HA(伊拉克)和其他诉SSHD [2022] UKSC 22

Harriet Wakeman
{"title":"HA(伊拉克)和其他诉SSHD [2022] UKSC 22","authors":"Harriet Wakeman","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2115834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. In HA (Iraq) and others v SSHD, the Supreme Court considered three conjoined appeals by HA, RA and AA. The appeals concerned the statutory regime governing the deportation of foreign criminals under s 117C of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (‘the 2002 Act’). The judgment sets out important guidance in relation to the additional art 8 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) considerations in cases involving the deportation of foreign criminals, and in particular in relation to the ‘unduly harsh’ test within s 117C(5) and the ‘very compelling circumstances’ test within s 117C(6) of the 2002 Act. This case note focuses on the key principles set out by the Supreme Court, rather than the outcome of the individual cases of HA, RA and AA, which necessarily turn on their own facts.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HA (Iraq) and Others v SSHD [2022] UKSC 22\",\"authors\":\"Harriet Wakeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2115834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. In HA (Iraq) and others v SSHD, the Supreme Court considered three conjoined appeals by HA, RA and AA. The appeals concerned the statutory regime governing the deportation of foreign criminals under s 117C of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (‘the 2002 Act’). The judgment sets out important guidance in relation to the additional art 8 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) considerations in cases involving the deportation of foreign criminals, and in particular in relation to the ‘unduly harsh’ test within s 117C(5) and the ‘very compelling circumstances’ test within s 117C(6) of the 2002 Act. This case note focuses on the key principles set out by the Supreme Court, rather than the outcome of the individual cases of HA, RA and AA, which necessarily turn on their own facts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2115834\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2115834","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 在医管局(伊拉克)和其他人诉SSHD案中,最高法院审理了医管局、RA和AA的三项联合上诉。上诉涉及根据《2002年国籍、移民和庇护法》(“2002年法”)第117C条规定驱逐外国罪犯的法定制度。在涉及驱逐外国罪犯的案件中,该判决就《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR)第8条的附加考虑提供了重要指导,特别是关于2002年法案第117C(5)条中的“过分苛刻”测试和第117C(6)条中的“非常令人信服的情况”测试。本案件说明的重点是最高法院制定的主要原则,而不是医管局、房屋管理局和机管局的个别案件的结果,因为这些案件必然取决于各自的事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HA (Iraq) and Others v SSHD [2022] UKSC 22
1. In HA (Iraq) and others v SSHD, the Supreme Court considered three conjoined appeals by HA, RA and AA. The appeals concerned the statutory regime governing the deportation of foreign criminals under s 117C of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (‘the 2002 Act’). The judgment sets out important guidance in relation to the additional art 8 European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) considerations in cases involving the deportation of foreign criminals, and in particular in relation to the ‘unduly harsh’ test within s 117C(5) and the ‘very compelling circumstances’ test within s 117C(6) of the 2002 Act. This case note focuses on the key principles set out by the Supreme Court, rather than the outcome of the individual cases of HA, RA and AA, which necessarily turn on their own facts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1