{"title":"关于渐近零性和多项式微积分证明复杂性","authors":"Søren Riis","doi":"10.1109/LICS.2008.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We show that the asymptotic complexity of uniformly generated (expressible in first-order (FO) logic) prepositional tautologies for the nullstellensatz proof system (NS) as well as for polynomial calculus, (PC) has four distinct types of asymptotic behavior over fields of finite characteristic. More precisely, based on some highly non-trivial work by Krajicek, we show that for each prime p there exists a function l(n) G isin Omega(log(n)) for NS and l(n) G Omega (log(log(n)) for PC, such that the prepositional translation of any FO formula (that fails in all finite models), has degree proof complexity over fields of characteristic p, that behave in 4 mutually distinct ways: (i) The degree complexity is bound by a constant. (ii) The degree complexity is at least l(n) for all values of n. (iii) The degree complexity is at least l(n) except in a finite number of regular subsequences of infinite size, where the degree is constant. (iv) The degree complexity fluctuates in a very particular way with the degree complexity taking different constant values on an infinite number of regular subsequences each of infinite size. We leave it as an open question whether the classification remains valid for l[n) isin nOmega(1) or even for I (n) isin Omega(n). Finally, we show that for any non-empty proper subset A sube {(i), (ii), (iii), (iv)} the decision problem of whether a given input FO formula Psi has type belonging to A - is undecidable.","PeriodicalId":298300,"journal":{"name":"2008 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Asymptotic Nullstellensatz and Polynomial Calculus Proof Complexity\",\"authors\":\"Søren Riis\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.2008.30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We show that the asymptotic complexity of uniformly generated (expressible in first-order (FO) logic) prepositional tautologies for the nullstellensatz proof system (NS) as well as for polynomial calculus, (PC) has four distinct types of asymptotic behavior over fields of finite characteristic. More precisely, based on some highly non-trivial work by Krajicek, we show that for each prime p there exists a function l(n) G isin Omega(log(n)) for NS and l(n) G Omega (log(log(n)) for PC, such that the prepositional translation of any FO formula (that fails in all finite models), has degree proof complexity over fields of characteristic p, that behave in 4 mutually distinct ways: (i) The degree complexity is bound by a constant. (ii) The degree complexity is at least l(n) for all values of n. (iii) The degree complexity is at least l(n) except in a finite number of regular subsequences of infinite size, where the degree is constant. (iv) The degree complexity fluctuates in a very particular way with the degree complexity taking different constant values on an infinite number of regular subsequences each of infinite size. We leave it as an open question whether the classification remains valid for l[n) isin nOmega(1) or even for I (n) isin Omega(n). Finally, we show that for any non-empty proper subset A sube {(i), (ii), (iii), (iv)} the decision problem of whether a given input FO formula Psi has type belonging to A - is undecidable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2008.30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 23rd Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2008.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
我们证明了nullstellensatz证明系统(NS)和多项式微积分(PC)的一致生成(一阶逻辑可表示)介词重言式的渐近复杂性在有限特征域上具有四种不同类型的渐近行为。更准确地说,基于Krajicek的一些高度非平凡的工作,我们证明了对于每个素数p存在一个函数l(n) G isin (log(n))对于NS和l(n) G (log(log(n))对于PC,使得任何FO公式的前移(在所有有限模型中都失败)在特征p域上具有程度证明复杂性,表现为4种相互不同的方式:(i)程度复杂性由一个常数约束。(ii)对于所有n值,复杂度度至少为l(n)。(iii)复杂度度至少为l(n),除非在有限数量的无限大小的正则子序列中,复杂度度是恒定的。(iv)复杂度以一种非常特殊的方式波动,复杂度在无限数量的无限大小的正则子序列上取不同的常数值。对于I (n) isin(1),甚至对于I (n) isin (n),分类是否仍然有效,我们将其作为一个开放的问题。最后,我们证明了对于任意非空固有子集A子{(i), (ii), (iii), (iv)},给定输入FO公式Psi是否具有属于A -类型的决策问题是不确定的。
On the Asymptotic Nullstellensatz and Polynomial Calculus Proof Complexity
We show that the asymptotic complexity of uniformly generated (expressible in first-order (FO) logic) prepositional tautologies for the nullstellensatz proof system (NS) as well as for polynomial calculus, (PC) has four distinct types of asymptotic behavior over fields of finite characteristic. More precisely, based on some highly non-trivial work by Krajicek, we show that for each prime p there exists a function l(n) G isin Omega(log(n)) for NS and l(n) G Omega (log(log(n)) for PC, such that the prepositional translation of any FO formula (that fails in all finite models), has degree proof complexity over fields of characteristic p, that behave in 4 mutually distinct ways: (i) The degree complexity is bound by a constant. (ii) The degree complexity is at least l(n) for all values of n. (iii) The degree complexity is at least l(n) except in a finite number of regular subsequences of infinite size, where the degree is constant. (iv) The degree complexity fluctuates in a very particular way with the degree complexity taking different constant values on an infinite number of regular subsequences each of infinite size. We leave it as an open question whether the classification remains valid for l[n) isin nOmega(1) or even for I (n) isin Omega(n). Finally, we show that for any non-empty proper subset A sube {(i), (ii), (iii), (iv)} the decision problem of whether a given input FO formula Psi has type belonging to A - is undecidable.