Concod:精确的基于共识的方法,从高通量测序数据中调用删除

Xiaodong Zhang, Chong Chu, Yao Zhang, Y. Wu, Jingyang Gao
{"title":"Concod:精确的基于共识的方法,从高通量测序数据中调用删除","authors":"Xiaodong Zhang, Chong Chu, Yao Zhang, Y. Wu, Jingyang Gao","doi":"10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate calling of structural variations such as deletions with short sequence reads from high-throughput sequencing is an important but challenging problem in the field of genome analysis. There are many existing methods for calling deletions. At present, not a single method clearly outperforms all other methods in precision and sensitivity. A popular strategy used by several authors is combining different signatures left by deletions in order to achieve more accurate deletion calling. However, most existing methods using the combining approach are heuristic and the called deletions by these tools still contain many wrongly called deletions. In this paper, we present Concod, a machine learning based framework for calling deletions with consensus, which is able to more accurately detect and distinguish true deletions from falsely called ones. First, Concod collects candidate deletions by merging the output of multiple existing deletion calling tools. Then, features of each candidate are extracted from aligned reads based on multiple detection theories. Finally, a machine learning model is trained with these features and used to classify the true and false candidates. We test our approach on different coverage of real data and compare with existing tools, including Pindel, SVseq2, BreakDancer, and DELLY. Results show that Concod improves both precision and sensitivity of deletion calling significantly.","PeriodicalId":345384,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concod: Accurate consensus-based approach of calling deletions from high-throughput sequencing data\",\"authors\":\"Xiaodong Zhang, Chong Chu, Yao Zhang, Y. Wu, Jingyang Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822495\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate calling of structural variations such as deletions with short sequence reads from high-throughput sequencing is an important but challenging problem in the field of genome analysis. There are many existing methods for calling deletions. At present, not a single method clearly outperforms all other methods in precision and sensitivity. A popular strategy used by several authors is combining different signatures left by deletions in order to achieve more accurate deletion calling. However, most existing methods using the combining approach are heuristic and the called deletions by these tools still contain many wrongly called deletions. In this paper, we present Concod, a machine learning based framework for calling deletions with consensus, which is able to more accurately detect and distinguish true deletions from falsely called ones. First, Concod collects candidate deletions by merging the output of multiple existing deletion calling tools. Then, features of each candidate are extracted from aligned reads based on multiple detection theories. Finally, a machine learning model is trained with these features and used to classify the true and false candidates. We test our approach on different coverage of real data and compare with existing tools, including Pindel, SVseq2, BreakDancer, and DELLY. Results show that Concod improves both precision and sensitivity of deletion calling significantly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":345384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BIBM.2016.7822495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从高通量测序中准确识别短序列缺失等结构变异是基因组分析领域的一个重要但具有挑战性的问题。有许多调用删除的现有方法。目前,没有一种方法在精度和灵敏度上明显优于所有其他方法。一些作者使用的一种流行策略是将删除留下的不同签名组合起来,以实现更准确的删除调用。然而,现有的组合方法大多是启发式的,这些工具的所谓删除仍然包含许多错误的删除。在本文中,我们提出了Concod,一个基于机器学习的共识删除调用框架,它能够更准确地检测和区分真正的删除和错误的删除调用。首先,Concod通过合并多个现有删除调用工具的输出来收集候选删除。然后,基于多种检测理论,从对齐的reads中提取每个候选的特征。最后,使用这些特征训练机器学习模型,并用于对真假候选对象进行分类。我们在真实数据的不同覆盖范围上测试了我们的方法,并与现有工具(包括Pindel, SVseq2, BreakDancer和DELLY)进行了比较。结果表明,Concod显著提高了缺失调用的精度和灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Concod: Accurate consensus-based approach of calling deletions from high-throughput sequencing data
Accurate calling of structural variations such as deletions with short sequence reads from high-throughput sequencing is an important but challenging problem in the field of genome analysis. There are many existing methods for calling deletions. At present, not a single method clearly outperforms all other methods in precision and sensitivity. A popular strategy used by several authors is combining different signatures left by deletions in order to achieve more accurate deletion calling. However, most existing methods using the combining approach are heuristic and the called deletions by these tools still contain many wrongly called deletions. In this paper, we present Concod, a machine learning based framework for calling deletions with consensus, which is able to more accurately detect and distinguish true deletions from falsely called ones. First, Concod collects candidate deletions by merging the output of multiple existing deletion calling tools. Then, features of each candidate are extracted from aligned reads based on multiple detection theories. Finally, a machine learning model is trained with these features and used to classify the true and false candidates. We test our approach on different coverage of real data and compare with existing tools, including Pindel, SVseq2, BreakDancer, and DELLY. Results show that Concod improves both precision and sensitivity of deletion calling significantly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of high performance, grid and cloud computing in high-throughput sequencing A novel algorithm for identifying essential proteins by integrating subcellular localization CNNsite: Prediction of DNA-binding residues in proteins using Convolutional Neural Network with sequence features Inferring Social Influence of anti-Tobacco mass media campaigns Emotion recognition from multi-channel EEG data through Convolutional Recurrent Neural Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1