已婚夫妇税收筹划与家庭内收入不平等

Thiess Buettner, Katharina Erbe, Veronika Grimm
{"title":"已婚夫妇税收筹划与家庭内收入不平等","authors":"Thiess Buettner, Katharina Erbe, Veronika Grimm","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3016803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines tax planning of married couples under separate taxation. A theoretical analysis uses a family decision-model with a household public good to show that the secondary earner might veto against tax planning if the realization of tax savings increases intra-household income inequality. The empirical analysis exploits a specific feature of the German tax system, which allows married couples to save taxes by deviating from the default symmetric payroll-tax treatment and assigning a favorable tax treatment to the primary earner and an unfavorable tax treatment to the secondary earner. Based on a representative random sample of individual tax files, the empirical results confirm the role of the income distribution. Opting for a tax-minimizing treatment is found to be less likely if this is associated with larger losses in the net income of the secondary earner. While this holds irrespective of which of the spouses has higher earnings, couples where the wife is the primary earner display a general reluctance to assign the favorable tax treatment to the wife.","PeriodicalId":330166,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax Planning of Married Couples and Intra-Household Income Inequality\",\"authors\":\"Thiess Buettner, Katharina Erbe, Veronika Grimm\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3016803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines tax planning of married couples under separate taxation. A theoretical analysis uses a family decision-model with a household public good to show that the secondary earner might veto against tax planning if the realization of tax savings increases intra-household income inequality. The empirical analysis exploits a specific feature of the German tax system, which allows married couples to save taxes by deviating from the default symmetric payroll-tax treatment and assigning a favorable tax treatment to the primary earner and an unfavorable tax treatment to the secondary earner. Based on a representative random sample of individual tax files, the empirical results confirm the role of the income distribution. Opting for a tax-minimizing treatment is found to be less likely if this is associated with larger losses in the net income of the secondary earner. While this holds irrespective of which of the spouses has higher earnings, couples where the wife is the primary earner display a general reluctance to assign the favorable tax treatment to the wife.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3016803\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: Public Law - Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3016803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文研究了分开征税情况下已婚夫妇的税收筹划问题。理论分析表明,如果实现税收节约增加了家庭内部收入不平等,二级收入者可能会否决税收筹划。实证分析利用了德国税收制度的一个特定特征,它允许已婚夫妇通过偏离默认的对称工资税待遇,并为主要收入者分配有利的税收待遇,而为次要收入者分配不利的税收待遇来节省税收。基于具有代表性的个人税务档案随机样本,实证结果证实了收入分配的作用。研究发现,如果二级收入者的净收入损失较大,那么选择最小化税收的做法就不太可能。虽然这与夫妻中哪一方的收入更高无关,但妻子是主要收入来源的夫妇普遍不愿将优惠的税收待遇分配给妻子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tax Planning of Married Couples and Intra-Household Income Inequality
This paper examines tax planning of married couples under separate taxation. A theoretical analysis uses a family decision-model with a household public good to show that the secondary earner might veto against tax planning if the realization of tax savings increases intra-household income inequality. The empirical analysis exploits a specific feature of the German tax system, which allows married couples to save taxes by deviating from the default symmetric payroll-tax treatment and assigning a favorable tax treatment to the primary earner and an unfavorable tax treatment to the secondary earner. Based on a representative random sample of individual tax files, the empirical results confirm the role of the income distribution. Opting for a tax-minimizing treatment is found to be less likely if this is associated with larger losses in the net income of the secondary earner. While this holds irrespective of which of the spouses has higher earnings, couples where the wife is the primary earner display a general reluctance to assign the favorable tax treatment to the wife.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Misdirected Recipients of Tax Reform: Section 199A, its True Beneficiaries, and Application to Low- and Middle- Income Residents Consistent Taxation in a Cashless Society Is It Time to Eliminate Federal Corporate Income Taxes? Brief of Amici Curiae Former Government Officials in Support of Respondents, CIC Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service Allocating COVID-19 State Aid Equitably – The Case of Denmark
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1