柏拉图思想的Anthyphairetic革命

S. Negrepontis
{"title":"柏拉图思想的Anthyphairetic革命","authors":"S. Negrepontis","doi":"10.1515/9783110565959-013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present work it is shown, by an examination of the Platonic dialogues Theaetetus, Sophistes, Politicus, and Philebus, that (a) a Platonic Idea is the philosophic analogue of a pair of lines incommensurable in length only, (b) the Division and Collection, the method by which humans obtain knowledge of a Platonic Idea, is the philosophic analogue of the palindromically periodic anthyphairesis of this pair, and (c) a Platonic Idea is One in the sense of the self-similarity induced by periodic anthyphairesis. \nA byproduct of the above analysis is that (d) Theaetetus had obtained a proof of the Proposition: The anthyphairesis of a dyad of lines incommensurable in length only is palindromically periodic. It is further verified that the concepts and tools contained in the Theaetetean Book X of the Elements suffice for the proof of the Proposition.","PeriodicalId":429168,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: History and Overview","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Anthyphairetic Revolutions of the Platonic Ideas\",\"authors\":\"S. Negrepontis\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110565959-013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present work it is shown, by an examination of the Platonic dialogues Theaetetus, Sophistes, Politicus, and Philebus, that (a) a Platonic Idea is the philosophic analogue of a pair of lines incommensurable in length only, (b) the Division and Collection, the method by which humans obtain knowledge of a Platonic Idea, is the philosophic analogue of the palindromically periodic anthyphairesis of this pair, and (c) a Platonic Idea is One in the sense of the self-similarity induced by periodic anthyphairesis. \\nA byproduct of the above analysis is that (d) Theaetetus had obtained a proof of the Proposition: The anthyphairesis of a dyad of lines incommensurable in length only is palindromically periodic. It is further verified that the concepts and tools contained in the Theaetetean Book X of the Elements suffice for the proof of the Proposition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":429168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv: History and Overview\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv: History and Overview\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110565959-013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110565959-013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本著作中,通过对柏拉图对话录《泰阿忒忒》、《诡辩》、《政治》和《菲利伯斯》的考察,我们可以发现:(a)柏拉图的理念是一对长度不可通约的诗句的哲学类比;(b)人类获取柏拉图理念知识的方法——分集法,是这对诗句的回文周期性的anthyphairesis的哲学类比;(3)柏拉图的理念在周期性的自我模仿所引起的自我相似的意义上是一体的。上述分析的一个副产品是(d)忒阿提图斯得到了这个命题的一个证明:只有长度不可通约的两对线的重合是回文周期性的。经进一步证实,《要素论》第十卷所载的概念和工具足以证明这个命题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Anthyphairetic Revolutions of the Platonic Ideas
In the present work it is shown, by an examination of the Platonic dialogues Theaetetus, Sophistes, Politicus, and Philebus, that (a) a Platonic Idea is the philosophic analogue of a pair of lines incommensurable in length only, (b) the Division and Collection, the method by which humans obtain knowledge of a Platonic Idea, is the philosophic analogue of the palindromically periodic anthyphairesis of this pair, and (c) a Platonic Idea is One in the sense of the self-similarity induced by periodic anthyphairesis. A byproduct of the above analysis is that (d) Theaetetus had obtained a proof of the Proposition: The anthyphairesis of a dyad of lines incommensurable in length only is palindromically periodic. It is further verified that the concepts and tools contained in the Theaetetean Book X of the Elements suffice for the proof of the Proposition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Automorphism Group of the Petersen Graph is Isomorphic to $S_5$. Early-Dynastic Tables from Southern Mesopotamia, or the Multiple Facets of the Quantification of Surfaces Teaching Programming for Mathematical Scientists The Classification of Magic SET Squares The role of history in learning and teaching mathematics: A personal perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1