无偏线性模型估计量的线性性

S. Portnoy
{"title":"无偏线性模型估计量的线性性","authors":"S. Portnoy","doi":"10.1080/00031305.2022.2076743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Best linear unbiased estimators (BLUE’s) are known to be optimal in many respects under normal assumptions. Since variance minimization doesn’t depend on normality and unbiasedness is often considered reasonable, many statisticians have felt that BLUE’s ought to preform relatively well in some generality. The result here considers the general linear model and shows that any measurable estimator that is unbiased over a moderately large family of distributions must be linear. Thus, imposing unbiasedness cannot offer any improvement over imposing linearity. The problem was suggested by Hansen, who showed that any estimator unbiased for nearly all error distributions (with finite covariance) must have a variance no smaller than that of the best linear estimator in some parametric subfamily. Specifically, the hypothesis of linearity can be dropped from the classical Gauss–Markov Theorem. This might suggest that the best unbiased estimator should provide superior performance, but the result here shows that the best unbiased regression estimator can be no better than the best linear estimator.","PeriodicalId":342642,"journal":{"name":"The American Statistician","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linearity of Unbiased Linear Model Estimators\",\"authors\":\"S. Portnoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00031305.2022.2076743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Best linear unbiased estimators (BLUE’s) are known to be optimal in many respects under normal assumptions. Since variance minimization doesn’t depend on normality and unbiasedness is often considered reasonable, many statisticians have felt that BLUE’s ought to preform relatively well in some generality. The result here considers the general linear model and shows that any measurable estimator that is unbiased over a moderately large family of distributions must be linear. Thus, imposing unbiasedness cannot offer any improvement over imposing linearity. The problem was suggested by Hansen, who showed that any estimator unbiased for nearly all error distributions (with finite covariance) must have a variance no smaller than that of the best linear estimator in some parametric subfamily. Specifically, the hypothesis of linearity can be dropped from the classical Gauss–Markov Theorem. This might suggest that the best unbiased estimator should provide superior performance, but the result here shows that the best unbiased regression estimator can be no better than the best linear estimator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Statistician\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Statistician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2022.2076743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Statistician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2022.2076743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在一般假设下,最佳线性无偏估计量(BLUE’s)在许多方面是最优的。由于方差最小化不依赖于正态性,无偏性通常被认为是合理的,许多统计学家认为BLUE应该在某些普遍性中表现得相对较好。这里的结果考虑了一般线性模型,并表明任何可测量的估计量在中等大的分布族上是无偏的,必须是线性的。因此,强加无偏性并不能提供任何优于强加线性的改进。这个问题是由Hansen提出的,他表明对于几乎所有误差分布(具有有限协方差)的无偏估计量必须具有不小于某些参数子族中最佳线性估计量的方差。具体来说,线性假设可以从经典的高斯-马尔可夫定理中去掉。这可能表明最好的无偏估计量应该提供更好的性能,但这里的结果表明,最好的无偏回归估计量可能不会比最好的线性估计量更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linearity of Unbiased Linear Model Estimators
ABSTRACT Best linear unbiased estimators (BLUE’s) are known to be optimal in many respects under normal assumptions. Since variance minimization doesn’t depend on normality and unbiasedness is often considered reasonable, many statisticians have felt that BLUE’s ought to preform relatively well in some generality. The result here considers the general linear model and shows that any measurable estimator that is unbiased over a moderately large family of distributions must be linear. Thus, imposing unbiasedness cannot offer any improvement over imposing linearity. The problem was suggested by Hansen, who showed that any estimator unbiased for nearly all error distributions (with finite covariance) must have a variance no smaller than that of the best linear estimator in some parametric subfamily. Specifically, the hypothesis of linearity can be dropped from the classical Gauss–Markov Theorem. This might suggest that the best unbiased estimator should provide superior performance, but the result here shows that the best unbiased regression estimator can be no better than the best linear estimator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A review of Design of Experiments courses offered to undergraduate students at American universities On Misuses of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Test for One-Sample Goodness-of-Fit Sequential Selection for Minimizing the Variance with Application to Crystallization Experiments Sequential Selection for Minimizing the Variance with Application to Crystallization Experiments Introduction to Stochastic Finance with Market Examples, 2nd ed Introduction to Stochastic Finance with Market Examples, 2nd ed . Nicolas Privault, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, 2023, x + 652 pp., $120.00(H), ISBN 978-1-032-28826-0.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1