LDL分子大小与冠状动脉疾病的危险因素

Acta medica Hungarica Pub Date : 1992-01-01
L Kozma, J Fodor, A Chockalingam, B Sussex
{"title":"LDL分子大小与冠状动脉疾病的危险因素","authors":"L Kozma,&nbsp;J Fodor,&nbsp;A Chockalingam,&nbsp;B Sussex","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sera of 65 fasting human subjects--32 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) aged 42-80 years and 33 healthy individuals--were tested for determination of nine lipid-related laboratory parameters, including protein-enriched LDL (low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL apo B) which is proportional to the amount of cholesterol per LDL particle. Three of the investigated parameters: protein-enriched LDL, HDL cholesterol and apo B level differed significantly in the two groups (corrected P < 0.001, P < 0.009 and P < 0.009, respectively). Discriminant analysis revealed that protein-enriched LDL, LDL cholesterol, apo B and fasting triglyceride levels, but not HDL cholesterol, were the major discriminating factors for CAD in this study. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to describe the association between this size-related parameter and those which in both groups seem to be most strongly associated with it: apo B/A-I ratio (i), triglyceride (ii) and LDL/HDL ratio (iii). The analysis was done separately in the two groups. In the patients with CAD the influence of these three parameters were less decisive in the determination of the protein-enriched LDL than in the controls (corr. coeff.: (i) -0.155 vs -0.358; (ii) -0.624 vs -0.791; (iii) -0163 vs -0.471). In healthy volunteers the size-reducing effect of the same parameters was more profound, and at high values of LDL/HDL ratio, apo B/apo A-I ratio and triglyceride no distinction in LDL particle size can be made any longer between CAD patients and controls. Thus the improvement of the atherogenic profile does not seem to result in the reduction of risk for CAD in terms of LDL size and composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":7090,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica Hungarica","volume":"49 1-2","pages":"65-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LDL molecular size as risk factor in coronary artery disease.\",\"authors\":\"L Kozma,&nbsp;J Fodor,&nbsp;A Chockalingam,&nbsp;B Sussex\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sera of 65 fasting human subjects--32 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) aged 42-80 years and 33 healthy individuals--were tested for determination of nine lipid-related laboratory parameters, including protein-enriched LDL (low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL apo B) which is proportional to the amount of cholesterol per LDL particle. Three of the investigated parameters: protein-enriched LDL, HDL cholesterol and apo B level differed significantly in the two groups (corrected P < 0.001, P < 0.009 and P < 0.009, respectively). Discriminant analysis revealed that protein-enriched LDL, LDL cholesterol, apo B and fasting triglyceride levels, but not HDL cholesterol, were the major discriminating factors for CAD in this study. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to describe the association between this size-related parameter and those which in both groups seem to be most strongly associated with it: apo B/A-I ratio (i), triglyceride (ii) and LDL/HDL ratio (iii). The analysis was done separately in the two groups. In the patients with CAD the influence of these three parameters were less decisive in the determination of the protein-enriched LDL than in the controls (corr. coeff.: (i) -0.155 vs -0.358; (ii) -0.624 vs -0.791; (iii) -0163 vs -0.471). In healthy volunteers the size-reducing effect of the same parameters was more profound, and at high values of LDL/HDL ratio, apo B/apo A-I ratio and triglyceride no distinction in LDL particle size can be made any longer between CAD patients and controls. Thus the improvement of the atherogenic profile does not seem to result in the reduction of risk for CAD in terms of LDL size and composition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta medica Hungarica\",\"volume\":\"49 1-2\",\"pages\":\"65-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta medica Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

65名空腹受试者(32名42-80岁冠心病患者和33名健康个体)的血清进行了测试,以确定9个与脂质相关的实验室参数,包括蛋白质富集LDL(低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL载脂蛋白B)),其与每个LDL颗粒的胆固醇量成正比。两组研究的三个参数:蛋白富集LDL、HDL胆固醇和载脂蛋白B水平差异显著(分别校正P < 0.001、P < 0.009和P < 0.009)。判别分析显示,在本研究中,蛋白富集LDL、LDL胆固醇、载脂蛋白B和空腹甘油三酯水平是CAD的主要判别因素,而不是HDL胆固醇。计算Pearson相关系数,以描述该尺寸相关参数与两组中似乎最强烈相关的参数之间的关联:载脂蛋白B/A-I比率(i),甘油三酯(ii)和LDL/HDL比率(iii)。分析在两组中分别进行。在冠心病患者中,这三个参数对富蛋白LDL测定的影响不如对照组(corff . coff)。:(i) -0.155 vs -0.358;(ii) -0.624 vs -0.791;(iii) -0163 vs -0.471)。在健康志愿者中,相同参数的减尺寸效果更为显著,且当LDL/HDL比值、载脂蛋白B/载脂蛋白A-I比值和甘油三酯值较高时,冠心病患者与对照组LDL颗粒大小不再有区别。因此,就LDL的大小和组成而言,动脉粥样硬化状况的改善似乎并没有导致冠心病风险的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LDL molecular size as risk factor in coronary artery disease.

Sera of 65 fasting human subjects--32 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) aged 42-80 years and 33 healthy individuals--were tested for determination of nine lipid-related laboratory parameters, including protein-enriched LDL (low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL apo B) which is proportional to the amount of cholesterol per LDL particle. Three of the investigated parameters: protein-enriched LDL, HDL cholesterol and apo B level differed significantly in the two groups (corrected P < 0.001, P < 0.009 and P < 0.009, respectively). Discriminant analysis revealed that protein-enriched LDL, LDL cholesterol, apo B and fasting triglyceride levels, but not HDL cholesterol, were the major discriminating factors for CAD in this study. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to describe the association between this size-related parameter and those which in both groups seem to be most strongly associated with it: apo B/A-I ratio (i), triglyceride (ii) and LDL/HDL ratio (iii). The analysis was done separately in the two groups. In the patients with CAD the influence of these three parameters were less decisive in the determination of the protein-enriched LDL than in the controls (corr. coeff.: (i) -0.155 vs -0.358; (ii) -0.624 vs -0.791; (iii) -0163 vs -0.471). In healthy volunteers the size-reducing effect of the same parameters was more profound, and at high values of LDL/HDL ratio, apo B/apo A-I ratio and triglyceride no distinction in LDL particle size can be made any longer between CAD patients and controls. Thus the improvement of the atherogenic profile does not seem to result in the reduction of risk for CAD in terms of LDL size and composition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time-course changes in pancreatic laboratory and morphologic parameters in two different acute pancreatitis models in rats. Mitotic delay in peripheral blood lymphocytes and fibroblast cultures obtained from a child with Down's syndrome and from a healthy child. The reaction of adenohypophysis hormones in primary hyperparathyroidism and after surgical treatment. Atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) responsiveness in patients with hypothyroidism. Hypothalamic dysfunction in Parkinson's disease patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1