作为催化剂的先进提示:在胃肠道癌症管理中增强大型语言模型的能力

J. Yuan, Peng Bao, Zi Chen, Mingze Yuan, Jie Zhao, Jiahua Pan, Yi Xie, Yanshuo Cao, Yakun Wang, Zhenghang Wang, Zhihao Lu, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Lei Ma, Yang Chen, Li Zhang, Lin Shen, Bin Dong
{"title":"作为催化剂的先进提示:在胃肠道癌症管理中增强大型语言模型的能力","authors":"J. Yuan, Peng Bao, Zi Chen, Mingze Yuan, Jie Zhao, Jiahua Pan, Yi Xie, Yanshuo Cao, Yakun Wang, Zhenghang Wang, Zhihao Lu, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Lei Ma, Yang Chen, Li Zhang, Lin Shen, Bin Dong","doi":"10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large Language Models' (LLMs) performance in healthcare can be significantly impacted by prompt engineering. However, the area of study remains relatively uncharted in gastrointestinal oncology until now. Our research delves into this unexplored territory, investigating the efficacy of varied prompting strategies, including simple prompts, templated prompts, in-context learning (ICL), and multi-round iterative questioning, for optimizing the performance of LLMs within a medical setting. We develop a comprehensive evaluation system to assess the performance of LLMs across multiple dimensions. This robust evaluation system ensures a thorough assessment of the LLMs' capabilities in the field of medicine. Our findings suggest a positive relationship between the comprehensiveness of the prompts and the LLMs' performance. Notably, the multi-round strategy, which is characterized by iterative question-and-answer rounds, consistently yields the best results. ICL, a strategy that capitalizes on interrelated contextual learning, also displays significant promise, surpassing the outcomes achieved with simpler prompts. The research underscores the potential of advanced prompt engineering and iterative learning approaches for boosting the applicability of LLMs in healthcare. We recommend that additional research be conducted to refine these strategies and investigate their potential integration, to truly harness the full potential of LLMs in medical applications.\n","PeriodicalId":423184,"journal":{"name":"The Innovation Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advanced prompting as a catalyst: Empowering large language models in the management of gastrointestinal cancers\",\"authors\":\"J. Yuan, Peng Bao, Zi Chen, Mingze Yuan, Jie Zhao, Jiahua Pan, Yi Xie, Yanshuo Cao, Yakun Wang, Zhenghang Wang, Zhihao Lu, Xiaotian Zhang, Jian Li, Lei Ma, Yang Chen, Li Zhang, Lin Shen, Bin Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large Language Models' (LLMs) performance in healthcare can be significantly impacted by prompt engineering. However, the area of study remains relatively uncharted in gastrointestinal oncology until now. Our research delves into this unexplored territory, investigating the efficacy of varied prompting strategies, including simple prompts, templated prompts, in-context learning (ICL), and multi-round iterative questioning, for optimizing the performance of LLMs within a medical setting. We develop a comprehensive evaluation system to assess the performance of LLMs across multiple dimensions. This robust evaluation system ensures a thorough assessment of the LLMs' capabilities in the field of medicine. Our findings suggest a positive relationship between the comprehensiveness of the prompts and the LLMs' performance. Notably, the multi-round strategy, which is characterized by iterative question-and-answer rounds, consistently yields the best results. ICL, a strategy that capitalizes on interrelated contextual learning, also displays significant promise, surpassing the outcomes achieved with simpler prompts. The research underscores the potential of advanced prompt engineering and iterative learning approaches for boosting the applicability of LLMs in healthcare. We recommend that additional research be conducted to refine these strategies and investigate their potential integration, to truly harness the full potential of LLMs in medical applications.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":423184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Innovation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Innovation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Innovation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-med.2023.100019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

大型语言模型(llm)在医疗保健领域的性能会受到即时工程的显著影响。然而,到目前为止,胃肠道肿瘤学的研究领域仍然相对未知。我们的研究深入了这一未开发的领域,调查了各种提示策略的有效性,包括简单提示、模板提示、上下文学习(ICL)和多轮迭代提问,以优化llm在医疗环境中的性能。我们开发了一个全面的评估系统,从多个维度评估法学硕士的表现。这个强大的评估系统确保了法学硕士在医学领域的能力的全面评估。我们的研究结果表明,提示的全面性与法学硕士的表现之间存在正相关关系。值得注意的是,以反复问答为特征的多轮策略始终产生最佳结果。ICL是一种利用相互关联的上下文学习的策略,也显示出巨大的前景,超过了使用更简单的提示所取得的结果。该研究强调了先进的快速工程和迭代学习方法的潜力,以提高法学硕士在医疗保健领域的适用性。我们建议进行更多的研究来完善这些策略,并调查它们的潜在整合,以真正利用法学硕士在医学应用中的全部潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advanced prompting as a catalyst: Empowering large language models in the management of gastrointestinal cancers
Large Language Models' (LLMs) performance in healthcare can be significantly impacted by prompt engineering. However, the area of study remains relatively uncharted in gastrointestinal oncology until now. Our research delves into this unexplored territory, investigating the efficacy of varied prompting strategies, including simple prompts, templated prompts, in-context learning (ICL), and multi-round iterative questioning, for optimizing the performance of LLMs within a medical setting. We develop a comprehensive evaluation system to assess the performance of LLMs across multiple dimensions. This robust evaluation system ensures a thorough assessment of the LLMs' capabilities in the field of medicine. Our findings suggest a positive relationship between the comprehensiveness of the prompts and the LLMs' performance. Notably, the multi-round strategy, which is characterized by iterative question-and-answer rounds, consistently yields the best results. ICL, a strategy that capitalizes on interrelated contextual learning, also displays significant promise, surpassing the outcomes achieved with simpler prompts. The research underscores the potential of advanced prompt engineering and iterative learning approaches for boosting the applicability of LLMs in healthcare. We recommend that additional research be conducted to refine these strategies and investigate their potential integration, to truly harness the full potential of LLMs in medical applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A new perspective in the research of antibody drug conjugate CDK4/6 inhibition: What��s happening beyond CDK4/6 inhibition may also matter Young adults' blood selenium and lung function in Shandong Province, China: A prospective cohort study Advancing the battle against Alzheimer's Disease: a focus on targeting tau pathology by antisense oligonucleotide Basiliximab is the potential solution for severe liver chronic GVHD: A prospective pilot study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1