丑语境中的美——二者语义差异的异同

Prof. Dr. Slavka Demuthova, Prof. Dr. Andrej Demuth
{"title":"丑语境中的美——二者语义差异的异同","authors":"Prof. Dr. Slavka Demuthova, Prof. Dr. Andrej Demuth","doi":"10.33422/7th.rssconf.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the characteristics of the term of Beauty in the context of its opposite – Ugliness. In a natural language these two terms are considered to be counterparts, although several areas of research into aesthetics have suggested that they might actually overlap and may co-exist. The identification of the possible differences and similarities of the terms Beauty and Ugliness may contribute to a better understanding of Beauty. In order to define these terms, the study utilises the method of semantic differential and aims to establish which adjectives best describe the concepts of Beauty and Ugliness, based on an assessment through twenty-one bipolar adjectives grouped into the dimensions: activity, evaluation and potency. The main objective is to discover which adjectives differ in the evaluations of the terms of Beauty and Ugliness, and to what extent they differ. The research involved 1,991 subjects (53.1% of whom were female) in the age range 18 – 89 (M = 41.53 years; SD = 16.48). The term Beauty was most closely linked to adjectives such as pleasant, inviting and inspiring; Ugliness to unpleasant, repulsive and bad. In the analysis of the similarities and differences between the terms Beauty and Ugliness, a paired T-Test identified statistically significant differences in all the bipolar adjective pairs, with the exception of impulsive/judicious. The most significant differences were found in the adjective pairs of pleasant/unpleasant (t = 90.538), inviting/repulsive (t = 62.7640) and good/bad (t = 61.244) from the evaluation dimension. The method of semantic differential as well as the adjective pairs used provided a good degree of discrimination, meaning they have the potential to describe the meaning of the concepts through connotations within future studies that examine the similarities and differences between various expressions, or for the replication of this study in other linguistic or cultural regions.","PeriodicalId":251315,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 7th International Conference on Research in Social Sciences","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beauty in The Context of Ugliness – The Similarities and Differences of Their Semantic Differentials\",\"authors\":\"Prof. Dr. Slavka Demuthova, Prof. Dr. Andrej Demuth\",\"doi\":\"10.33422/7th.rssconf.2023.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on the characteristics of the term of Beauty in the context of its opposite – Ugliness. In a natural language these two terms are considered to be counterparts, although several areas of research into aesthetics have suggested that they might actually overlap and may co-exist. The identification of the possible differences and similarities of the terms Beauty and Ugliness may contribute to a better understanding of Beauty. In order to define these terms, the study utilises the method of semantic differential and aims to establish which adjectives best describe the concepts of Beauty and Ugliness, based on an assessment through twenty-one bipolar adjectives grouped into the dimensions: activity, evaluation and potency. The main objective is to discover which adjectives differ in the evaluations of the terms of Beauty and Ugliness, and to what extent they differ. The research involved 1,991 subjects (53.1% of whom were female) in the age range 18 – 89 (M = 41.53 years; SD = 16.48). The term Beauty was most closely linked to adjectives such as pleasant, inviting and inspiring; Ugliness to unpleasant, repulsive and bad. In the analysis of the similarities and differences between the terms Beauty and Ugliness, a paired T-Test identified statistically significant differences in all the bipolar adjective pairs, with the exception of impulsive/judicious. The most significant differences were found in the adjective pairs of pleasant/unpleasant (t = 90.538), inviting/repulsive (t = 62.7640) and good/bad (t = 61.244) from the evaluation dimension. The method of semantic differential as well as the adjective pairs used provided a good degree of discrimination, meaning they have the potential to describe the meaning of the concepts through connotations within future studies that examine the similarities and differences between various expressions, or for the replication of this study in other linguistic or cultural regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of The 7th International Conference on Research in Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of The 7th International Conference on Research in Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33422/7th.rssconf.2023.07.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 7th International Conference on Research in Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/7th.rssconf.2023.07.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要研究“美”一词在其对立面“丑”语境中的特点。在自然语言中,这两个术语被认为是对等的,尽管一些美学研究领域表明它们实际上可能重叠并可能共存。识别美与丑这两个术语可能存在的异同有助于更好地理解美。为了定义这些术语,本研究利用语义差异的方法,旨在通过对21个双极性形容词的评估来确定哪些形容词最能描述美和丑的概念,这些形容词被分为活动、评价和效力三个维度。主要目的是发现哪些形容词在评价美和丑时存在差异,以及差异的程度。研究涉及1991名受试者(53.1%为女性),年龄在18 - 89岁之间(M = 41.53岁;Sd = 16.48)。“美”一词与令人愉快、诱人和鼓舞人心等形容词联系最为密切;丑到令人不愉快,令人厌恶和不好。在分析美与丑之间的异同时,配对t检验发现,除了冲动/明智之外,所有双相形容词对都有统计学上的显著差异。在评价维度上,“愉快/不愉快”(t = 90.538)、“邀请/排斥”(t = 62.7640)和“好/坏”(t = 61.244)三个形容词对的差异最大。语义差异的方法以及使用的形容词对提供了良好的区分程度,这意味着它们有可能在未来的研究中通过内涵来描述概念的含义,以检查各种表达之间的异同,或者在其他语言或文化区域复制本研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beauty in The Context of Ugliness – The Similarities and Differences of Their Semantic Differentials
This study focuses on the characteristics of the term of Beauty in the context of its opposite – Ugliness. In a natural language these two terms are considered to be counterparts, although several areas of research into aesthetics have suggested that they might actually overlap and may co-exist. The identification of the possible differences and similarities of the terms Beauty and Ugliness may contribute to a better understanding of Beauty. In order to define these terms, the study utilises the method of semantic differential and aims to establish which adjectives best describe the concepts of Beauty and Ugliness, based on an assessment through twenty-one bipolar adjectives grouped into the dimensions: activity, evaluation and potency. The main objective is to discover which adjectives differ in the evaluations of the terms of Beauty and Ugliness, and to what extent they differ. The research involved 1,991 subjects (53.1% of whom were female) in the age range 18 – 89 (M = 41.53 years; SD = 16.48). The term Beauty was most closely linked to adjectives such as pleasant, inviting and inspiring; Ugliness to unpleasant, repulsive and bad. In the analysis of the similarities and differences between the terms Beauty and Ugliness, a paired T-Test identified statistically significant differences in all the bipolar adjective pairs, with the exception of impulsive/judicious. The most significant differences were found in the adjective pairs of pleasant/unpleasant (t = 90.538), inviting/repulsive (t = 62.7640) and good/bad (t = 61.244) from the evaluation dimension. The method of semantic differential as well as the adjective pairs used provided a good degree of discrimination, meaning they have the potential to describe the meaning of the concepts through connotations within future studies that examine the similarities and differences between various expressions, or for the replication of this study in other linguistic or cultural regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Challenges and Suggestions of Group-Based Perpetrator Programs Based on Supervisions Beauty in The Context of Ugliness – The Similarities and Differences of Their Semantic Differentials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1