片上VLSI互连的串扰分析

M. Jayamma, N. Ramanjaneyulu, A. Sathish, Y. M. Rao
{"title":"片上VLSI互连的串扰分析","authors":"M. Jayamma, N. Ramanjaneyulu, A. Sathish, Y. M. Rao","doi":"10.58482/ijeresm.v1i4.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper dynamic crosstalk is analyzed for coupled on-chip VLSI interconnects in different conditions. The proposed work has taken the MOS transistor analytical expressions. In this work, calculated the transition delays and different timings of the interconnect aggressor and interconnect victim drivers for in-phase switching and out-of-phase switching. All the calculated results are compared with simulations in\nSPICE. The average error in the transmission delay using SPICE is 2.02 and 3.274% for the interconnect aggressor and interconnect victim buffers for in phase switching, respectively. The average errors in the same are 2.3 and 1.87% for out phase switching event.","PeriodicalId":351005,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Crosstalk Analysis of On-chip VLSI Interconnects\",\"authors\":\"M. Jayamma, N. Ramanjaneyulu, A. Sathish, Y. M. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.58482/ijeresm.v1i4.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper dynamic crosstalk is analyzed for coupled on-chip VLSI interconnects in different conditions. The proposed work has taken the MOS transistor analytical expressions. In this work, calculated the transition delays and different timings of the interconnect aggressor and interconnect victim drivers for in-phase switching and out-of-phase switching. All the calculated results are compared with simulations in\\nSPICE. The average error in the transmission delay using SPICE is 2.02 and 3.274% for the interconnect aggressor and interconnect victim buffers for in phase switching, respectively. The average errors in the same are 2.3 and 1.87% for out phase switching event.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58482/ijeresm.v1i4.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering, Science, and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58482/ijeresm.v1i4.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对片上耦合VLSI互连在不同条件下的动态串扰进行了分析。本文采用了MOS晶体管的解析表达式。在这项工作中,计算了互联攻击者和互联受害者驱动在同相切换和非相切换时的过渡延迟和不同的时序。所有的计算结果都与inSPICE的仿真结果进行了比较。对于同相交换的互连攻击缓冲区和互连受害者缓冲区,使用SPICE的传输延迟平均误差分别为2.02和3.274%。出相开关事件的平均误差分别为2.3和1.87%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Crosstalk Analysis of On-chip VLSI Interconnects
In this paper dynamic crosstalk is analyzed for coupled on-chip VLSI interconnects in different conditions. The proposed work has taken the MOS transistor analytical expressions. In this work, calculated the transition delays and different timings of the interconnect aggressor and interconnect victim drivers for in-phase switching and out-of-phase switching. All the calculated results are compared with simulations in SPICE. The average error in the transmission delay using SPICE is 2.02 and 3.274% for the interconnect aggressor and interconnect victim buffers for in phase switching, respectively. The average errors in the same are 2.3 and 1.87% for out phase switching event.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing the Organization Culture Influence in Employee Involvement and Empowerment Light Attenuation Prior based Underwater Image Enhancement Multi-exposure Image Fusion using Patchbased Component Decomposition Hygiene Bio-Toilet Model for Energy Generation An Examination of the Implications of Transformative Leadership on the Perceptions Towards the Workplace
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1