工程设计中的反思性实践

W. Dias, D. Blockley
{"title":"工程设计中的反思性实践","authors":"W. Dias, D. Blockley","doi":"10.1680/ICIEN.1995.28038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civil engineers ar valued by society for their knowledge and skills which, though based on theory, are forged through experience. Indeed, the real world is a messy place of complex, interacting systems which time and time again demonstrate the inadequacies of engineering theory. The scientific approach to engineering education does not equip graduates effectively for professional practice. This paper introduces the concept of 'reflective practice', explains how it can be formalized and suggests that it should be adopted alongside the traditional technical rationality approach to teaching engineering design. It involves analysing past failures, using artificial intelligence and, above all, looking at the big picture.","PeriodicalId":340765,"journal":{"name":"Building Bridges","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflective Practice in Engineering Design\",\"authors\":\"W. Dias, D. Blockley\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/ICIEN.1995.28038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Civil engineers ar valued by society for their knowledge and skills which, though based on theory, are forged through experience. Indeed, the real world is a messy place of complex, interacting systems which time and time again demonstrate the inadequacies of engineering theory. The scientific approach to engineering education does not equip graduates effectively for professional practice. This paper introduces the concept of 'reflective practice', explains how it can be formalized and suggests that it should be adopted alongside the traditional technical rationality approach to teaching engineering design. It involves analysing past failures, using artificial intelligence and, above all, looking at the big picture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building Bridges\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building Bridges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/ICIEN.1995.28038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Bridges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/ICIEN.1995.28038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

土木工程师的知识和技能受到社会的重视,这些知识和技能虽然是建立在理论基础上的,但却是通过经验锤炼出来的。事实上,现实世界是一个混乱的地方,复杂的,相互作用的系统一次又一次地证明了工程理论的不足。科学的工程教育方法不能有效地使毕业生具备专业实践能力。本文介绍了“反思性实践”的概念,解释了如何将其形式化,并建议在工程设计教学中应与传统的技术理性方法一起采用。它包括分析过去的失败,使用人工智能,最重要的是,着眼于大局。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reflective Practice in Engineering Design
Civil engineers ar valued by society for their knowledge and skills which, though based on theory, are forged through experience. Indeed, the real world is a messy place of complex, interacting systems which time and time again demonstrate the inadequacies of engineering theory. The scientific approach to engineering education does not equip graduates effectively for professional practice. This paper introduces the concept of 'reflective practice', explains how it can be formalized and suggests that it should be adopted alongside the traditional technical rationality approach to teaching engineering design. It involves analysing past failures, using artificial intelligence and, above all, looking at the big picture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epilogue: “The scent of a spring day” Multiplicity, paradox, and the creative self Facing the nonnegotiable “I wish you were my father!” The capacity to tolerate paradox
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1