一个关于代词、“同性恋蛋糕”和良心的故事:Mackereth诉DWP案后的强迫言论

James E. Hurford
{"title":"一个关于代词、“同性恋蛋糕”和良心的故事:Mackereth诉DWP案后的强迫言论","authors":"James E. Hurford","doi":"10.1080/10854681.2022.2138043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. In truth, the main horror of Nineteen Eighty-Four – aside from the IngSoc regime’s combination of totalitarian brutality and pettifogging bureaucracy – is The Party’s manipulation of thought and language. Airstrip One’s government spends considerable effort erasing and redefining words, to eliminate ideas unacceptable to the regime, enforcing its will through the brutal Thought Police. Towards the conclusion, the protagonist Winston Smith is interrogated by Thought Police agent O’Brien, who demands that Smith confess that O’Brien is holding up five fingers on his left hand, while in reality he is only holding up four.","PeriodicalId":232228,"journal":{"name":"Judicial Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tale of Pronouns, ‘Gay Cakes’ and Conscience: Compelled Speech After Mackereth v DWP\",\"authors\":\"James E. Hurford\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10854681.2022.2138043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2. In truth, the main horror of Nineteen Eighty-Four – aside from the IngSoc regime’s combination of totalitarian brutality and pettifogging bureaucracy – is The Party’s manipulation of thought and language. Airstrip One’s government spends considerable effort erasing and redefining words, to eliminate ideas unacceptable to the regime, enforcing its will through the brutal Thought Police. Towards the conclusion, the protagonist Winston Smith is interrogated by Thought Police agent O’Brien, who demands that Smith confess that O’Brien is holding up five fingers on his left hand, while in reality he is only holding up four.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Judicial Review\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Judicial Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2138043\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Judicial Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2022.2138043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2. 事实上,《一九八四》的主要恐怖之处——除了英社政权的极权主义暴行和繁琐的官僚主义的结合——是共产党对思想和语言的操纵。一号机场的政府花费了相当大的精力来抹去和重新定义词汇,消除政权无法接受的想法,通过残酷的思想警察来执行其意志。接近尾声时,思想警察特工奥布莱恩审问了主人公温斯顿·史密斯,奥布莱恩要求史密斯承认奥布莱恩左手举起了五个手指,而实际上他只举起了四个手指。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Tale of Pronouns, ‘Gay Cakes’ and Conscience: Compelled Speech After Mackereth v DWP
2. In truth, the main horror of Nineteen Eighty-Four – aside from the IngSoc regime’s combination of totalitarian brutality and pettifogging bureaucracy – is The Party’s manipulation of thought and language. Airstrip One’s government spends considerable effort erasing and redefining words, to eliminate ideas unacceptable to the regime, enforcing its will through the brutal Thought Police. Towards the conclusion, the protagonist Winston Smith is interrogated by Thought Police agent O’Brien, who demands that Smith confess that O’Brien is holding up five fingers on his left hand, while in reality he is only holding up four.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Article 2 and Standards of Proof in Inquests: Unintelligible, Unclear, and Unpredictable? Of Codes and Common Law: The Approach to Apparent Bias in Local Government Committees Competing ‘Clear and Unambiguous’ Constructions: Darwall v Dartmoor National Park Authority [2023] EWCA Civ 927 and the Interpretation of Private Acts of Parliament The Curious Case of Boris’ Bishop: Did the First Catholic Prime Minister Fall Foul of s 18 of the Roman Catholic Relief Act 1829? Information Law and Automated Governance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1