当bdd失败时:符号化执行和SMT解决的一致性测试

Elisabeth Jöbstl, Martin Weiglhofer, B. Aichernig, F. Wotawa
{"title":"当bdd失败时:符号化执行和SMT解决的一致性测试","authors":"Elisabeth Jöbstl, Martin Weiglhofer, B. Aichernig, F. Wotawa","doi":"10.1109/ICST.2010.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Model-based testing is a well known technique that allows one to validate the correctness of software with respect to its model. If a lot of data is involved, symbolic techniques usually outperform explicit data enumeration. In this paper, we focus on a new symbolic test case generation technique. Our approach is based on symbolic execution and on satisfiability (modulo theory; SMT) solving. Our work was motivated by the complete failure of a well-known existing symbolic test case generator to produce any test cases for an industrial Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation. Hence, we have replaced the BDD-based analysis of the existing tool with a combination of symbolic execution and SMT solving. Our new tool generates the test cases for SIP in seconds. However, further experiments showed that our approach is not a substitutive but a complementary approach: we present the technique and the results obtained for two protocol specifications, the first supporting our new technique, the second being witness for the classic BDD-technique.","PeriodicalId":192678,"journal":{"name":"2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When BDDs Fail: Conformance Testing with Symbolic Execution and SMT Solving\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Jöbstl, Martin Weiglhofer, B. Aichernig, F. Wotawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICST.2010.48\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Model-based testing is a well known technique that allows one to validate the correctness of software with respect to its model. If a lot of data is involved, symbolic techniques usually outperform explicit data enumeration. In this paper, we focus on a new symbolic test case generation technique. Our approach is based on symbolic execution and on satisfiability (modulo theory; SMT) solving. Our work was motivated by the complete failure of a well-known existing symbolic test case generator to produce any test cases for an industrial Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation. Hence, we have replaced the BDD-based analysis of the existing tool with a combination of symbolic execution and SMT solving. Our new tool generates the test cases for SIP in seconds. However, further experiments showed that our approach is not a substitutive but a complementary approach: we present the technique and the results obtained for two protocol specifications, the first supporting our new technique, the second being witness for the classic BDD-technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2010.48\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 Third International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST.2010.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

基于模型的测试是一种众所周知的技术,它允许人们根据其模型验证软件的正确性。如果涉及大量数据,符号技术通常优于显式数据枚举。在本文中,我们重点研究了一种新的符号测试用例生成技术。我们的方法是基于符号执行和可满足性(模理论;SMT)解决。我们的工作是由一个众所周知的现有的符号测试用例生成器的完全失败所驱动的,它无法为工业会话发起协议(SIP)实现生成任何测试用例。因此,我们已经用符号执行和SMT求解的组合取代了现有工具的基于bdd的分析。我们的新工具在几秒钟内为SIP生成测试用例。然而,进一步的实验表明,我们的方法不是一种替代方法,而是一种补充方法:我们提出了两种协议规范的技术和结果,第一个支持我们的新技术,第二个是经典bdd技术的见证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When BDDs Fail: Conformance Testing with Symbolic Execution and SMT Solving
Model-based testing is a well known technique that allows one to validate the correctness of software with respect to its model. If a lot of data is involved, symbolic techniques usually outperform explicit data enumeration. In this paper, we focus on a new symbolic test case generation technique. Our approach is based on symbolic execution and on satisfiability (modulo theory; SMT) solving. Our work was motivated by the complete failure of a well-known existing symbolic test case generator to produce any test cases for an industrial Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) implementation. Hence, we have replaced the BDD-based analysis of the existing tool with a combination of symbolic execution and SMT solving. Our new tool generates the test cases for SIP in seconds. However, further experiments showed that our approach is not a substitutive but a complementary approach: we present the technique and the results obtained for two protocol specifications, the first supporting our new technique, the second being witness for the classic BDD-technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using Mutation to Automatically Suggest Fixes for Faulty Programs Holistic Model-Based Testing for Business Information Systems Prioritizing State-Based Aspect Tests Towards Automated, Formal Verification of Model Transformations (Un-)Covering Equivalent Mutants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1