William Aparecido Maciel da Silva, Cristiane Orquisa Fantin, Marcelo Fukui, M. Jucá
{"title":"创业公司估值:文献计量学分析与系统文献综述","authors":"William Aparecido Maciel da Silva, Cristiane Orquisa Fantin, Marcelo Fukui, M. Jucá","doi":"10.4236/ojbm.2021.94090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study maps and analyzes the academic literature \nregarding the main startups’ valuation methods by means of a \nbibliometric analysis and systematic review. The adoption of both methods \nrequires the use of software such as RStudio, VOSViewer or Rank Words. In \nbibliometric analysis, the verification of its main laws—Zipf, \nBradford and Lotka is also adopted. As a bibliometric \nanalysis result, the most frequent keywords appear to be performance, \ninnovation, entrepreneurship and venture capital. Most of the authors are associated with institutions located in Germany \nand in the United States. Concerning the systematic review results, the \ntopic of identifying funding sources is urgent, considering the fact that \nstartups are companies with high levels of uncertainty and risk. Another \nconcern refers to the way of obtaining the types of data for inputs in the \nvaluation models. Regarding the valuation methods, the ones of multiples are \nhighlighted. As for future paths for further research, the authors emphasize \nthe analysis of determinants influencing their value at different stages of \nmaturity, as well as the adoption of unconventional valuation methods.","PeriodicalId":411102,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Business and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Startups’ Valuation: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review\",\"authors\":\"William Aparecido Maciel da Silva, Cristiane Orquisa Fantin, Marcelo Fukui, M. Jucá\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/ojbm.2021.94090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study maps and analyzes the academic literature \\nregarding the main startups’ valuation methods by means of a \\nbibliometric analysis and systematic review. The adoption of both methods \\nrequires the use of software such as RStudio, VOSViewer or Rank Words. In \\nbibliometric analysis, the verification of its main laws—Zipf, \\nBradford and Lotka is also adopted. As a bibliometric \\nanalysis result, the most frequent keywords appear to be performance, \\ninnovation, entrepreneurship and venture capital. Most of the authors are associated with institutions located in Germany \\nand in the United States. Concerning the systematic review results, the \\ntopic of identifying funding sources is urgent, considering the fact that \\nstartups are companies with high levels of uncertainty and risk. Another \\nconcern refers to the way of obtaining the types of data for inputs in the \\nvaluation models. Regarding the valuation methods, the ones of multiples are \\nhighlighted. As for future paths for further research, the authors emphasize \\nthe analysis of determinants influencing their value at different stages of \\nmaturity, as well as the adoption of unconventional valuation methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411102,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Business and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.94090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2021.94090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Startups’ Valuation: A Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Literature Review
This study maps and analyzes the academic literature
regarding the main startups’ valuation methods by means of a
bibliometric analysis and systematic review. The adoption of both methods
requires the use of software such as RStudio, VOSViewer or Rank Words. In
bibliometric analysis, the verification of its main laws—Zipf,
Bradford and Lotka is also adopted. As a bibliometric
analysis result, the most frequent keywords appear to be performance,
innovation, entrepreneurship and venture capital. Most of the authors are associated with institutions located in Germany
and in the United States. Concerning the systematic review results, the
topic of identifying funding sources is urgent, considering the fact that
startups are companies with high levels of uncertainty and risk. Another
concern refers to the way of obtaining the types of data for inputs in the
valuation models. Regarding the valuation methods, the ones of multiples are
highlighted. As for future paths for further research, the authors emphasize
the analysis of determinants influencing their value at different stages of
maturity, as well as the adoption of unconventional valuation methods.