价值观问题:美国与国际难民规范之间的持续分歧

C. P. Blum
{"title":"价值观问题:美国与国际难民规范之间的持续分歧","authors":"C. P. Blum","doi":"10.15779/Z38V939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When the comprehensive Refugee Act was passed in 1980, it was hailed as \"one of the most important pieces of humanitarian legislation ever enacted by a United States Congress.\"' The Refugee Act was one of the first U.S. laws that sought to codify U.S. obligations pursuant to a United Nations multilateral human rights treaty. 2 To that extent, it was a significant step forward in bringing the U.S. into compliance with its international human rights obligations. But international human rights treaties are much more than the four corners of a document, to be codified in domestic law. They represent a set of political values, collectively understood, to guarantee and respect the life, liberty and security of individuals by their governments.3 This is the essence of the social","PeriodicalId":325917,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Question of Values: Continuing Divergences between U.S. and International Refugee Norms\",\"authors\":\"C. P. Blum\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z38V939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When the comprehensive Refugee Act was passed in 1980, it was hailed as \\\"one of the most important pieces of humanitarian legislation ever enacted by a United States Congress.\\\"' The Refugee Act was one of the first U.S. laws that sought to codify U.S. obligations pursuant to a United Nations multilateral human rights treaty. 2 To that extent, it was a significant step forward in bringing the U.S. into compliance with its international human rights obligations. But international human rights treaties are much more than the four corners of a document, to be codified in domestic law. They represent a set of political values, collectively understood, to guarantee and respect the life, liberty and security of individuals by their governments.3 This is the essence of the social\",\"PeriodicalId\":325917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38V939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38V939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

1980年,当全面的《难民法》(Refugee Act)通过时,它被誉为“美国国会有史以来最重要的人道主义立法之一”。《难民法》是第一批试图将美国根据联合国多边人权条约承担的义务编入法典的美国法律之一。从这个意义上说,这是促使美国履行其国际人权义务的重要一步。但国际人权条约远不只是一份文件的四个部分,要写入国内法。它们代表了一套政治价值观,被各国政府共同理解,以保障和尊重个人的生命、自由和安全这是社会的本质
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Question of Values: Continuing Divergences between U.S. and International Refugee Norms
When the comprehensive Refugee Act was passed in 1980, it was hailed as "one of the most important pieces of humanitarian legislation ever enacted by a United States Congress."' The Refugee Act was one of the first U.S. laws that sought to codify U.S. obligations pursuant to a United Nations multilateral human rights treaty. 2 To that extent, it was a significant step forward in bringing the U.S. into compliance with its international human rights obligations. But international human rights treaties are much more than the four corners of a document, to be codified in domestic law. They represent a set of political values, collectively understood, to guarantee and respect the life, liberty and security of individuals by their governments.3 This is the essence of the social
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maritime Interdiction of North Korean Ships under UN Sanctions The South China Sea as a Challenge to International Law and to International Legal Scholarship Back in the Game: International Humanitarian Lawmaking by States International Law and Corporate Participation in Times of Armed Conflict Reversing the Two Wrong Turns in the Economic Analysis of International Law: A Club Goods Theory of Treaty Membership & European Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1