用集体行动理论预测心理学家对学术互惠和数据共享的态度

Tae Hee Lee, Minah H. Jung, Youngseek Kim
{"title":"用集体行动理论预测心理学家对学术互惠和数据共享的态度","authors":"Tae Hee Lee, Minah H. Jung, Youngseek Kim","doi":"10.1108/el-10-2022-0232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate the factors influencing the data sharing habits of psychologists with respect to academic reciprocity.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA research model was developed based on Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action to map psychologists’ underlying motivations for data sharing. The model was validated by data from a survey of 427 psychologists, primarily from the psychological sciences and related disciplines.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study found that data sharing among psychologists is driven primarily by their perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and the norms of data sharing. This study also found that academic reciprocity is significantly influenced by psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing. Both academic reputation and academic reciprocity are affected by psychologists’ prior experiences with data reuse. Additionally, psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits and the norms of data sharing are significantly affected by the perception of their academic reputation.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study suggests that Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action can provide a new theoretical lens in understanding psychologists’ data sharing behaviours.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis study suggests several practical implications for the design and promotion of data sharing in the research community of psychology.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the initial studies that applied the theory of collective action to the mechanisms of reputation, community benefits, norms and reciprocity in psychologists’ data sharing behaviour. This research demonstrates that perceived community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing can all encourage academic reciprocity, and psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and data sharing norms all facilitate their data sharing intentions.\n","PeriodicalId":330882,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Libr.","volume":"282 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting psychologists' approach to academic reciprocity and data sharing with a theory of collective action\",\"authors\":\"Tae Hee Lee, Minah H. Jung, Youngseek Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/el-10-2022-0232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to investigate the factors influencing the data sharing habits of psychologists with respect to academic reciprocity.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA research model was developed based on Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action to map psychologists’ underlying motivations for data sharing. The model was validated by data from a survey of 427 psychologists, primarily from the psychological sciences and related disciplines.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThis study found that data sharing among psychologists is driven primarily by their perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and the norms of data sharing. This study also found that academic reciprocity is significantly influenced by psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing. Both academic reputation and academic reciprocity are affected by psychologists’ prior experiences with data reuse. Additionally, psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits and the norms of data sharing are significantly affected by the perception of their academic reputation.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study suggests that Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action can provide a new theoretical lens in understanding psychologists’ data sharing behaviours.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis study suggests several practical implications for the design and promotion of data sharing in the research community of psychology.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the initial studies that applied the theory of collective action to the mechanisms of reputation, community benefits, norms and reciprocity in psychologists’ data sharing behaviour. This research demonstrates that perceived community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing can all encourage academic reciprocity, and psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and data sharing norms all facilitate their data sharing intentions.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":330882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electron. Libr.\",\"volume\":\"282 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electron. Libr.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/el-10-2022-0232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Libr.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/el-10-2022-0232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨影响心理学家在学术互惠方面数据共享习惯的因素。设计/方法论/方法基于Ostrom(2003)的集体行动理论,开发了一个研究模型,以映射心理学家数据共享的潜在动机。该模型通过对427名心理学家的调查数据得到了验证,这些心理学家主要来自心理科学和相关学科。这项研究发现,心理学家之间的数据共享主要是由他们对社区利益、学术互惠和数据共享规范的看法驱动的。研究还发现,心理学家对社区利益、学术声誉和数据共享规范的认知显著影响学术互惠。学术声誉和学术互惠都受到心理学家先前数据重用经验的影响。此外,心理学家对社区利益和数据共享规范的感知受到其学术声誉感知的显著影响。本研究认为Ostrom(2003)的集体行动理论可以为理解心理学家的数据共享行为提供一个新的理论视角。实际意义本研究对设计和促进心理学研究界的数据共享提出了几个实际意义。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是将集体行动理论应用于心理学家数据共享行为中的声誉、社区利益、规范和互惠机制的初步研究之一。本研究表明,感知社区利益、学术声誉和数据共享规范都能促进学术互惠,心理学家对社区利益、学术互惠和数据共享规范的感知都能促进其数据共享意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting psychologists' approach to academic reciprocity and data sharing with a theory of collective action
Purpose This study aims to investigate the factors influencing the data sharing habits of psychologists with respect to academic reciprocity. Design/methodology/approach A research model was developed based on Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action to map psychologists’ underlying motivations for data sharing. The model was validated by data from a survey of 427 psychologists, primarily from the psychological sciences and related disciplines. Findings This study found that data sharing among psychologists is driven primarily by their perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and the norms of data sharing. This study also found that academic reciprocity is significantly influenced by psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing. Both academic reputation and academic reciprocity are affected by psychologists’ prior experiences with data reuse. Additionally, psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits and the norms of data sharing are significantly affected by the perception of their academic reputation. Research limitations/implications This study suggests that Ostrom’s (2003) theory of collective action can provide a new theoretical lens in understanding psychologists’ data sharing behaviours. Practical implications This study suggests several practical implications for the design and promotion of data sharing in the research community of psychology. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is one of the initial studies that applied the theory of collective action to the mechanisms of reputation, community benefits, norms and reciprocity in psychologists’ data sharing behaviour. This research demonstrates that perceived community benefits, academic reputation and the norms of data sharing can all encourage academic reciprocity, and psychologists’ perceptions of community benefits, academic reciprocity and data sharing norms all facilitate their data sharing intentions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Model for integration of information and communication technologies in resource sharing practices for enhanced service delivery in academic libraries in southeast Nigeria Constructing a spatiotemporal situational awareness framework to sense the dynamic evolution of online public opinion on social media An investigation of linked data catalogue features in libraries, archives, and museums: a checklist approach Virtual and augmented reality as predictors of users' intention to use Lagos State Public Library, Lagos State, Nigeria Advanced intelligent health advice with informative summaries to facilitate treatment decision-making
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1