发展中国家基于技术的算术干预中的性别差异

I. Zualkernan
{"title":"发展中国家基于技术的算术干预中的性别差异","authors":"I. Zualkernan","doi":"10.1109/GHTC.2015.7344005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally it has been assumed that female students in primary and secondary schools do not perform as well as their male counterparts in mathematics. However, recent research shows that females tend to do just as well or better in mathematics. While technology-based educational interventions have been used in developing countries to improve numeracy outcomes, little data is available on how and if females respond differently to these interventions than males. This is especially important because, unlike teachers, content and pedagogies used in such interventions often do not take into account gender differences. This paper presents a detailed analysis of one year technology-enabled educational interventions in public schools of a developing country to explore if there were any differences in how female students responded. The results are that despite the fact that the content and pedagogical design did not explicitly incorporate gender differences, no significant differences in learning gains or variability were found between males and females for grade II or grade V children with or without the technology-intervention. Teachers' gender, however, resulted in medium learning effects.","PeriodicalId":193664,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in a technology-based numeracy intervention in a developing country\",\"authors\":\"I. Zualkernan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GHTC.2015.7344005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditionally it has been assumed that female students in primary and secondary schools do not perform as well as their male counterparts in mathematics. However, recent research shows that females tend to do just as well or better in mathematics. While technology-based educational interventions have been used in developing countries to improve numeracy outcomes, little data is available on how and if females respond differently to these interventions than males. This is especially important because, unlike teachers, content and pedagogies used in such interventions often do not take into account gender differences. This paper presents a detailed analysis of one year technology-enabled educational interventions in public schools of a developing country to explore if there were any differences in how female students responded. The results are that despite the fact that the content and pedagogical design did not explicitly incorporate gender differences, no significant differences in learning gains or variability were found between males and females for grade II or grade V children with or without the technology-intervention. Teachers' gender, however, resulted in medium learning effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":193664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2015.7344005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GHTC.2015.7344005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

传统上,人们认为中小学女生在数学方面的表现不如男生。然而,最近的研究表明,女性在数学方面往往做得一样好,甚至更好。虽然发展中国家已使用基于技术的教育干预措施来改善计算结果,但关于女性如何以及是否对这些干预措施作出不同于男性的反应的数据很少。这一点尤其重要,因为与教师不同,这种干预所使用的内容和教学方法往往没有考虑到性别差异。本文对一个发展中国家公立学校一年的技术支持教育干预进行了详细分析,以探索女学生的反应是否有任何差异。结果是,尽管内容和教学设计没有明确地考虑性别差异,但在有或没有技术干预的二年级或五年级儿童中,男女在学习收益或可变性方面没有发现显着差异。教师性别对学习效果的影响中等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender differences in a technology-based numeracy intervention in a developing country
Traditionally it has been assumed that female students in primary and secondary schools do not perform as well as their male counterparts in mathematics. However, recent research shows that females tend to do just as well or better in mathematics. While technology-based educational interventions have been used in developing countries to improve numeracy outcomes, little data is available on how and if females respond differently to these interventions than males. This is especially important because, unlike teachers, content and pedagogies used in such interventions often do not take into account gender differences. This paper presents a detailed analysis of one year technology-enabled educational interventions in public schools of a developing country to explore if there were any differences in how female students responded. The results are that despite the fact that the content and pedagogical design did not explicitly incorporate gender differences, no significant differences in learning gains or variability were found between males and females for grade II or grade V children with or without the technology-intervention. Teachers' gender, however, resulted in medium learning effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Humanitarian logistics dashboards design-related requirements analysis Reliable LED lighting technologies key factors and procurement guidance Characteristics of a 3D-printed prosthetic hand for use in developing countries Mobile stethoscope and signal processing algorithms for pulmonary screening and diagnostics Simplified modeling of a PV panel by using PSIM and its comparison with laboratory test results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1