当代撒哈拉以南非洲的资本主义幻觉:以冈比亚为例

A. Sallah, Colin Williams
{"title":"当代撒哈拉以南非洲的资本主义幻觉:以冈比亚为例","authors":"A. Sallah, Colin Williams","doi":"10.1108/14636681111138767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – This paper aims to evaluate critically the meta-narrative that there is no alternative to capitalism. Building upon an emerging body of post-structuralist thought that has begun deconstructing this discourse in relation to western economies and post-Soviet societies, this paper further extends this critique to Sub-Saharan Africa by investigating the degree to which people in the Gambia rely on the capitalist market economy for their livelihood. Reporting the results of 80 household face-to-face interviews (involving over 500 people), the finding is that only a small minority of households in contemporary Gambian society rely on the formal market economy alone to secure their livelihood and that the vast majority depend on a plurality of market and non-market economic practices. The outcome is a call to re-think the lived practices of economic transition in Sub-Saharan Africa in general and the Gambia in particular, so as to open up the feasibility of, and possibilities for, alternative economic futures beyond capitalist hegemony.Design/methodology/approach – Some 80 households (involving over 500 people) were interviewed face-to-face on their livelihood coping strategies.Findings – Reporting the results of 80 household face-to-face interviews (involving over 500 people), the finding is that only a small minority of households in contemporary Gambian society rely on the formal market economy alone to secure their livelihood and that the vast majority depend on a plurality of market and non-market economic practices.Practical implications – The outcome is a call to re-think the lived practices of economic transition in Sub-Saharan Africa in general and the Gambia in particular, so as to open up the feasibility of, and possibilities for, alternative economic futures beyond capitalist hegemony.Originality/value – This research gives us an empirical understanding of the implications of lived experiences of people’s day-to-day livelihood coping strategies, which refutes the capitalist’s thesis and calls of a re-think on economic and sustainable development policies and strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa.","PeriodicalId":378721,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","volume":"183 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Illusion of Capitalism in Contemporary Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study of the Gambia\",\"authors\":\"A. Sallah, Colin Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/14636681111138767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose – This paper aims to evaluate critically the meta-narrative that there is no alternative to capitalism. Building upon an emerging body of post-structuralist thought that has begun deconstructing this discourse in relation to western economies and post-Soviet societies, this paper further extends this critique to Sub-Saharan Africa by investigating the degree to which people in the Gambia rely on the capitalist market economy for their livelihood. Reporting the results of 80 household face-to-face interviews (involving over 500 people), the finding is that only a small minority of households in contemporary Gambian society rely on the formal market economy alone to secure their livelihood and that the vast majority depend on a plurality of market and non-market economic practices. The outcome is a call to re-think the lived practices of economic transition in Sub-Saharan Africa in general and the Gambia in particular, so as to open up the feasibility of, and possibilities for, alternative economic futures beyond capitalist hegemony.Design/methodology/approach – Some 80 households (involving over 500 people) were interviewed face-to-face on their livelihood coping strategies.Findings – Reporting the results of 80 household face-to-face interviews (involving over 500 people), the finding is that only a small minority of households in contemporary Gambian society rely on the formal market economy alone to secure their livelihood and that the vast majority depend on a plurality of market and non-market economic practices.Practical implications – The outcome is a call to re-think the lived practices of economic transition in Sub-Saharan Africa in general and the Gambia in particular, so as to open up the feasibility of, and possibilities for, alternative economic futures beyond capitalist hegemony.Originality/value – This research gives us an empirical understanding of the implications of lived experiences of people’s day-to-day livelihood coping strategies, which refutes the capitalist’s thesis and calls of a re-think on economic and sustainable development policies and strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"183 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681111138767\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Comparative Capitalism (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/14636681111138767","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的-本文旨在批判性地评估资本主义无可替代的元叙事。建立在一个新兴的后结构主义思想的基础上,该思想已经开始解构与西方经济和后苏联社会相关的话语,本文通过调查冈比亚人民依赖资本主义市场经济维持生计的程度,将这种批评进一步扩展到撒哈拉以南非洲。报告了80个家庭面对面访谈的结果(涉及500多人),结果发现,在当代冈比亚社会中,只有少数家庭仅依靠正式的市场经济来确保生计,而绝大多数家庭依靠多种市场和非市场经济做法。其结果是呼吁重新思考撒哈拉以南非洲,特别是冈比亚的经济转型的生活实践,以便开辟超越资本主义霸权的替代经济未来的可行性和可能性。设计/方法/方法-约80户住户(涉及超过500人)接受面对面访谈,了解他们应付生计的策略。调查结果-报告了80个家庭面对面访谈的结果(涉及500多人),调查结果表明,当代冈比亚社会中只有少数家庭仅依靠正式的市场经济来确保生计,而绝大多数家庭依赖于多种市场和非市场经济实践。实际影响-结果是呼吁重新思考撒哈拉以南非洲,特别是冈比亚的经济转型的生活实践,以便开辟可行性和可能性,超越资本主义霸权的替代经济未来。原创性/价值-这项研究为我们提供了对人们日常生活应对策略的生活经验含义的实证理解,反驳了资本家的论点,并呼吁重新思考撒哈拉以南非洲的经济和可持续发展政策和战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Illusion of Capitalism in Contemporary Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Study of the Gambia
Purpose – This paper aims to evaluate critically the meta-narrative that there is no alternative to capitalism. Building upon an emerging body of post-structuralist thought that has begun deconstructing this discourse in relation to western economies and post-Soviet societies, this paper further extends this critique to Sub-Saharan Africa by investigating the degree to which people in the Gambia rely on the capitalist market economy for their livelihood. Reporting the results of 80 household face-to-face interviews (involving over 500 people), the finding is that only a small minority of households in contemporary Gambian society rely on the formal market economy alone to secure their livelihood and that the vast majority depend on a plurality of market and non-market economic practices. The outcome is a call to re-think the lived practices of economic transition in Sub-Saharan Africa in general and the Gambia in particular, so as to open up the feasibility of, and possibilities for, alternative economic futures beyond capitalist hegemony.Design/methodology/approach – Some 80 households (involving over 500 people) were interviewed face-to-face on their livelihood coping strategies.Findings – Reporting the results of 80 household face-to-face interviews (involving over 500 people), the finding is that only a small minority of households in contemporary Gambian society rely on the formal market economy alone to secure their livelihood and that the vast majority depend on a plurality of market and non-market economic practices.Practical implications – The outcome is a call to re-think the lived practices of economic transition in Sub-Saharan Africa in general and the Gambia in particular, so as to open up the feasibility of, and possibilities for, alternative economic futures beyond capitalist hegemony.Originality/value – This research gives us an empirical understanding of the implications of lived experiences of people’s day-to-day livelihood coping strategies, which refutes the capitalist’s thesis and calls of a re-think on economic and sustainable development policies and strategies in Sub-Saharan Africa.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Income and Consumption over the Business Cycle: Evidence from Matched Administrative Data Unemployment Hysteresis in Asian Countries: Findings Based on Flexible Fourier Form and Structural Break Unit Root Tests How Americans Respond to Idiosyncratic and Exogenous Changes in Household Wealth and Unearned Income Do Mutual Funds Represent Individual Investors? Global or Country Business Cycles: Developed versus Developing Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1