德国的电气化和煤炭淘汰:情景分析

Felix Boing, A. Murmann, Andrej Guminski
{"title":"德国的电气化和煤炭淘汰:情景分析","authors":"Felix Boing, A. Murmann, Andrej Guminski","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2018.8469771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electrification of fossil fueled processes and applications is frequently quoted as an essential component for the deep decarbonization of the German energy system. A prerequisite for decarbonization through electrification is low-emission electricity. In the German case, this leads to the so-called “electrification dilemma”, as both a reduction of the emission-intensive conventional power plant park and the significant increase in electricity consumption are driving the demand for RES and guaranteed capacities drastically. In a simulation-based scenario analysis, two measures to reduce emissions in power generation in a high electrification regime are compared: CO2-allowance pricing and a lignite phase-out. Using the DC power flow formulation, the effects on the German transmission grid are determined. The results show that both the coal phase-out and an increase in the CO2-prices lead to a significant reduction in the average CO2-coefficient of power generation. Simultaneously the capacity gap increases significantly, but only for a few hours per year.","PeriodicalId":334674,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Electrification and Coal Phase-Out in Germany: A Scenario Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Felix Boing, A. Murmann, Andrej Guminski\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2018.8469771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The electrification of fossil fueled processes and applications is frequently quoted as an essential component for the deep decarbonization of the German energy system. A prerequisite for decarbonization through electrification is low-emission electricity. In the German case, this leads to the so-called “electrification dilemma”, as both a reduction of the emission-intensive conventional power plant park and the significant increase in electricity consumption are driving the demand for RES and guaranteed capacities drastically. In a simulation-based scenario analysis, two measures to reduce emissions in power generation in a high electrification regime are compared: CO2-allowance pricing and a lignite phase-out. Using the DC power flow formulation, the effects on the German transmission grid are determined. The results show that both the coal phase-out and an increase in the CO2-prices lead to a significant reduction in the average CO2-coefficient of power generation. Simultaneously the capacity gap increases significantly, but only for a few hours per year.\",\"PeriodicalId\":334674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2018.8469771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2018.8469771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

化石燃料过程和应用的电气化经常被引用为德国能源系统深度脱碳的重要组成部分。通过电气化实现脱碳的先决条件是低排放电力。在德国的情况下,这导致了所谓的“电气化困境”,因为排放密集型传统发电厂园区的减少和电力消耗的显著增加正在大幅推动对可再生能源和保证容量的需求。在基于模拟的情景分析中,比较了在高电气化制度下减少发电排放的两种措施:二氧化碳配额定价和褐煤淘汰。利用直流潮流公式,确定了对德国输电网的影响。研究结果表明,煤炭淘汰和二氧化碳价格上涨均导致发电平均二氧化碳系数显著降低。与此同时,容量差距显著增加,但每年只增加几个小时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Electrification and Coal Phase-Out in Germany: A Scenario Analysis
The electrification of fossil fueled processes and applications is frequently quoted as an essential component for the deep decarbonization of the German energy system. A prerequisite for decarbonization through electrification is low-emission electricity. In the German case, this leads to the so-called “electrification dilemma”, as both a reduction of the emission-intensive conventional power plant park and the significant increase in electricity consumption are driving the demand for RES and guaranteed capacities drastically. In a simulation-based scenario analysis, two measures to reduce emissions in power generation in a high electrification regime are compared: CO2-allowance pricing and a lignite phase-out. Using the DC power flow formulation, the effects on the German transmission grid are determined. The results show that both the coal phase-out and an increase in the CO2-prices lead to a significant reduction in the average CO2-coefficient of power generation. Simultaneously the capacity gap increases significantly, but only for a few hours per year.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fast Frequency Control Services in Europe Development of the Polish Power Exchange as a Management System in Terms of Control Theory and Systems Engineering Are Consumption Tariffs Still Up-to-Date? an Operationalized Assessment of Grid Fees Enhancing N -1 Security via Building Thermostatic Load Control Strategy Improvement of DC Microgrid Voltage Regulation Based on Bidirectional Intelligent Charging Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1