国有制与盈余管理:来自中国股权分置改革的证据

Ja Ryong Kim
{"title":"国有制与盈余管理:来自中国股权分置改革的证据","authors":"Ja Ryong Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3298807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies on state ownership often involve endogeneity issues, such as a lack of variation in state ownership status and vastly different firm characteristics between state-owned enterprises and private firms. By using an exogenous regulatory reform, the split share structure reform in China, this paper examines the effect of state ownership through privatization, which mitigates the impact of endogeneity issues. The paper finds that privatized firms engaged more in earnings management, both accruals and real earnings management, after privatization. The results of the robustness test explain that this is partially due to external financing needs, after the loss of the benefits provided to state-owned enterprises. The result is consistent when a matched sample based on the propensity score matching is used. The paper contributes to the literature by reducing the endogeneity issues commonly present in state ownership studies and provides evidence on the impact of the loss of state ownership in China, where the capital market is considered less developed.","PeriodicalId":343804,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Government Owned Firms (Topic)","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State Ownership and Earnings Management: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China\",\"authors\":\"Ja Ryong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3298807\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies on state ownership often involve endogeneity issues, such as a lack of variation in state ownership status and vastly different firm characteristics between state-owned enterprises and private firms. By using an exogenous regulatory reform, the split share structure reform in China, this paper examines the effect of state ownership through privatization, which mitigates the impact of endogeneity issues. The paper finds that privatized firms engaged more in earnings management, both accruals and real earnings management, after privatization. The results of the robustness test explain that this is partially due to external financing needs, after the loss of the benefits provided to state-owned enterprises. The result is consistent when a matched sample based on the propensity score matching is used. The paper contributes to the literature by reducing the endogeneity issues commonly present in state ownership studies and provides evidence on the impact of the loss of state ownership in China, where the capital market is considered less developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Government Owned Firms (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"91 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Government Owned Firms (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3298807\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Government Owned Firms (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3298807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对国有制的研究往往涉及内生性问题,例如国有制地位缺乏变化,国有企业和私营企业之间的企业特征差异很大。本文以外生监管改革——中国股权分置改革为例,考察了国有制通过私有化缓解内生性问题影响的效果。研究发现,私有化后的企业在应计盈余和实际盈余管理两方面的盈余管理都有所增加。稳健性检验的结果解释说,这部分是由于外部融资需求,在失去提供给国有企业的利益之后。当使用基于倾向分数匹配的匹配样本时,结果是一致的。本文通过减少国有制研究中普遍存在的内生性问题,为文献做出了贡献,并为资本市场被认为欠发达的中国失去国有制的影响提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State Ownership and Earnings Management: Evidence from the Split Share Structure Reform in China
Studies on state ownership often involve endogeneity issues, such as a lack of variation in state ownership status and vastly different firm characteristics between state-owned enterprises and private firms. By using an exogenous regulatory reform, the split share structure reform in China, this paper examines the effect of state ownership through privatization, which mitigates the impact of endogeneity issues. The paper finds that privatized firms engaged more in earnings management, both accruals and real earnings management, after privatization. The results of the robustness test explain that this is partially due to external financing needs, after the loss of the benefits provided to state-owned enterprises. The result is consistent when a matched sample based on the propensity score matching is used. The paper contributes to the literature by reducing the endogeneity issues commonly present in state ownership studies and provides evidence on the impact of the loss of state ownership in China, where the capital market is considered less developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Limits of Liberalization: WTO Entry and Chinese State-Owned Firms Monitoring the Efficiency of BUMN Banks in Indonesia: Comparison with BUMS Banks The Role of Informal Institutions in the Enforcement of Rules and How to Improve Corporate and Public Governance in Brazil: Studies Based on a Set of Corporate Governance Cases Involving State-Owned Companies From Soviet State Enterprises to Russian Unitary Enterprises Rebalancing in China: A Taxation Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1