肝素酶血栓造影能预测术后出血吗?

P. C. Mashburn, J. Ecklund, J. Riley
{"title":"肝素酶血栓造影能预测术后出血吗?","authors":"P. C. Mashburn, J. Ecklund, J. Riley","doi":"10.1051/ject/1996284185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Postoperative hemorrhage is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The thrombelastograph (TEG) is a viscoelastic whole blood test that measures clot dynamics from clot formation through clot lysis. Previous studies have shown that post-bypass TEGs are accurate predictors of postoperative bleeding.\nTEGs from heparinized blood reversed with heparinase may be employed during CPB to evaluate coagulation. CPB heparinase TEGs may allow for earlier recognition of patients who may bleed after bypass. Earlier TEG analysis would allow targeting of specific therapies to begin before the patient bleeds excessively. Fifty-four heparinase TEGs during warming and fifty-four native TEGs post-protamine administration were collected. Parameters evaluated were R, K, alpha angle, MA, MA60, coagulation index, activated clotting time. hematocrit, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, fibrinogen concentration, platelet count, blood loss during and after CPB, and blood and blood product administration. Coagulation indexes for CPB heparinase TEGs that were less than -2 or heparinase TEGs that were fibrinolytic were 87% accurate in predicting patients with excessive intraoperative blood loss, but were not predictive of blood product administration. The sensitivity was 12.5% and the specificity was I 00% in predicting excessive intraoperative bleeding. Post-protamine coagulation index inversely correlated with intraoperative red blood cell administration (r=-0.403, p<0.05), but was not predictive. Patients with fibrinolytic TEGs required blood products to compensate for expected blood loss associated with the fibrinolytic state. Simultaneous routine coagulation tests did not correlate significantly with blood loss or blood product administration, nor were they predictive. The findings of this study suggest that the presence of fibrinolysis in either a heparinase TEG on bypass or a post-protamine TEG is the most important predictor of blood and blood product administration. But, since only 20% of the patients in the study exhibited fibrinolytic TEGs, a study that included a much larger sample of patients would need to be done to confirm this finding.","PeriodicalId":309024,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Heparinase Thrombelastographs Predict Postoperative Bleeding?\",\"authors\":\"P. C. Mashburn, J. Ecklund, J. Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ject/1996284185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Postoperative hemorrhage is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The thrombelastograph (TEG) is a viscoelastic whole blood test that measures clot dynamics from clot formation through clot lysis. Previous studies have shown that post-bypass TEGs are accurate predictors of postoperative bleeding.\\nTEGs from heparinized blood reversed with heparinase may be employed during CPB to evaluate coagulation. CPB heparinase TEGs may allow for earlier recognition of patients who may bleed after bypass. Earlier TEG analysis would allow targeting of specific therapies to begin before the patient bleeds excessively. Fifty-four heparinase TEGs during warming and fifty-four native TEGs post-protamine administration were collected. Parameters evaluated were R, K, alpha angle, MA, MA60, coagulation index, activated clotting time. hematocrit, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, fibrinogen concentration, platelet count, blood loss during and after CPB, and blood and blood product administration. Coagulation indexes for CPB heparinase TEGs that were less than -2 or heparinase TEGs that were fibrinolytic were 87% accurate in predicting patients with excessive intraoperative blood loss, but were not predictive of blood product administration. The sensitivity was 12.5% and the specificity was I 00% in predicting excessive intraoperative bleeding. Post-protamine coagulation index inversely correlated with intraoperative red blood cell administration (r=-0.403, p<0.05), but was not predictive. Patients with fibrinolytic TEGs required blood products to compensate for expected blood loss associated with the fibrinolytic state. Simultaneous routine coagulation tests did not correlate significantly with blood loss or blood product administration, nor were they predictive. The findings of this study suggest that the presence of fibrinolysis in either a heparinase TEG on bypass or a post-protamine TEG is the most important predictor of blood and blood product administration. But, since only 20% of the patients in the study exhibited fibrinolytic TEGs, a study that included a much larger sample of patients would need to be done to confirm this finding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/1996284185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/1996284185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

术后出血是体外循环(CPB)患者发病和死亡的主要原因。血栓描记仪(TEG)是一种粘弹性全血测试,测量从凝块形成到凝块溶解的凝块动力学。先前的研究表明,旁路手术后的teg是术后出血的准确预测指标。经肝素酶逆转的肝素化血的teg可用于CPB期间评估凝血。CPB肝素酶teg可以早期识别旁路术后可能出血的患者。早期的TEG分析将允许在患者过度出血之前开始针对特定的治疗。在加热过程中收集54个肝素酶teg,在鱼精蛋白处理后收集54个天然teg。评价指标为R、K、α角、MA、MA60、凝血指数、活化凝血时间。红细胞压积,凝血酶原时间,部分凝血活酶时间,凝血酶时间,纤维蛋白原浓度,血小板计数,CPB期间和之后的失血,以及血液和血液制品给药。凝血指标中小于-2的CPB肝素酶teg或纤溶性肝素酶teg预测术中出血量过高的准确率为87%,但不能预测血液制品给药情况。预测术中过量出血的敏感性为12.5%,特异性为1.00%。鱼精蛋白后凝血指数与术中红细胞给药呈负相关(r=-0.403, p<0.05),但无预测意义。纤溶性teg患者需要血液制品来补偿与纤溶状态相关的预期失血。同时进行常规凝血试验与失血或血液制品给药没有显著相关性,也不能预测。本研究的结果表明,肝素酶TEG绕道或鱼精蛋白后TEG中纤溶的存在是血液和血液制品给药的最重要的预测指标。但是,由于研究中只有20%的患者表现出纤维蛋白溶解性teg,因此需要进行一项包括更大患者样本的研究来证实这一发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do Heparinase Thrombelastographs Predict Postoperative Bleeding?
Postoperative hemorrhage is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients who undergo cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The thrombelastograph (TEG) is a viscoelastic whole blood test that measures clot dynamics from clot formation through clot lysis. Previous studies have shown that post-bypass TEGs are accurate predictors of postoperative bleeding. TEGs from heparinized blood reversed with heparinase may be employed during CPB to evaluate coagulation. CPB heparinase TEGs may allow for earlier recognition of patients who may bleed after bypass. Earlier TEG analysis would allow targeting of specific therapies to begin before the patient bleeds excessively. Fifty-four heparinase TEGs during warming and fifty-four native TEGs post-protamine administration were collected. Parameters evaluated were R, K, alpha angle, MA, MA60, coagulation index, activated clotting time. hematocrit, prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, fibrinogen concentration, platelet count, blood loss during and after CPB, and blood and blood product administration. Coagulation indexes for CPB heparinase TEGs that were less than -2 or heparinase TEGs that were fibrinolytic were 87% accurate in predicting patients with excessive intraoperative blood loss, but were not predictive of blood product administration. The sensitivity was 12.5% and the specificity was I 00% in predicting excessive intraoperative bleeding. Post-protamine coagulation index inversely correlated with intraoperative red blood cell administration (r=-0.403, p<0.05), but was not predictive. Patients with fibrinolytic TEGs required blood products to compensate for expected blood loss associated with the fibrinolytic state. Simultaneous routine coagulation tests did not correlate significantly with blood loss or blood product administration, nor were they predictive. The findings of this study suggest that the presence of fibrinolysis in either a heparinase TEG on bypass or a post-protamine TEG is the most important predictor of blood and blood product administration. But, since only 20% of the patients in the study exhibited fibrinolytic TEGs, a study that included a much larger sample of patients would need to be done to confirm this finding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Standardized Therapies after ECMO Program (STEP); A Novel Approach to Pediatric post-ECMO Care Traditional vs. modified Ringer lactate-based del Nido cardioplegia impacts on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: results from a clinical trial Comparison of routine del Nido cardioplegia vs two types of modified del Nido cardioplegias for myocardial protection among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgeries: a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Adapting and Applying Student-centered Learning in a Perfusion Clinical Rotation Adapting and Applying Student-centered Learning in a Perfusion Clinical Rotation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1