确定调查方法-更新旧概念以提高可靠性

A. Naschenveng, Lucas Isaac, F. Laroca, Cláudio Franceschi, A. Neves, Fábio Canté, Adrian G. Ledroz, A. Carrasquilla
{"title":"确定调查方法-更新旧概念以提高可靠性","authors":"A. Naschenveng, Lucas Isaac, F. Laroca, Cláudio Franceschi, A. Neves, Fábio Canté, Adrian G. Ledroz, A. Carrasquilla","doi":"10.2118/212492-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Data quality assurance applied to well positioning optimizes contingency plans to reduce the time to drill a relief well and provides greater reliability in autonomous and remote drilling operations. In addition, it provides the highest degree of agreement with the well design, making it possible to reach the best productive zones of the reservoir and avoid geological risks. This data quality assurance procedure supports the construction of high-productivity wells in the offshore pre-salt fields in Brazil. The objective of this work is to present the results of the Definitive Survey Methodology in pre-salt wells, to improve the survey quality assurance and the reduction of uncertainty ellipses - during operation and in real-time - using two survey tools with different physical principles.\n The Definitive Survey Methodology promotes the verification of error models of the survey tools and reduces the Ellipses of Uncertainty (EOU), well to well, creating an external directional data quality assurance, which goes beyond specific internal quality controls used by service companies. The methodology consists of the use of three tests that compare independent surveys. The first and second tests are statistical, Relative Instrument Performance (RIP), and Chi-square, in which the reliability of the used error models is verified. The RIP test is a comparison that produces results with quantitative values about the agreement of overlapping surveys. The Chi-square test is a quality fit test that compares two surveys and their compliances with their error models. The third test is a qualitative geometric test that compares the uncertainty ellipses of different survey tools at the same depth, allowing a quick interpretation of graphic representations and can be applied during or after drilling.\n The methodology was applied in four pre-salt wells named in this paper as Well_A, Well_B, Well_C, and Well_D. The final measured depths of the wells range from 5078m to 6801m. The tools used were: gyro while drilling (GWD) for all inclinations in real-time (inrun), GWD outrun memory mode (OMM), drop gyros, and measurement while drilling (MWD). The methodology resulted in a reduction of 74.55% (Well_A), 50.93% (Well_B), 33.69% (Well_C), and 60.05% (Well_D) of the ellipse of uncertainty at the top of the reservoir.\n The use of the Definitive Survey Methodology enhances the quality of the directional data, verifying the error models used well to well. The reduction of uncertainties provided by the gyroscopic tool ensures the reliability of the contingency plan and the entry into the top of the reservoir. Consequently, by optimizing the positioning of the wells, it is expected to make the most of the natural resources in the long term, while also building safer contingency plans, and making the extraction activity of this natural resource more sustainable.","PeriodicalId":255336,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Definitive Survey Methodology – Update to an Old Concept for Higher Reliability\",\"authors\":\"A. Naschenveng, Lucas Isaac, F. Laroca, Cláudio Franceschi, A. Neves, Fábio Canté, Adrian G. Ledroz, A. Carrasquilla\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/212492-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Data quality assurance applied to well positioning optimizes contingency plans to reduce the time to drill a relief well and provides greater reliability in autonomous and remote drilling operations. In addition, it provides the highest degree of agreement with the well design, making it possible to reach the best productive zones of the reservoir and avoid geological risks. This data quality assurance procedure supports the construction of high-productivity wells in the offshore pre-salt fields in Brazil. The objective of this work is to present the results of the Definitive Survey Methodology in pre-salt wells, to improve the survey quality assurance and the reduction of uncertainty ellipses - during operation and in real-time - using two survey tools with different physical principles.\\n The Definitive Survey Methodology promotes the verification of error models of the survey tools and reduces the Ellipses of Uncertainty (EOU), well to well, creating an external directional data quality assurance, which goes beyond specific internal quality controls used by service companies. The methodology consists of the use of three tests that compare independent surveys. The first and second tests are statistical, Relative Instrument Performance (RIP), and Chi-square, in which the reliability of the used error models is verified. The RIP test is a comparison that produces results with quantitative values about the agreement of overlapping surveys. The Chi-square test is a quality fit test that compares two surveys and their compliances with their error models. The third test is a qualitative geometric test that compares the uncertainty ellipses of different survey tools at the same depth, allowing a quick interpretation of graphic representations and can be applied during or after drilling.\\n The methodology was applied in four pre-salt wells named in this paper as Well_A, Well_B, Well_C, and Well_D. The final measured depths of the wells range from 5078m to 6801m. The tools used were: gyro while drilling (GWD) for all inclinations in real-time (inrun), GWD outrun memory mode (OMM), drop gyros, and measurement while drilling (MWD). The methodology resulted in a reduction of 74.55% (Well_A), 50.93% (Well_B), 33.69% (Well_C), and 60.05% (Well_D) of the ellipse of uncertainty at the top of the reservoir.\\n The use of the Definitive Survey Methodology enhances the quality of the directional data, verifying the error models used well to well. The reduction of uncertainties provided by the gyroscopic tool ensures the reliability of the contingency plan and the entry into the top of the reservoir. Consequently, by optimizing the positioning of the wells, it is expected to make the most of the natural resources in the long term, while also building safer contingency plans, and making the extraction activity of this natural resource more sustainable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/212492-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 09, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/212492-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应用于井定位的数据质量保证优化了应急计划,减少了钻井减压井的时间,并在自主和远程钻井作业中提供了更高的可靠性。此外,它提供了与井设计的最高一致性,使其能够达到油藏的最佳生产区域并避免地质风险。该数据质量保证程序为巴西海上盐下油田的高产井建设提供了支持。这项工作的目的是在盐下井中展示最终调查方法的结果,以提高调查质量保证和减少不确定性椭圆-在操作期间和实时-使用两种不同物理原理的调查工具。最终测量方法促进了测量工具误差模型的验证,并减少了井与井之间的不确定性椭圆(EOU),创建了外部定向数据质量保证,这超越了服务公司使用的特定内部质量控制。该方法包括使用三个比较独立调查的测试。第一次和第二次检验是统计、相对仪器性能(RIP)和卡方检验,其中使用的误差模型的可靠性得到验证。RIP测试是一种比较,产生关于重叠调查一致性的定量值。卡方检验是一种质量拟合检验,用于比较两个调查及其与误差模型的遵从性。第三个测试是定性几何测试,比较不同测量工具在相同深度的不确定椭圆,允许快速解释图形表示,并可以在钻井期间或之后应用。本文将该方法应用于4口盐下井,分别为Well_A、Well_B、Well_C和Well_D。最终测量的井深范围为5078米至6801m。使用的工具有:实时测量所有斜度(inrun)的随钻陀螺仪(GWD)、随钻陀螺仪运行记忆模式(OMM)、下落陀螺仪和随钻测量(MWD)。结果表明,该方法将储层顶部的不确定性椭圆降低了74.55% (Well_A)、50.93% (Well_B)、33.69% (Well_C)和60.05% (Well_D)。最终测量方法的使用提高了定向数据的质量,验证了井与井之间使用的误差模型。陀螺仪工具减少了不确定性,确保了应急计划和进入油藏顶部的可靠性。因此,通过优化井的位置,有望在长期内充分利用自然资源,同时建立更安全的应急计划,并使这种自然资源的开采活动更具可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Definitive Survey Methodology – Update to an Old Concept for Higher Reliability
Data quality assurance applied to well positioning optimizes contingency plans to reduce the time to drill a relief well and provides greater reliability in autonomous and remote drilling operations. In addition, it provides the highest degree of agreement with the well design, making it possible to reach the best productive zones of the reservoir and avoid geological risks. This data quality assurance procedure supports the construction of high-productivity wells in the offshore pre-salt fields in Brazil. The objective of this work is to present the results of the Definitive Survey Methodology in pre-salt wells, to improve the survey quality assurance and the reduction of uncertainty ellipses - during operation and in real-time - using two survey tools with different physical principles. The Definitive Survey Methodology promotes the verification of error models of the survey tools and reduces the Ellipses of Uncertainty (EOU), well to well, creating an external directional data quality assurance, which goes beyond specific internal quality controls used by service companies. The methodology consists of the use of three tests that compare independent surveys. The first and second tests are statistical, Relative Instrument Performance (RIP), and Chi-square, in which the reliability of the used error models is verified. The RIP test is a comparison that produces results with quantitative values about the agreement of overlapping surveys. The Chi-square test is a quality fit test that compares two surveys and their compliances with their error models. The third test is a qualitative geometric test that compares the uncertainty ellipses of different survey tools at the same depth, allowing a quick interpretation of graphic representations and can be applied during or after drilling. The methodology was applied in four pre-salt wells named in this paper as Well_A, Well_B, Well_C, and Well_D. The final measured depths of the wells range from 5078m to 6801m. The tools used were: gyro while drilling (GWD) for all inclinations in real-time (inrun), GWD outrun memory mode (OMM), drop gyros, and measurement while drilling (MWD). The methodology resulted in a reduction of 74.55% (Well_A), 50.93% (Well_B), 33.69% (Well_C), and 60.05% (Well_D) of the ellipse of uncertainty at the top of the reservoir. The use of the Definitive Survey Methodology enhances the quality of the directional data, verifying the error models used well to well. The reduction of uncertainties provided by the gyroscopic tool ensures the reliability of the contingency plan and the entry into the top of the reservoir. Consequently, by optimizing the positioning of the wells, it is expected to make the most of the natural resources in the long term, while also building safer contingency plans, and making the extraction activity of this natural resource more sustainable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geothermal Drilling – Collaborative and Holistic Applications Specific Solutions Drive Consistent Improvements in Drilling Efficiency and Operational Costs Downhole Trajectory Automation of RSS Tools: Autonomous Drilling Becomes Reality While-Drilling Pore Pressure Surveillance Using Machine Learning Drilling Three-Mile Laterals Tighter and Safer with a New Magnetic Reference Technique Continuous or Stacked Cement Bond Logs – Does It Matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1