使用故障注入来评估软件工程标准

J. Voas, K. Miller
{"title":"使用故障注入来评估软件工程标准","authors":"J. Voas, K. Miller","doi":"10.1109/SESS.1995.525959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Standards for quality software are increasingly important, especially for critical systems. Development standards and practices must be subjected to quantitative analyses; it is no longer adequate to encourage practices because they \"make sense\" or \"seem reasonable.\" Process improvement must be demonstrated by a history of improved products. Fault-injection methods can be used to assess the quality of software itself and to demonstrate the effectiveness of software processes. Fault-injection techniques can help developers move beyond the practical limitations of testing. Fault-injection techniques focus on software behavior, not structure; process-oriented techniques cannot measure behavior as precisely. Fault-injection methods are dynamic, empirical, and tractable; as such, they belie the notion that measuring the reliability of critical software is futile. Before focusing too narrowly on the assessment of software development processes, we should further explore the measurement of software behaviors.","PeriodicalId":178570,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Software Engineering Standards Symposium","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using fault injection to assess software engineering standards\",\"authors\":\"J. Voas, K. Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SESS.1995.525959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Standards for quality software are increasingly important, especially for critical systems. Development standards and practices must be subjected to quantitative analyses; it is no longer adequate to encourage practices because they \\\"make sense\\\" or \\\"seem reasonable.\\\" Process improvement must be demonstrated by a history of improved products. Fault-injection methods can be used to assess the quality of software itself and to demonstrate the effectiveness of software processes. Fault-injection techniques can help developers move beyond the practical limitations of testing. Fault-injection techniques focus on software behavior, not structure; process-oriented techniques cannot measure behavior as precisely. Fault-injection methods are dynamic, empirical, and tractable; as such, they belie the notion that measuring the reliability of critical software is futile. Before focusing too narrowly on the assessment of software development processes, we should further explore the measurement of software behaviors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of Software Engineering Standards Symposium\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of Software Engineering Standards Symposium\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SESS.1995.525959\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Software Engineering Standards Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SESS.1995.525959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

质量软件的标准越来越重要,特别是对于关键系统。必须对发展标准和做法进行定量分析;仅仅因为实践“有意义”或“看起来合理”就鼓励它们已经不够了。过程改进必须通过改进产品的历史来证明。故障注入方法可以用来评估软件本身的质量,并证明软件过程的有效性。故障注入技术可以帮助开发人员超越测试的实际限制。故障注入技术关注的是软件行为,而不是结构;面向过程的技术不能精确地度量行为。故障注入方法具有动态性、经验性和易处理性;因此,他们认为衡量关键软件的可靠性是徒劳的。在过于狭隘地关注软件开发过程的评估之前,我们应该进一步探索软件行为的度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Using fault injection to assess software engineering standards
Standards for quality software are increasingly important, especially for critical systems. Development standards and practices must be subjected to quantitative analyses; it is no longer adequate to encourage practices because they "make sense" or "seem reasonable." Process improvement must be demonstrated by a history of improved products. Fault-injection methods can be used to assess the quality of software itself and to demonstrate the effectiveness of software processes. Fault-injection techniques can help developers move beyond the practical limitations of testing. Fault-injection techniques focus on software behavior, not structure; process-oriented techniques cannot measure behavior as precisely. Fault-injection methods are dynamic, empirical, and tractable; as such, they belie the notion that measuring the reliability of critical software is futile. Before focusing too narrowly on the assessment of software development processes, we should further explore the measurement of software behaviors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Formal test specifications in open systems Quality Function Deployment (QFD): an effective technique for requirements acquisition and reuse Ontario Hydro/AECL standards for software engineering deficiencies in existing standards that created their need Issues of software standardization in the industrial area of quality and dependability Safety of computerized I&C systems: projects of IEC standards with emphasis on power plant sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1