韩国基于MELD评分的肝脏分配系统对活体肝移植患者移植前MELD评分没有影响

Sang Hoon Kim, Shin Hwang, C. Ahn, D. Moon, T. Ha, G. Song, D. Jung, G. Park, Ki‐Hun Kim, Y. Yoon, Woo-Hyoung Kang, H. Cho, Minjae Kim, B. Na, Sung-Min Kim, Geunhyeok Yang, Sung‐Gyu Lee
{"title":"韩国基于MELD评分的肝脏分配系统对活体肝移植患者移植前MELD评分没有影响","authors":"Sang Hoon Kim, Shin Hwang, C. Ahn, D. Moon, T. Ha, G. Song, D. Jung, G. Park, Ki‐Hun Kim, Y. Yoon, Woo-Hyoung Kang, H. Cho, Minjae Kim, B. Na, Sung-Min Kim, Geunhyeok Yang, Sung‐Gyu Lee","doi":"10.52604/ALT.11.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score-based allocation system was started in 2016 in Korea. This study aimed to analyze the profiles of adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the pre- and post-MELD eras. Methods: This study was a retrospective double-arm analysis using a single-institution LDLT cohort. We compared the LDLT re-cipient profiles by focusing on pretransplant MELD score for 4 years before and after the introduction of the MELD score-based allocation system. Patients without and with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were categorized as groups A and B in the pre-MELD era and groups C and D in the post-MELD era, respectively. Results: The number of patients in groups A, B, C and D was 615, 599, 704, and 713, respectively; and their MELD scores were 19.0±9.4, 11.2±5.6, 17.9±8.5, and 11.6±5.7, respectively. Clinical parameters of liver cirrhosis indicate that group A had worse general conditions than group C; and groups B and D had similar general conditions. The comparative analysis between groups A and C revealed the mean and median MELD scores as 19.0±9.4 and 17.9±8.5 (P=0.009), and 16 and 15 (P=0.077), respectively. The comparative analysis","PeriodicalId":383785,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Liver Transplantation","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Absence of influence of the Korean MELD score-based liver allocation system on pretransplant MELD score in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation\",\"authors\":\"Sang Hoon Kim, Shin Hwang, C. Ahn, D. Moon, T. Ha, G. Song, D. Jung, G. Park, Ki‐Hun Kim, Y. Yoon, Woo-Hyoung Kang, H. Cho, Minjae Kim, B. Na, Sung-Min Kim, Geunhyeok Yang, Sung‐Gyu Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.52604/ALT.11.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score-based allocation system was started in 2016 in Korea. This study aimed to analyze the profiles of adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the pre- and post-MELD eras. Methods: This study was a retrospective double-arm analysis using a single-institution LDLT cohort. We compared the LDLT re-cipient profiles by focusing on pretransplant MELD score for 4 years before and after the introduction of the MELD score-based allocation system. Patients without and with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were categorized as groups A and B in the pre-MELD era and groups C and D in the post-MELD era, respectively. Results: The number of patients in groups A, B, C and D was 615, 599, 704, and 713, respectively; and their MELD scores were 19.0±9.4, 11.2±5.6, 17.9±8.5, and 11.6±5.7, respectively. Clinical parameters of liver cirrhosis indicate that group A had worse general conditions than group C; and groups B and D had similar general conditions. The comparative analysis between groups A and C revealed the mean and median MELD scores as 19.0±9.4 and 17.9±8.5 (P=0.009), and 16 and 15 (P=0.077), respectively. The comparative analysis\",\"PeriodicalId\":383785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Liver Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Liver Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52604/ALT.11.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52604/ALT.11.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分分配系统于2016年在韩国启动。本研究旨在分析meld前后接受活体供肝移植(LDLT)的成年患者的概况。方法:本研究采用单机构LDLT队列进行回顾性双组分析。我们通过引入基于MELD评分的分配系统前后4年的移植前MELD评分来比较LDLT受者的概况。无肝细胞癌(HCC)患者在meld前分为A组和B组,在meld后分为C组和D组。结果:A、B、C、D组患者数分别为615例、599例、704例、713例;MELD评分分别为19.0±9.4、11.2±5.6、17.9±8.5、11.6±5.7分。肝硬化临床参数显示,A组一般情况较C组差;B组和D组一般情况相似。A组与C组比较,MELD评分的平均值为19.0±9.4分,中位数为17.9±8.5分(P=0.009),中位数为16分,中位数为15分(P=0.077)。对比分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Absence of influence of the Korean MELD score-based liver allocation system on pretransplant MELD score in patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation
Background: Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score-based allocation system was started in 2016 in Korea. This study aimed to analyze the profiles of adult patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) in the pre- and post-MELD eras. Methods: This study was a retrospective double-arm analysis using a single-institution LDLT cohort. We compared the LDLT re-cipient profiles by focusing on pretransplant MELD score for 4 years before and after the introduction of the MELD score-based allocation system. Patients without and with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were categorized as groups A and B in the pre-MELD era and groups C and D in the post-MELD era, respectively. Results: The number of patients in groups A, B, C and D was 615, 599, 704, and 713, respectively; and their MELD scores were 19.0±9.4, 11.2±5.6, 17.9±8.5, and 11.6±5.7, respectively. Clinical parameters of liver cirrhosis indicate that group A had worse general conditions than group C; and groups B and D had similar general conditions. The comparative analysis between groups A and C revealed the mean and median MELD scores as 19.0±9.4 and 17.9±8.5 (P=0.009), and 16 and 15 (P=0.077), respectively. The comparative analysis
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Surveillance and management of de novo malignancy after liver transplantation Carbapenem-resistant gram-negative rod bacteremia in the early postoperative period following liver transplantation How to prevent chronic kidney disease after liver transplantation? Clinical impact and risk factors for cytomegalovirus infection in deceased donor liver transplantation without prophylaxis: Single center experience Analyzing bench-surgery time: A comparative study of pure laparoscopic and open left hepatectomy including the middle hepatic vein in living liver donors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1