司法与土著土地划界:伯南布哥案

F. Maia, G. D. S. G. Júnior
{"title":"司法与土著土地划界:伯南布哥案","authors":"F. Maia, G. D. S. G. Júnior","doi":"10.18593/EJJL.12014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The article deals with the conflicts involving indigenous lands in Pernambuco by the Judiciary. The analysis was made from the decisions in Pernambuco and dealing with conflict processes of indigenous lands. The study employs the concepts of the right of access to land and the placement of judges in resolving conflicts involving indigenous lands. The performance of jurisdiction on matters of indigenous lands is analyzed, and the possible scenarios of these conflicts in the State are investigated. As instrument of research, books and articles of environmental law and rural sociology, on environmental conflicts over land ownership, and the judgments on the conflicts for the right to land in the indigenous communities were used. It argues that the Judiciary acts inconsistent in applying the standard environmental material in conflicts involving indigenous lands. Therefore, indigenous peoples do not find in the Judiciary a favorable field for defence of their rights to the land. Keywords : Judicial review. Land rights. Indigenous. Conflict.","PeriodicalId":206661,"journal":{"name":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O Judiciário e a demarcação de terras indígenas: o caso de Pernambuco\",\"authors\":\"F. Maia, G. D. S. G. Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.18593/EJJL.12014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The article deals with the conflicts involving indigenous lands in Pernambuco by the Judiciary. The analysis was made from the decisions in Pernambuco and dealing with conflict processes of indigenous lands. The study employs the concepts of the right of access to land and the placement of judges in resolving conflicts involving indigenous lands. The performance of jurisdiction on matters of indigenous lands is analyzed, and the possible scenarios of these conflicts in the State are investigated. As instrument of research, books and articles of environmental law and rural sociology, on environmental conflicts over land ownership, and the judgments on the conflicts for the right to land in the indigenous communities were used. It argues that the Judiciary acts inconsistent in applying the standard environmental material in conflicts involving indigenous lands. Therefore, indigenous peoples do not find in the Judiciary a favorable field for defence of their rights to the land. Keywords : Judicial review. Land rights. Indigenous. Conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18593/EJJL.12014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18593/EJJL.12014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本文论述了伯南布哥州司法部门涉及土著土地的冲突。分析是从伯南布哥的决定和处理土著土地的冲突过程中做出的。这项研究采用了获得土地的权利和安排法官解决涉及土著土地的冲突的概念。分析了对土著土地问题行使管辖权的情况,并调查了国内这些冲突的可能情况。作为研究工具,使用了环境法和农村社会学的书籍和文章,关于土地所有权的环境冲突,以及关于土著社区土地权利冲突的判断。它认为,司法机构在涉及土著土地的冲突中适用标准环境材料的行为不一致。因此,土著人民在司法机构中找不到捍卫其土地权利的有利场所。关键词:司法审查;土地权利。土著。冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O Judiciário e a demarcação de terras indígenas: o caso de Pernambuco
Abstract The article deals with the conflicts involving indigenous lands in Pernambuco by the Judiciary. The analysis was made from the decisions in Pernambuco and dealing with conflict processes of indigenous lands. The study employs the concepts of the right of access to land and the placement of judges in resolving conflicts involving indigenous lands. The performance of jurisdiction on matters of indigenous lands is analyzed, and the possible scenarios of these conflicts in the State are investigated. As instrument of research, books and articles of environmental law and rural sociology, on environmental conflicts over land ownership, and the judgments on the conflicts for the right to land in the indigenous communities were used. It argues that the Judiciary acts inconsistent in applying the standard environmental material in conflicts involving indigenous lands. Therefore, indigenous peoples do not find in the Judiciary a favorable field for defence of their rights to the land. Keywords : Judicial review. Land rights. Indigenous. Conflict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EDITORAÇÃO, CULTURA CIENTÍFICA NO BRASIL E OS 20 ANOS DA EJJL O direito fundamental a tratamento não discriminatório como limite para a extinção do contrato de emprego da pessoa com doença geradora de estigma ou preconceito Cuidado e direitos fundamentais: o caso do habeas corpus coletivo para pais e responsáveis por crianças e pessoas com deficiência Los derechos de la naturaleza: un paso adelante, tres atrás O debate entre Mart Suzi (IBF) e Robert Alexy (WF), organizado na obra proporcionalidade e internet
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1