组合频差法识别物理不可克隆功能的设计弱点

D. Kuhn, M. Raunak, Charles B. Prado, Vinay C. Patil, R. Kacker
{"title":"组合频差法识别物理不可克隆功能的设计弱点","authors":"D. Kuhn, M. Raunak, Charles B. Prado, Vinay C. Patil, R. Kacker","doi":"10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Combinatorial coverage measures have been defined and applied to a wide range of problems. These methods have been developed using measures that depend on the inclusion or absence of t-tuples of values in inputs and test cases. We extend these coverage measures to include the frequency of occurrence of combinations, in an approach that we refer to as combination frequency differencing (CFD). This method is particularly suited to artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) applications, where training data sets used in learning systems are dependent on the prevalence of various attributes of elements of class and non-class sets. We illustrate the use of this method by applying it to analyzing the susceptibility of physical unclonable functions (PUFs) to machine learning attacks. Preliminary results suggest that the method may be useful for identifying bit combinations that have a disproportionately strong influence on PUF response bit values.","PeriodicalId":147133,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination Frequency Differencing for Identifying Design Weaknesses in Physical Unclonable Functions\",\"authors\":\"D. Kuhn, M. Raunak, Charles B. Prado, Vinay C. Patil, R. Kacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Combinatorial coverage measures have been defined and applied to a wide range of problems. These methods have been developed using measures that depend on the inclusion or absence of t-tuples of values in inputs and test cases. We extend these coverage measures to include the frequency of occurrence of combinations, in an approach that we refer to as combination frequency differencing (CFD). This method is particularly suited to artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) applications, where training data sets used in learning systems are dependent on the prevalence of various attributes of elements of class and non-class sets. We illustrate the use of this method by applying it to analyzing the susceptibility of physical unclonable functions (PUFs) to machine learning attacks. Preliminary results suggest that the method may be useful for identifying bit combinations that have a disproportionately strong influence on PUF response bit values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTW55395.2022.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

组合覆盖度量已被定义并应用于广泛的问题。这些方法是使用依赖于输入和测试用例中值的t元组的包含或缺少的度量来开发的。我们扩展了这些覆盖措施,以包括组合发生的频率,我们将这种方法称为组合频率差异(CFD)。这种方法特别适用于人工智能和机器学习(AI/ML)应用,在这些应用中,学习系统中使用的训练数据集依赖于类和非类集元素的各种属性的流行程度。我们通过将这种方法应用于分析物理不可克隆函数(puf)对机器学习攻击的敏感性来说明这种方法的使用。初步结果表明,该方法可用于识别对PUF响应位值有不成比例的强烈影响的位组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combination Frequency Differencing for Identifying Design Weaknesses in Physical Unclonable Functions
Combinatorial coverage measures have been defined and applied to a wide range of problems. These methods have been developed using measures that depend on the inclusion or absence of t-tuples of values in inputs and test cases. We extend these coverage measures to include the frequency of occurrence of combinations, in an approach that we refer to as combination frequency differencing (CFD). This method is particularly suited to artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) applications, where training data sets used in learning systems are dependent on the prevalence of various attributes of elements of class and non-class sets. We illustrate the use of this method by applying it to analyzing the susceptibility of physical unclonable functions (PUFs) to machine learning attacks. Preliminary results suggest that the method may be useful for identifying bit combinations that have a disproportionately strong influence on PUF response bit values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Preliminary Study on Generating Well-Formed Q# Quantum Programs for Fuzz Testing Security Testing as part of Software Quality Assurance: Principles and Challenges Software Bug Prediction Model Based on Mathematical Graph Features Metrics New Ranking Formulas to Improve Spectrum Based Fault Localization Via Systematic Search Software Architecture Elements Applied to Software Test: View, Viewpoints and Containers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1