托珠单抗与伊托珠单抗在2019冠状病毒感染患者中的比较研究:一项随机对照试验

K. Poonam, Sinha Chandni, K. Amarjeet, K. Ajeet, Arun Shettru K., Kandrakonda Pavan K.
{"title":"托珠单抗与伊托珠单抗在2019冠状病毒感染患者中的比较研究:一项随机对照试验","authors":"K. Poonam, Sinha Chandni, K. Amarjeet, K. Ajeet, Arun Shettru K., Kandrakonda Pavan K.","doi":"10.4103/roaic.roaic_18_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective We aimed to compare the effect of tocilizumab and itolizumab in terms of PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F ratio), interleukin 6 (IL-6) level, serum ferritin, C-reactive protein, and a reduction in mortality. Our primary objective was to compare P/F ratio at various time intervals: baseline (before administering the drug), 12 h after drug administration, once a day for the next 7 days, and on the 14th day. Our secondary objective was to evaluate serum level of biomarkers like IL-6, ferritin, and C-reactive protein before start of drug infusion and following drug infusion at 72 h and on 7th day. Patients and methods A total of 50 patients, age between 18 and 60 years, having moderate Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following coronavirus disease 2019 infection were recruited. Patients of group I received a single dose of injection of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) via infusion over 1–2 h. Group II patients received premedication with hydrocortisone 100 mg and pheniramine 30 mg and a single dose of injection itolizumab 1.6 mg/kg dissolved in 250 ml of 0.9% normal saline infusion over 5–6 h. Results We observed significantly higher P/F ratio in the itolizumab group (239.18±97.31) than in the tocilizumab group (104.87±75.25) on the 3rd day following drug administration (P<0.001). Similarly, the IL-6 level was lower in the itolizumab group (72±100) in comparison with the tocilizumab group (682±1360), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). We identified adverse effects of the drugs in 10 patients who have received itolizumab. Conclusion We observed an increasing trend in P/F ratio on the 3rd day following itolizumab administration in comparison with tocilizumab, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).","PeriodicalId":151256,"journal":{"name":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of tocilizumab versus itolizumab in coronavirus disease 2019-infected patients: a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"K. Poonam, Sinha Chandni, K. Amarjeet, K. Ajeet, Arun Shettru K., Kandrakonda Pavan K.\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/roaic.roaic_18_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective We aimed to compare the effect of tocilizumab and itolizumab in terms of PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F ratio), interleukin 6 (IL-6) level, serum ferritin, C-reactive protein, and a reduction in mortality. Our primary objective was to compare P/F ratio at various time intervals: baseline (before administering the drug), 12 h after drug administration, once a day for the next 7 days, and on the 14th day. Our secondary objective was to evaluate serum level of biomarkers like IL-6, ferritin, and C-reactive protein before start of drug infusion and following drug infusion at 72 h and on 7th day. Patients and methods A total of 50 patients, age between 18 and 60 years, having moderate Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following coronavirus disease 2019 infection were recruited. Patients of group I received a single dose of injection of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) via infusion over 1–2 h. Group II patients received premedication with hydrocortisone 100 mg and pheniramine 30 mg and a single dose of injection itolizumab 1.6 mg/kg dissolved in 250 ml of 0.9% normal saline infusion over 5–6 h. Results We observed significantly higher P/F ratio in the itolizumab group (239.18±97.31) than in the tocilizumab group (104.87±75.25) on the 3rd day following drug administration (P<0.001). Similarly, the IL-6 level was lower in the itolizumab group (72±100) in comparison with the tocilizumab group (682±1360), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). We identified adverse effects of the drugs in 10 patients who have received itolizumab. Conclusion We observed an increasing trend in P/F ratio on the 3rd day following itolizumab administration in comparison with tocilizumab, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).\",\"PeriodicalId\":151256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_18_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Opinion in Anesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/roaic.roaic_18_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目的是比较托珠单抗和伊托珠单抗在PaO2/FiO2比率(P/F比率)、白细胞介素6 (IL-6)水平、血清铁蛋白、c反应蛋白和死亡率降低方面的影响。我们的主要目的是比较不同时间间隔的P/F比率:基线(给药前),给药后12小时,接下来的7天每天一次,第14天。我们的次要目标是在药物输注开始前和输注后72小时和第7天评估血清生物标志物如IL-6、铁蛋白和c反应蛋白的水平。患者和方法招募50例冠状病毒病2019感染后出现中度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的患者,年龄在18 ~ 60岁之间。I组患者给予单剂量tocilizumab 8mg /kg静脉注射(iv),输注1-2小时。II组患者术前给予氢化可的松100 mg、苯那敏30 mg,单次注射依托单抗1.6 mg/kg,溶解于0.9%生理盐水250 ml中,5-6 h。结果给药后第3天,伊托珠单抗组P/F比值(239.18±97.31)显著高于托珠单抗组(104.87±75.25)(P<0.001)。伊托珠单抗组IL-6水平(72±100)低于托珠单抗组(682±1360),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。我们在10例接受itolizumab治疗的患者中发现了药物的不良反应。结论与托珠单抗相比,伊托珠单抗给药后第3天P/F有升高趋势,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of tocilizumab versus itolizumab in coronavirus disease 2019-infected patients: a randomized controlled trial
Objective We aimed to compare the effect of tocilizumab and itolizumab in terms of PaO2/FiO2 ratio (P/F ratio), interleukin 6 (IL-6) level, serum ferritin, C-reactive protein, and a reduction in mortality. Our primary objective was to compare P/F ratio at various time intervals: baseline (before administering the drug), 12 h after drug administration, once a day for the next 7 days, and on the 14th day. Our secondary objective was to evaluate serum level of biomarkers like IL-6, ferritin, and C-reactive protein before start of drug infusion and following drug infusion at 72 h and on 7th day. Patients and methods A total of 50 patients, age between 18 and 60 years, having moderate Acute Respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following coronavirus disease 2019 infection were recruited. Patients of group I received a single dose of injection of tocilizumab 8 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) via infusion over 1–2 h. Group II patients received premedication with hydrocortisone 100 mg and pheniramine 30 mg and a single dose of injection itolizumab 1.6 mg/kg dissolved in 250 ml of 0.9% normal saline infusion over 5–6 h. Results We observed significantly higher P/F ratio in the itolizumab group (239.18±97.31) than in the tocilizumab group (104.87±75.25) on the 3rd day following drug administration (P<0.001). Similarly, the IL-6 level was lower in the itolizumab group (72±100) in comparison with the tocilizumab group (682±1360), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). We identified adverse effects of the drugs in 10 patients who have received itolizumab. Conclusion We observed an increasing trend in P/F ratio on the 3rd day following itolizumab administration in comparison with tocilizumab, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of combined pulsed radiofrequency and steroid injection to the dorsal root ganglion in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia: a prospective randomized clinical trial Sacrococcygeal local anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia for pilonidal sinus surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study Role of enteral metoprolol tartrate on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes of septic shock patients of various pretargeted heart rate groups Prediction of protective lung tidal volume using the ulna length in Egyptian adults Characteristics and clinical outcomes of critically ill pregnant patients with COVID-19 disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1