{"title":"控制回路性能监测的几个方面","authors":"P.-G. Eriksson, A. Isaksson","doi":"10.1109/CCA.1994.381372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In industries where there are a great number of control loops, it would be convenient to have some tool for monitoring the performance of individual loops. This paper starts from one available approach that evaluates the control performance compared to minimum variance control. The authors show, using an example and also from industrial data, that this technique gives an inadequate measure of the performance if the aim is not stochastic control, but step disturbance rejection. Therefore, some modified criteria are proposed and a monitoring tool utilising all available techniques outlined.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":173370,"journal":{"name":"1994 Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Applications","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some aspects of control loop performance monitoring\",\"authors\":\"P.-G. Eriksson, A. Isaksson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCA.1994.381372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In industries where there are a great number of control loops, it would be convenient to have some tool for monitoring the performance of individual loops. This paper starts from one available approach that evaluates the control performance compared to minimum variance control. The authors show, using an example and also from industrial data, that this technique gives an inadequate measure of the performance if the aim is not stochastic control, but step disturbance rejection. Therefore, some modified criteria are proposed and a monitoring tool utilising all available techniques outlined.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":173370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1994 Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Applications\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"87\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1994 Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCA.1994.381372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1994 Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Control and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCA.1994.381372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Some aspects of control loop performance monitoring
In industries where there are a great number of control loops, it would be convenient to have some tool for monitoring the performance of individual loops. This paper starts from one available approach that evaluates the control performance compared to minimum variance control. The authors show, using an example and also from industrial data, that this technique gives an inadequate measure of the performance if the aim is not stochastic control, but step disturbance rejection. Therefore, some modified criteria are proposed and a monitoring tool utilising all available techniques outlined.<>