生产总价值为52亿美元。霍恩矿也是一家公司的建设者。1922年,汤姆森-查德本辛迪加公司从埃德·霍恩(特雷莫伊辛迪加公司)手中买下了这块土地,1923年,汤姆森-查德本辛迪加公司发现了这块矿藏,并迅速成长为诺兰达公司,成为世界上首屈一指的矿业公司之一。这一发现推动了勘探,并与随后在Val d 'Or-Cadillac营地的发现一起,导致了魁北克西北部的“经济发展”。霍恩矿床影响并将继续影响火山成因块状硫化物矿床的成因模式。霍恩的早期观察为VMS沉积的表观遗传替代理论做出了贡献。Horne的最新成因模型,援引了地堑内硅化和绢云母化火山碎屑宿主岩的海底硫化物替代作用,随后又提出了另一个大型VMS矿床,Kidd Creek矿。Horne和Kidd Creek矿床具有同火山地堑内定位、不受火山作用影响的长寿命热液活动、海底替代硫化物、叠合硫化物透镜体、带细化、具有高正δ18O值的硅化下盘岩石以及与FIII流纹岩相关联等特点。两个矿床之间的显著差异包括Horne缺乏安山岩、玄武岩或马马岩流,推断水深不同,Horne的Au含量高,而Kidd Creek的Au含量可忽略不计,而Sn、In和Cd的浓度则低于经济水平。
The Horne Mine: Geology, History, Influence on Genetic Models, and a Comparison to the Kidd Creek Mine
The Horne mine was truly a world class Cu and Au deposit. Between 1927 and 1989, it produced some 260 t of Au and 1.13 Mt of Cu from 53.7 Mt of ore that averaged 2.22% Cu, 6.1 g/t Au and 13 g/t Ag. The total value of Au and Cu production from the Horne deposit at metal prices of US$300/oz Au and US$1.00/lb Cu is an outstanding US$5.2 billion. The Horne mine was also a company builder. After optioning the property from Ed Horne (Tremoy Syndicate) in 1922, the Thomson-Chadbourne Syndicate discovered the deposit in 1923 and quickly grew to become Noranda, one of the world’s premier mining companies. This discovery fuelled exploration and, along with subsequent discoveries in the Val d’Or-Cadillac camps, led to the “economic development” of northwestern Quebec. The Horne deposit influenced and continues to influence genetic models for volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) deposits. Early observations at Horne contributed to an epigenetic replacement theory for VMS deposits. The most recent genetic model for the Horne, invoking sub-seafloor sulfide replacement of silicified and sericitized volcaniclastic host rocks within a graben, has subsequently been proposed for another giant VMS deposit, the Kidd Creek mine. The Horne and Kidd Creek deposits show many similarities, such as localization within synvolcanic grabens, long-lived hydrothermal activity uninterrupted by volcanism, sub-seafloor replacement sulfides, stacked sulfide lenses, zone refining, silicified footwall rocks characterized by high positive δ18O values, and association with FIII rhyolites. Notable differences between the two deposits include the lack of andesitic, basaltic or komatiitic flows at Horne, different inferred water depths, high Au content at Horne versus negligible Au, but sub-economic to economic concentrations of Sn, In and Cd at Kidd Creek.