游戏vs银行

Dominic Cortis, Luke Spiteri
{"title":"游戏vs银行","authors":"Dominic Cortis, Luke Spiteri","doi":"10.5750/jgbe.v14i1.1938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work compares existing and emerging risks of the banking and iGaming industries. Moreover, whilst a solvency framework is established in the banking industry, this study researches the potential implementation of a solvency regime in the iGaming industry. \nOur literature review is complemented with semi-structured interviews held with 23 stakeholders working in risk management in Malta. \nThe common risks identified were compliance with regulations, money laundering, liquidity and solvency risks. The banking industry highlighted credit, market and jurisdiction risks as specific risks faced by their industry – the latter being potential worry specific to the Maltese jurisdiction. iGaming experts highlighted financial, responsible gaming and market changes as specific risks for their industry. A formalised solvency framework would be beneficial to the iGaming industry by further enhancing its reputation. Finally, we find that more focus should be given to risk management in banks and iGaming operators to improve the relationship between both industries.","PeriodicalId":109210,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iGaming versus Banking\",\"authors\":\"Dominic Cortis, Luke Spiteri\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/jgbe.v14i1.1938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work compares existing and emerging risks of the banking and iGaming industries. Moreover, whilst a solvency framework is established in the banking industry, this study researches the potential implementation of a solvency regime in the iGaming industry. \\nOur literature review is complemented with semi-structured interviews held with 23 stakeholders working in risk management in Malta. \\nThe common risks identified were compliance with regulations, money laundering, liquidity and solvency risks. The banking industry highlighted credit, market and jurisdiction risks as specific risks faced by their industry – the latter being potential worry specific to the Maltese jurisdiction. iGaming experts highlighted financial, responsible gaming and market changes as specific risks for their industry. A formalised solvency framework would be beneficial to the iGaming industry by further enhancing its reputation. Finally, we find that more focus should be given to risk management in banks and iGaming operators to improve the relationship between both industries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v14i1.1938\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v14i1.1938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作比较了银行和游戏行业现有的和新出现的风险。此外,在银行业建立偿付能力框架的同时,本研究还研究了在游戏行业实施偿付能力制度的可能性。我们的文献综述辅以与23位在马耳他从事风险管理工作的利益相关者进行的半结构化访谈。确定的共同风险是遵守法规、洗钱、流动性和偿付能力风险。银行业强调信贷、市场和司法风险是其行业面临的具体风险,后者是马耳他司法管辖区特有的潜在担忧。电子游戏专家强调,金融、负责任的游戏和市场变化是该行业面临的具体风险。一个正式的偿付能力框架将进一步提高游戏行业的声誉,从而有利于游戏行业。最后,我们发现银行和网游运营商的风险管理应该得到更多的关注,以改善两者之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
iGaming versus Banking
This work compares existing and emerging risks of the banking and iGaming industries. Moreover, whilst a solvency framework is established in the banking industry, this study researches the potential implementation of a solvency regime in the iGaming industry. Our literature review is complemented with semi-structured interviews held with 23 stakeholders working in risk management in Malta. The common risks identified were compliance with regulations, money laundering, liquidity and solvency risks. The banking industry highlighted credit, market and jurisdiction risks as specific risks faced by their industry – the latter being potential worry specific to the Maltese jurisdiction. iGaming experts highlighted financial, responsible gaming and market changes as specific risks for their industry. A formalised solvency framework would be beneficial to the iGaming industry by further enhancing its reputation. Finally, we find that more focus should be given to risk management in banks and iGaming operators to improve the relationship between both industries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bayesian Assessment of Casino Promotions Sales Volume, Noise Traders, and Efficiency of the Japanese Racetrack Betting Market Power Imbalances, Market Concentration, and High Jackpots: The Case of EuroMillions Betting Market-Based Expectations and NFL Coach Retention and Dismissal The Roaring 2020s: Changing Priorities of Casino Customers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1