MiFID II:双量上限机制对市场质量的影响

Zhenkai Ran
{"title":"MiFID II:双量上限机制对市场质量的影响","authors":"Zhenkai Ran","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3891160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I provide a comprehensive evaluation of the Double Volume Cap mechanism, a regulation that regularly triggers dark trading suspension based on a stock's historical dark trading activity. By analysing the impact of each suspension wave occurring between 2018 and 2020, I show that, during the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period, the dark trading suspension improves market liquidity, worsens informational efficiency, and reduces return volatility, whereas, during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period, the suspension imposes exactly opposite effects on market quality. I also find that lifting the dark trading suspension induces exactly opposite impacts, with a larger effect size, compared to triggering suspension, providing more statistically powerful evidence of how dark trading affects market quality. These results imply that the Double Volume Cap mechanism may have brought about many unintended consequences to the market when the market needs liquidity and stability the most and when the suspension is relaxed. Nevertheless, I do identify evidence that the market gradually learns and adapts to the new trading environment as market participants reduce their reliance on dark pools over time, a result consistent with the policymaker's original objective.","PeriodicalId":233958,"journal":{"name":"European Finance eJournal","volume":"125 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MiFID II: The Impact of Double Volume Cap Mechanism on Market Quality\",\"authors\":\"Zhenkai Ran\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3891160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I provide a comprehensive evaluation of the Double Volume Cap mechanism, a regulation that regularly triggers dark trading suspension based on a stock's historical dark trading activity. By analysing the impact of each suspension wave occurring between 2018 and 2020, I show that, during the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period, the dark trading suspension improves market liquidity, worsens informational efficiency, and reduces return volatility, whereas, during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period, the suspension imposes exactly opposite effects on market quality. I also find that lifting the dark trading suspension induces exactly opposite impacts, with a larger effect size, compared to triggering suspension, providing more statistically powerful evidence of how dark trading affects market quality. These results imply that the Double Volume Cap mechanism may have brought about many unintended consequences to the market when the market needs liquidity and stability the most and when the suspension is relaxed. Nevertheless, I do identify evidence that the market gradually learns and adapts to the new trading environment as market participants reduce their reliance on dark pools over time, a result consistent with the policymaker's original objective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3891160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我对双重成交量上限机制进行了全面评估,该机制是一种根据股票的历史暗交易活动定期触发暗交易暂停的监管。通过分析2018年至2020年每一波停牌的影响,我发现,在新冠肺炎大流行前,黑暗交易停牌提高了市场流动性,恶化了信息效率,降低了回报波动性,而在新冠肺炎大流行后,停牌对市场质量的影响恰恰相反。我还发现,与触发停牌相比,解除暗交易停牌会产生完全相反的影响,且效应量更大,这为暗交易如何影响市场质量提供了更有力的统计证据。这些结果表明,在市场最需要流动性和稳定性的时候,在停牌放松的时候,双成交量上限机制可能会给市场带来许多意想不到的后果。尽管如此,我确实发现了市场逐渐学习和适应新的交易环境的证据,因为市场参与者随着时间的推移减少了对暗池的依赖,这与政策制定者的最初目标是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MiFID II: The Impact of Double Volume Cap Mechanism on Market Quality
I provide a comprehensive evaluation of the Double Volume Cap mechanism, a regulation that regularly triggers dark trading suspension based on a stock's historical dark trading activity. By analysing the impact of each suspension wave occurring between 2018 and 2020, I show that, during the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period, the dark trading suspension improves market liquidity, worsens informational efficiency, and reduces return volatility, whereas, during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period, the suspension imposes exactly opposite effects on market quality. I also find that lifting the dark trading suspension induces exactly opposite impacts, with a larger effect size, compared to triggering suspension, providing more statistically powerful evidence of how dark trading affects market quality. These results imply that the Double Volume Cap mechanism may have brought about many unintended consequences to the market when the market needs liquidity and stability the most and when the suspension is relaxed. Nevertheless, I do identify evidence that the market gradually learns and adapts to the new trading environment as market participants reduce their reliance on dark pools over time, a result consistent with the policymaker's original objective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Option-Like Fund Performance Fees in Asset Management via Monte Carlo Actuarial Distortion Pricing Cultural values of parent bank board members and lending by foreign subsidiaries: The moderating role of personal traits Deleveraging CAPM: Asset Betas vs. Equity Betas The Dynamics of Financial Policies and Group Decisions in Private Firms Money Talks: Information and Seignorage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1