人工智能与民主的过去、现在和未来

Mathias Risse
{"title":"人工智能与民主的过去、现在和未来","authors":"Mathias Risse","doi":"10.1017/9781009207898.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Langdon Winner’s classic essay ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’ resists a widespread but naïve view of the role of technology in human life: that technology is neutral, and all depends on use. He does so without enlisting an overbearing determinism that makes technology the sole engine of change. Instead, Winner distinguishes two ways for artefacts to have ‘political qualities’. First, devices or systems might be means for establishing patterns of power or authority, but the design is flexible: such patterns can turn out one way or another. An example is traffic infrastructure, which can assist many people but also keep parts of the population in subordination, say, if they cannot reach suitable workplaces. Secondly, devices or systems are strongly, perhaps unavoidably, tied to certain patterns of power. Winner’s example is atomic energy, which requires industrial, scientific, and military elites to provide and protect energy sources. Artificial Intelligence (AI), I argue, is political the way traffic infrastructure is: It can greatly strengthen democracy, but only with the right efforts. Understanding ‘the politics of AI’ is crucial since Xi Jinping’s China loudly champions one-party rule as a better fit for our digital century. AI is a key component in the contest between authoritarian and democratic rule. Unlike conventional programs, AI algorithms learn by themselves. Programmers provide data, which a set of methods, known as machine learning, analyze for trends and inferences. Owing to their sophistication and sweeping applications, these technologies are poised to dramatically alter our world. Specialized AI is already broadly deployed. At the high end, one may think of AI mastering Chess or Go. More commonly we encounter it in smartphones (Siri, Google Translate, curated newsfeeds), home devices (Alexa, Google Home, Nest), personalized customer services, or GPS systems. Specialized AI is used by law enforcement, the military, in browser searching, advertising and entertainment (e.g., recommender systems), medical diagnostics, logistics, finance (from assessing credit to flagging transactions), in speech recognition producing transcripts, trade bots using market data for predictions, but also in music creations and article drafting (e.g., GPT-3’s text generator writing posts or code). Governments track people using AI in facial, voice, or gait recognition. Smart cities analyze traffic data in real time or design services. COVID-19 accelerated use of AI in drug discovery. Natural language","PeriodicalId":306343,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence and the Past, Present, and Future of Democracy\",\"authors\":\"Mathias Risse\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781009207898.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Langdon Winner’s classic essay ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’ resists a widespread but naïve view of the role of technology in human life: that technology is neutral, and all depends on use. He does so without enlisting an overbearing determinism that makes technology the sole engine of change. Instead, Winner distinguishes two ways for artefacts to have ‘political qualities’. First, devices or systems might be means for establishing patterns of power or authority, but the design is flexible: such patterns can turn out one way or another. An example is traffic infrastructure, which can assist many people but also keep parts of the population in subordination, say, if they cannot reach suitable workplaces. Secondly, devices or systems are strongly, perhaps unavoidably, tied to certain patterns of power. Winner’s example is atomic energy, which requires industrial, scientific, and military elites to provide and protect energy sources. Artificial Intelligence (AI), I argue, is political the way traffic infrastructure is: It can greatly strengthen democracy, but only with the right efforts. Understanding ‘the politics of AI’ is crucial since Xi Jinping’s China loudly champions one-party rule as a better fit for our digital century. AI is a key component in the contest between authoritarian and democratic rule. Unlike conventional programs, AI algorithms learn by themselves. Programmers provide data, which a set of methods, known as machine learning, analyze for trends and inferences. Owing to their sophistication and sweeping applications, these technologies are poised to dramatically alter our world. Specialized AI is already broadly deployed. At the high end, one may think of AI mastering Chess or Go. More commonly we encounter it in smartphones (Siri, Google Translate, curated newsfeeds), home devices (Alexa, Google Home, Nest), personalized customer services, or GPS systems. Specialized AI is used by law enforcement, the military, in browser searching, advertising and entertainment (e.g., recommender systems), medical diagnostics, logistics, finance (from assessing credit to flagging transactions), in speech recognition producing transcripts, trade bots using market data for predictions, but also in music creations and article drafting (e.g., GPT-3’s text generator writing posts or code). Governments track people using AI in facial, voice, or gait recognition. Smart cities analyze traffic data in real time or design services. COVID-19 accelerated use of AI in drug discovery. Natural language\",\"PeriodicalId\":306343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207898.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Handbook of Responsible Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009207898.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

兰登·温纳的经典文章《文物有政治吗?》反对一种普遍但naïve的观点,即技术在人类生活中的作用:技术是中立的,一切都取决于使用。他这样做,并没有诉诸专横的决定论,认为技术是变革的唯一引擎。相反,温纳区分了人工制品具有“政治品质”的两种方式。首先,设备或系统可能是建立权力或权威模式的手段,但设计是灵活的:这种模式可以以一种方式或另一种方式出现。交通基础设施就是一个例子,它可以帮助许多人,但也会让一部分人处于从属地位,比如,如果他们无法到达合适的工作场所。其次,设备或系统与某些权力模式紧密相连,或许是不可避免的。赢家的例子是原子能,它需要工业,科学和军事精英提供和保护能源。我认为,人工智能(AI)就像交通基础设施一样具有政治意义:它可以极大地加强民主,但前提是要付出正确的努力。人工智能是威权统治和民主统治之间竞争的关键组成部分。与传统程序不同,人工智能算法可以自己学习。程序员提供数据,然后用一套被称为机器学习的方法来分析趋势和推断。由于这些技术的复杂性和广泛的应用,它们将极大地改变我们的世界。专门的人工智能已经得到了广泛的应用。在高端,人们可能会想到AI掌握国际象棋或围棋。更常见的是,我们在智能手机(Siri、谷歌翻译、精选新闻提要)、家庭设备(Alexa、谷歌家庭、Nest)、个性化客户服务或GPS系统中遇到它。专门的人工智能被用于执法、军事、浏览器搜索、广告和娱乐(例如,推荐系统)、医疗诊断、物流、金融(从评估信用到标记交易)、语音识别生成成绩单、使用市场数据进行预测的交易机器人,以及音乐创作和文章起草(例如,GPT-3的文本生成器编写帖子或代码)。政府通过面部、语音或步态识别跟踪使用人工智能的人。智能城市实时分析交通数据或设计服务。COVID-19加速了人工智能在药物研发中的应用。自然语言
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Artificial Intelligence and the Past, Present, and Future of Democracy
Langdon Winner’s classic essay ‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’ resists a widespread but naïve view of the role of technology in human life: that technology is neutral, and all depends on use. He does so without enlisting an overbearing determinism that makes technology the sole engine of change. Instead, Winner distinguishes two ways for artefacts to have ‘political qualities’. First, devices or systems might be means for establishing patterns of power or authority, but the design is flexible: such patterns can turn out one way or another. An example is traffic infrastructure, which can assist many people but also keep parts of the population in subordination, say, if they cannot reach suitable workplaces. Secondly, devices or systems are strongly, perhaps unavoidably, tied to certain patterns of power. Winner’s example is atomic energy, which requires industrial, scientific, and military elites to provide and protect energy sources. Artificial Intelligence (AI), I argue, is political the way traffic infrastructure is: It can greatly strengthen democracy, but only with the right efforts. Understanding ‘the politics of AI’ is crucial since Xi Jinping’s China loudly champions one-party rule as a better fit for our digital century. AI is a key component in the contest between authoritarian and democratic rule. Unlike conventional programs, AI algorithms learn by themselves. Programmers provide data, which a set of methods, known as machine learning, analyze for trends and inferences. Owing to their sophistication and sweeping applications, these technologies are poised to dramatically alter our world. Specialized AI is already broadly deployed. At the high end, one may think of AI mastering Chess or Go. More commonly we encounter it in smartphones (Siri, Google Translate, curated newsfeeds), home devices (Alexa, Google Home, Nest), personalized customer services, or GPS systems. Specialized AI is used by law enforcement, the military, in browser searching, advertising and entertainment (e.g., recommender systems), medical diagnostics, logistics, finance (from assessing credit to flagging transactions), in speech recognition producing transcripts, trade bots using market data for predictions, but also in music creations and article drafting (e.g., GPT-3’s text generator writing posts or code). Governments track people using AI in facial, voice, or gait recognition. Smart cities analyze traffic data in real time or design services. COVID-19 accelerated use of AI in drug discovery. Natural language
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial Intelligence and the Right to Data Protection Medical AI: Key Elements at the International Level Liability for Artificial Intelligence: The Need to Address Both Safety Risks and Fundamental Rights Risks Morally Repugnant Weaponry?: Ethical Responses to the Prospect of Autonomous Weapons "Hey Siri, How Am I Doing?": Legal Challenges for Artificial Intelligence Alter Egos in Healthcare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1