1和3mg格拉司琼预防斜视术后全身麻醉下恶心呕吐的比较研究

T. Khair, M. Ahmed, A. Mohamed, I. Sayed, Tamer Saafan
{"title":"1和3mg格拉司琼预防斜视术后全身麻醉下恶心呕吐的比较研究","authors":"T. Khair, M. Ahmed, A. Mohamed, I. Sayed, Tamer Saafan","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_8_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims To compare the safety and efficacy of 1 and 3 mg of granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in strabismus surgeries under general anesthesia. Settings and design This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at the ophthalmology operating theater of Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals. Patients and methods We recruited 210 patients and allocated them randomly to receive either granisetron 1 mg (n=105) or 3 mg (n=105). The two groups were compared regarding demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, and percentage of patients with no complaints of PONV during the first 24 h. Results There was no statistically significant difference upon comparison of the two groups regarding PONV (P>0.05). The two doses (1 and 3 mg) provided total control of nausea and vomiting in 46.7 and 43.8% of patients during the first 24 h postoperatively, respectively. Moreover, we found no significant difference between the two groups regarding mean values of the heart rate or mean arterial pressure both preoperatively and intraoperatively (P>0.05). However, during the postoperative 24 h, both groups had significant differences regarding mean values of heart rate and mean arterial pressure at 2–4 h, 8–12 h, and 12–24 h postoperatively. Conclusions The comparison between two doses of granisetron (1 and 3 mg) showed no statistical difference regarding the total control of nausea and vomiting for 24 h postoperatively but showed a statistical difference regarding some postoperative vital sign readings.","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study between 1 and 3 mg of granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in strabismus ophthalmic surgeries during general anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"T. Khair, M. Ahmed, A. Mohamed, I. Sayed, Tamer Saafan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/roaic.roaic_8_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims To compare the safety and efficacy of 1 and 3 mg of granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in strabismus surgeries under general anesthesia. Settings and design This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at the ophthalmology operating theater of Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals. Patients and methods We recruited 210 patients and allocated them randomly to receive either granisetron 1 mg (n=105) or 3 mg (n=105). The two groups were compared regarding demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, and percentage of patients with no complaints of PONV during the first 24 h. Results There was no statistically significant difference upon comparison of the two groups regarding PONV (P>0.05). The two doses (1 and 3 mg) provided total control of nausea and vomiting in 46.7 and 43.8% of patients during the first 24 h postoperatively, respectively. Moreover, we found no significant difference between the two groups regarding mean values of the heart rate or mean arterial pressure both preoperatively and intraoperatively (P>0.05). However, during the postoperative 24 h, both groups had significant differences regarding mean values of heart rate and mean arterial pressure at 2–4 h, 8–12 h, and 12–24 h postoperatively. Conclusions The comparison between two doses of granisetron (1 and 3 mg) showed no statistical difference regarding the total control of nausea and vomiting for 24 h postoperatively but showed a statistical difference regarding some postoperative vital sign readings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_8_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_8_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较1、3mg格拉司琼预防斜视手术全麻下术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的安全性和有效性。本单盲、随机、对照试验在Kasr Al-Ainy医院眼科手术室进行。患者和方法我们招募了210例患者,并将他们随机分配到格拉司琼1mg (n=105)或3mg (n=105)组。比较两组患者的人口学数据、血流动力学参数和前24小时无PONV主诉的患者百分比。结果两组PONV比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两种剂量(1和3mg)在术后24小时内分别为46.7%和43.8%的患者提供恶心和呕吐的完全控制。两组患者术前、术中心率平均值、平均动脉压均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。然而,在术后24小时内,两组在术后2-4小时、8-12小时和12-24小时的心率和平均动脉压平均值有显著差异。结论格拉司琼1和3mg两种剂量对术后24 h恶心呕吐的总控制无统计学差异,但在术后一些生命体征指标上有统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study between 1 and 3 mg of granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in strabismus ophthalmic surgeries during general anesthesia
Aims To compare the safety and efficacy of 1 and 3 mg of granisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in strabismus surgeries under general anesthesia. Settings and design This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at the ophthalmology operating theater of Kasr Al-Ainy Hospitals. Patients and methods We recruited 210 patients and allocated them randomly to receive either granisetron 1 mg (n=105) or 3 mg (n=105). The two groups were compared regarding demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, and percentage of patients with no complaints of PONV during the first 24 h. Results There was no statistically significant difference upon comparison of the two groups regarding PONV (P>0.05). The two doses (1 and 3 mg) provided total control of nausea and vomiting in 46.7 and 43.8% of patients during the first 24 h postoperatively, respectively. Moreover, we found no significant difference between the two groups regarding mean values of the heart rate or mean arterial pressure both preoperatively and intraoperatively (P>0.05). However, during the postoperative 24 h, both groups had significant differences regarding mean values of heart rate and mean arterial pressure at 2–4 h, 8–12 h, and 12–24 h postoperatively. Conclusions The comparison between two doses of granisetron (1 and 3 mg) showed no statistical difference regarding the total control of nausea and vomiting for 24 h postoperatively but showed a statistical difference regarding some postoperative vital sign readings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1